Originally posted by kgkgam aware of all of that again
I have proven to you that they are they same! now prove me that Swamp Thing, Books of Magic, Hellblazer, Sandman all creation of DC mainstream god now showing in Vertigo are different?
Also even Vertigo Character made after (1993) showing in DC timeline
In vertigo they don't mention Christ as you have notice they don't deal with Mortal stuff does it say there is no Christ? 🙂
YWH says there are external forces beyond him ----- it really doesn't since you don't know what those forces are.
i have told you
1.) writers of vertigo books have confirm characters used from DCU to vertigo are part of DCU universe.2.) Vertigo comic was made in 1993 lots of character now used are already made in mainstream DC
3.) Even after Vertigo we still see character made by Vertigo in mainstream DC- Spectre 50
the only thing you have said is that there is no Christ in Lucifer just cuz they don't mention Superman in all DCU comic does not mean he does not exist.
an absence of something ,not shown in comics does not mean it does not exist. - while i have clearly shown multiple example of both partly exchanging characters
again I will let people decide thats all i have to say in this matter.
Someone is getting a good bottom
Originally posted by fangirl101You interpret so horribly when it comes to DC. stop now.
Originally posted by fangirl101the Universe was VOID. Void means without form.
That which was formless. The Void itself struggled and found form.
"Out of this was Born ... The Source"
durznuts
Originally posted by Mr Master
Perhaps, but ti doesn't compare to your lies concerning Marvel & DC.The Void was NOT the Source, the Source was born AFTERwards:
"Out of this [b]was Born
... The Source"durznuts [/B]
Originally posted by fangirl101Out of the struggle and the energies being released.
Originally posted by Mr MasterThe Void was NOT the Source, the Source was born AFTERwards:
"Out of this was Born ... The Source"
durznuts
Originally posted by fangirl101Are you dense? OMG. You can't see that?
Originally posted by Mr Master
I know what it says, and it leads to this:Are you a liar? OMG. You think we don't see that?
On panel interpretation can niether be a lie nore a truth.
Now here is an opinion. Different from interpretation or a lie.
Trying to force anyone particular view upon anyone and calling them a liar if they do not agree is idiotic, egotistical, childish, and lame.
Originally posted by fangirl101
[B]A lie would be something like, Today is Sunday. When it's clearly Saturday.On panel interpretation can niether be a lie nore a truth.
Now here is an opinion. Different from interpretation or a lie.
Trying to force anyone particular view upon anyone and calling them a liar if they do not agree is idiotic, egotistical, childish, and lame.
(heck, you curse me out all the time, and I never report you, I rather slay you here)
Funny, you continuously ignore definitive on panel evidence
that's backed by handbooks and writers concerning Marvel praises,
but the ambiguous lines from DC you seem to easily find sensible logic in them
that coincidentally cater to your opinion.
I've never once addressed you for an honest opinion,
but when you continuously post claims with assertiveness as if they were facts,
you're trying to portray an image of the truth, when in fact, 99% of the time it's false.
Why don't you just ask from now on,
but then again, even if you're given the answer with the scans from on panel and Handbook sources
you'll still somehow find a way to try and spin it in order to oppose the irrefutable proof.
Originally posted by Mr Master
Yea, now play the victim, in order to try and gain sympathy,
you get called a liar, cause you lie, nice try on the flip.(heck, you curse me out all the time, and I never report you, I rather slay you here)
Funny, you continuously ignore definitive on panel evidence
that's backed by handbooks and writers concerning Marvel praises,
but the ambiguous lines from DC you seem to easily find sensible logic in them
that coincidentally cater to your opinion.I've never once addressed you for an honest opinion,
but when you continuously post claims with assertiveness as if they were facts,
you're trying to portray an image of the truth, when in fact, 99% of the time it's false.Why don't you just ask from now on,
but then again, even if you're given the answer with the scans from on panel and Handbook sources
you'll still somehow find a way to try and spin it in order to oppose the irrefutable proof.
Originally posted by Mr Master
Right, cause I'm the only one here talking about the Source for the last 3 pages. 😐
I just see a lot of folks trying to depower DC character at any given notice. Im not accusing you of doing such a thing but why would you assume the source inst omnipotent considering he is DC writers avatar. Supreme beings always end in a stalemate...except in this case he wins. Writer avatars always beat cosmic beings...always.
Superman beyond The Wall. Notice the IMPs
http://img261.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oc180001wl6.jpg
http://img139.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oc180000yj5.jpg
http://img139.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oc180002xr0.jpg
http://img139.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oc180003km5.jpg
http://img139.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oc180004xz0.jpg
http://img116.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oc180005yk3.jpg
http://img139.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oc180006eb8.jpg
Highfather with his staff 😄
http://img139.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oc180007ct6.jpg
http://img116.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oc180008ih4.jpg
Krona looking backwards...
http://img139.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oc180009sv6.jpg
The Void and The Source are 1 and the same if that makes any sense.
