Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor beat him ina few strikes.
Thor didn't beat shit. He rushed in when Rulk didn't expect it and hit him a few times with Mjolnir.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He didnt know anything about Rulk
Yet that didn't change Thor's tactics on how to beat him, did it?
Originally posted by quanchi112
and in their second encounter he almost killed him quite easily.
Almost killed him quite easily? What the f*ck comic did you read?
Rulk wasn't even KO'd.
Originally posted by quanchi112
For one Supes has a weakness against magic
Not so much anymore. And in any case, that's a huge misnomer.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I feel that writer didnt touch upon it.
The writer- Kurt Busiek- knows as much about both Superman and Thor as any person alive.
Originally posted by quanchi112
This shouldnt have eluded you. Thor was shocked he cuaght it and lost mainly due to that fact imo.
He lost because Kurt Busiek felt that Superman is better in combat than Thor.
You're making a completely fair win seem like it was in someway cheap, which it wasn't.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Current Thor has a different attitude than classic Thor. He holds back less.
He also has the Odin Power. This thread specifically states Classic Thor. There's no sense in bringing up his current feats anyway.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You are one to talk about bias. 😂
Indeed I am. Especially when I'm talking to somebody who thinks Thanos would beat Odin in a fight. 🙂
Originally posted by Knowsbleed33
He's slow because he chooses to be so, when you have power like that, you're not in a hurry to get any where.Superman being stronger than Juggernaut is pure speculation.
...
You're saying that Juggernaut is slow because he chooses to be slow, but Superman being stronger than Juggernaut is speculative?
barker
Originally posted by batdude123Thor beat him easily. Rulk beat a clueless Thor with his own hammer. When thor was ready for him it ended quickly. Thats the point.
Thor didn't beat shit. He rushed in when Rulk didn't expect it and hit him a few times with Mjolnir.Yet that didn't change Thor's tactics on how to beat him, did it?
Almost killed him quite easily? What the f*ck comic did you read?
Rulk wasn't even KO'd.
Not so much anymore. And in any case, that's a huge misnomer.
The writer- Kurt Busiek- knows as much about both Superman and Thor as any person alive.
He lost because Kurt Busiek felt that Superman is better in combat than Thor.
You're making a completely fair win seem like it was in someway cheap, which it wasn't.
He also has the Odin Power. This thread specifically states Classic Thor. There's no sense in bringing up his current feats anyway.
Indeed I am. Especially when I'm talking to somebody who thinks Thanos would beat Odin in a fight. 🙂
He knew who his opponent was and felt he dishonored mjolnir when he laid his hands upon it. Thor swore it wouldnt happen again. It didnt.
Rulk said he might have just spared his life. Thor wasnt playing around and Rulk was just standing there dazed and confused. Please read the comics you debate with me.
He is weak against magic. If he isnt feel free to post proof.
Just because he knows about it that doesnt mean he factored that in when he wrote the fight.
Supes won due to Thor's initial shock. Thats my opinion and one I can support by looking at the end of the battle.
Thor isnt as powerful as Odin. I know he has the odinpower,but I believe they arent touching upon that. Imagine writing a comic about Odin. Pretty tough to do when the guy has affected the multiverse.
Thanos has been upgraded since then. He didnt lose the first fight. 🙂
Originally posted by batdude123He grabbed him and brought the blast out immediately. Cant you see that in the scan? You keep downplaying Thor in favor of Superman. Thor is clearly more powerful and can clearly grab ahold of him.
Right, because again, Superman is just going to stand there and allow Thor to summon a blast without defending himself.facepalm
Originally posted by quanchi112
He is weak against magic. If he isnt feel free to post proof.Just because he knows about it that doesnt mean he factored that in when he wrote the fight.
Supes won due to Thor's initial shock. Thats my opinion and one I can support by looking at the end of the battle.
Thor isnt as powerful as Odin. I know he has the odinpower,but I believe they arent touching upon that. Imagine writing a comic about Odin. Pretty tough to do when the guy has affected the multiverse.
Thanos has been upgraded since then. He didnt lose the first fight. 🙂
So the intial shock is what caused him to lose....boy talk about stretching. By that same logic I can excuse all of SS loses agaisnt Thanos as a result of"CIS"and saying Thanos didnt lose the first fight is a bit out of context don't you agree. Exactly what has classic thor done(which was stated by the TS)that would make u believe he could take current supes?
Originally posted by The Great GalenYou can tell Thor was shocked that he caught his hammer. Then he got knocked out. Im not spinning anything. Superman won the fight due to that imo.
So the intial shock is what caused him to lose....boy talk about stretching. By that same logic I can excuse all of SS loses agaisnt Thanos as a result of"CIS"and saying Thanos didnt lose the first fight is a bit out of context don't you agree. Exactly what has classic thor done(which was stated by the TS)that would make u believe he could take current supes?
Thanos beat Surfer down easily. Completely different. Superman also called Thor the toughest person he faced up to that point. 😉
I alread posted some of his feats in this thread. He beat Surefr and warlock together easily.
Originally posted by fangirl101You would think if it was that easy to throw Thor around then everytime he spun his Hammer really fast he would go racing a 100 miles away...
Yeah, cuz you know, it's not like superman can't spin around really fast and throw Thor hundreds of miles away. He just stands there and let's thor try and kiss him. lulz.
Oh wait he doesn't.
Originally posted by The Great Galen
So the intial shock is what caused him to lose....boy talk about stretching. By that same logic I can excuse all of SS loses agaisnt Thanos as a result of"CIS"and saying Thanos didnt lose the first fight is a bit out of context don't you agree. Exactly what has classic thor done(which was stated by the TS)that would make u believe he could take current supes?
SS loses against thanos have absolutely NO relationship or similarities here. And classic thor vs superman is a pretty even fight that as been debated for ages. If u dont know what thor has done that makes people think he is comparable to superman then u are a joke.
Originally posted by ultimatethor😂
SS loses against thanos have absolutely NO relationship or similarities here. And classic thor vs superman is a pretty even fight that as been debated for ages. If u dont know what thor has done that makes people think he is comparable to superman then u are a joke.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You can tell Thor was shocked that he caught his hammer. Then he got knocked out. Im not spinning anything. Superman won the fight due to that imo.Thanos beat Surfer down easily. Completely different. Superman also called Thor the toughest person he faced up to that point. 😉
I alread posted some of his feats in this thread. He beat Surefr and warlock together easily.
So supes won the fight because he parried Thor's best attack and delievered a counter-hit....exactly what are you trying to say here?
Originally posted by ultimatethor
SS loses against thanos have absolutely NO relationship or similarities here. And classic thor vs superman is a pretty even fight that as been debated for ages. If u dont know what thor has done that makes people think he is comparable to superman then u are a joke.
Umm..I dont think Thor is as fast or physically strong as supes. I dont believe Thors h2h abilites compare or even his striking power, blitz FTW.