Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
Sexism is not what i wished to accomplish either.My point is, its different. Men are different from women, i didn't say better or worse. men are more physical, women are more intellectual and more gifted as multitaskers. Science and social studies have proven this.
Sexism=I don't like women i think they should stay home and make babies all day, for example.
My sentiments is that women should not demand to be treated the same way as men, they aren't designed to do many of the same jobs, as men are not designed to do many of the same jobs the women are better at doing.
There you are missing the point. Treated fairly includes that. It's not that every woman should be treated like every man, it is that women with the same set of skills and abilities should be treated equal to men. No one is denying that there are differences, what people don't want is treatment based solely on the gender of a person.
As for you being sexist, the points you made do fit very much into the major definition of sexism as follows:
sex-ism
;
1. attitudes or behavior based on traditional stereotypes of sexual roles.
And sexism is very existent today, not just in the job market, but in day to day life. Look at advertising for example, womenn are often stereotyped beyond belief. Now, being a libertarian I think advertising companies should do whatever the **** they want, but I sympathise with feminist causes and would appreciate if they were able to raise awareness of such ill treatment further and maybe get people to voluntarily stop doing it.
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
homophobic=scared of homos. no, just by logical viewpoints its not an intelligent way to reproduce.
That is incorrect, you are solely going by the root words. The definition of homophobic has changed over time and includes contempt or discrimination again homosexuals. You obviously show contempt for them..
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
All you did was say I was racist and homophobic. I'm not racist either.Racist=partial to one over the other. I never said that at all.
Sexist=partial to one over the other. I am actually, partial to females over males, but thats for obvious reasons.
Here too is your definition screwed up. You argue with incorrect terms, which doesn't really help your case.
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
and blacks and whites who get welfare ARE LAZY. I didn't say that it was just blacks or just whites. If there is racism, its towards white people, and I said that I would treat a lazy person like a lazy black person, and an enduring hard black person like an enduring white person. if your racsist, **** off, if you are going to call me a racist for doing so, **** off. I am not in favor of giving my money to lazy people, black or white, and I am not in favor of counting heads and making sure i have a black person in high up job for fear of being called racist. If there is a black person who applies for a job who is more qualified than his competitors, i totally agree that they should get the job, but hiring one on so that the head count is more even over an equally or more qualified white person is wrong.
I dislike welfare just as much as you, but I don't use it to make a point about black people being lazier or in any other way inferior. The idea that all people on welfare are lazy on top of it shows an incredible misconception about the world we live in. Not everyone has the chance to suceed, not everyone has the ability to get out of the situation they were born into. Your "racism against whites" argument, I also don't understand, what do you think is the racism that whites face today? Again, your points are slightly resembling what might be a logical conclusion but they are filled with hate and aggression towards certain races, rather than the policy or situation that causes it. The problem that blacks, imo at least in some case correctly, talk about is that if it was down to two people one white, one black, they would oftentimes not get the job, because of racist tendencies, if it weren't for legislation.
So again, arguing with you is frustrating as you hit upon points that I can agree with, but then use it to target a specific minority as bad. I, too, think affirmative action is shit, I, too, think welfare is not a good thing, etc. It's kinda like having the KKK show up at your "Save the Earth" rally.
Earth Rallier: "So, I think we invest more in alternative energy"
KKK: "YEAH, and also all those sand niggers should be sent back to their country"
Earth Rallier: "What? No...err...anyways, and maybe we can try to recycle more, too.
KKK: "YEAH, AND THOSE ****ING MEXICANS TOOK OUR JOBS!!!"
You know....
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
(maybe this rant is because I got refused a promotion because the entire branch above me was white so they needed a black person to make it seem like they weren't racist. the manager even told me this was the reason and i'd get the next spot.)
Yeah, maybe it is.