Knight's Rants.

Started by Deja~vu5 pages

Re: Re: Re: Knight's Rants.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
To be fair women are mainly breeding machines.
😂 😆

Yet we get paid for ONE EGG 10 thousand dollars to your little seed $100 a pint, maybe $50.

Fess up man, you're looking for the perfect woman while we have many a choice. LOL 😂

Re: Re: Re: Re: Knight's Rants.

Originally posted by Deja~vu
😂 😆

Yet we get paid for ONE EGG 10 thousand dollars to your little seed $100 a pint, maybe $50.

Fess up man, you're looking for the perfect woman while we have many a choice. LOL 😂

I'm not looking for woman at all. And it's much more useful for men to have multiple partners than women.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Knight's Rants.

Originally posted by Deja~vu
😂 😆

Yet we get paid for ONE EGG 10 thousand dollars to your little seed $100 a pint, maybe $50.

Fess up man, you're looking for the perfect woman while we have many a choice. LOL 😂

you wont be laughing when your eggs run out and the menopause hits and your man trades you in for a younger model cause his gun still fires like it did when he was 21....

pwnT.

Re: Re: Re: Knight's Rants.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
First of all, I didn't say all black people are lazy or ambitionless or that white people weren't. I said that the ones who collect off of welfare are, and that welfare mostly consists of black (or mexican) people. The numbers are there.

Do you really think that everyone who collects off welfare is lazy? Welfare also covers cases where the beneficiary is unable to work for whatever reason- be it psychological or physical (read: injured) and those who are laid off (are the "real Americans" who got laid off because of GM's plant closings lazy?) While there are definitely lazy people on welfare, there is no question that there are a myriad of cases where there is no alternative. In these situations it is the government who must step in. Often the government handouts are all that stand between a struggling family and homelessness or starvation.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
And I believe that anyone has the right to treat anyone the way they want to as long as they are not hurting them or invading their property or lands.

Discrimination by definition hurts the victim. Whether by threatening their safety or their livelihood, it causes harm.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
Racism does exist, but its so infinitesimal that i wonder wtf people are complaining about.

This almost seems like a parody of actual arguments, rather than an earnest belief in these positions.

Racism has not been defeated. There is one (1) senator of African descent. His name is Barack Obama. In January there will be zero (0) African American senators. We have two (2) "black" governors, and have only elected four to the position of governor in the history of our country. It goes without saying that Barack Obama is the first African-American president. Economically, you should be aware that the median household income for African Americans is well below the national average. Also, African American women are six times more likely to be incarcerated than white women, and in California, which is about as liberal as you get in America, black men are seven (7) times more likely to be jailed than white men. Clearly there is a strong and severe racial bias in the courts and politics as well as the business world.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11

What do you want to do, force that fat racist bastard to love black people? At this point, its so eliminated on a commercial and a federal scale, the only thing they could be doing is forcing individuals change their private views.

They don't have to change their own ignorant, hateful and damaging views, but they may not allow their prejudice to harm others. The disparity between whites and blacks proves that we have a long way to go before racism and discrimination is fully eradicated.
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11

I mean come on, if the majority of people thought that blacks were niggers and treated them that way, then Obama would not be president.

Are you really going to argue that racism has been vanquished because we have a black president? (elect) The lack of people of color in Congress and disparity in economic and education levels between the populations is evidence that we have a great deal left to do.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
OH and gay people I don't want to be sued because I think that gay is illogical for us as a race, that would suck.

1. Not to be pedantic, but why would someone bring a lawsuit against you? I dislike the ubiquity of the verb "to sue" as a synonym for attack. Not only does it trivialize the court system (and reflect the massive number of trivial cases) it reeks of pop-culture.

2. Gays (if I may make a blanket statement about another group about which I know little) are not generally interested in prolonging the species. To the best of my knowledge neither are heterosexuals. The expression of feelings of love and closeness is the most important part of any relationship. The production of offspring is a side effect.

Originally posted by inimalist
so, just for clarification, an "inimalist rants here" thread is a go then?

I would read it.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
[QUOTE=11317831]Originally posted by Phantom Zone
1. Racism has improved but its still there.
2. He was 10 times better than MCCain
3. America is up shit creak if they don't vote for the right president. If you're racist and your dying you will damn well vote for the black guy whos 10 times better.

All of them are your opinion.[/quote]
1. Racism is less overt, but is still very much alive.
2. Obama's victory shows that his policies were better than McCain, or at least that his presentation of said ideas was more effective.
3. That you were unable to see past your prejudice and vote for the best, most qualified man does not mean that the rest of the American public was so limited. I sincerely believe that the voting population is intelligent enough to vote on substance. That "Hussein" was insufficient to deny him the White House, that "Socialist" was not enough to cast doubt on the better candidate gives me hope for the efficacy of democracy. The response of the Republican party ("not my president" stickers, boos and catcalls at McCain's concession speech, and the increase in threats against the President Elect's life) make me wonder why they got to question the Democrats' patriotism, when they are showing so little.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
Its a dying bandwagon. The point is, I don't think that racism should have been one of obama's only campaigns,

You realize that he did not campaign on the basis of his race? The good folks over at FOX news might want you to believe otherwise, but Obama's race ignored race.
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
i should have liked to hear more about what he wanted to do.

You realize that he bought a half-hour TV spot explaining exactly what his policies are? That during the debates he included more specifics and numbers than did his Opponent? That he had an entire website explaining his stances? Ya know, those FOX guys, they don't have a monopoly on information. Even a token effort to investigate the candidates yields a vast array of information. Your ignorance is your own fault.
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
A racist is constitutionally allowed to be racist, and its just individuals at this point, not nationally, or commercially.

It may not be an organized, structured effort, but racism is still present and widespread. It isn't over yet.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Knight's Rants.

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
Racism has not been defeated. There is one (1) senator of African descent. His name is Barack Obama. In January there will be zero (0) African American senators. We have two (2) "black" governors, and have only elected four to the position of governor in the history of our country. It goes without saying that Barack Obama is the first African-American president. Economically, you should be aware that the median household income for African Americans is well below the national average. Also, African American women are six times more likely to be incarcerated than white women, and in California, which is about as liberal as you get in America, black men are seven (7) times more likely to be jailed than white men. Clearly there is a strong and severe racial bias in the courts and politics as well as the business world.

the incarceration rates and the severity of punishment of black men arrested for crack possession is astronomical when compared to those of white males arrested for cocaine possession.

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
I would read it.

😮
😍

Re: Re: Re: Re: Knight's Rants.

Originally posted by Red Nemesis

Do you really think that everyone who collects off welfare is lazy? Welfare also covers cases where the beneficiary is unable to work for whatever reason- be it psychological or physical (read: injured) and those who are laid off (are the "real Americans" who got laid off because of GM's plant closings lazy?) While there are definitely lazy people on welfare, there is no question that there are a myriad of cases where there is no alternative. In these situations it is the government who must step in. Often the government handouts are all that stand between a struggling family and homelessness or starvation.

Discrimination by definition hurts the victim. Whether by threatening their safety or their livelihood, it causes harm.

This almost seems like a parody of actual arguments, rather than an earnest belief in these positions.

Racism has not been defeated. There is one (1) senator of African descent. His name is Barack Obama. In January there will be zero (0) African American senators. We have two (2) "black" governors, and have only elected four to the position of governor in the history of our country. It goes without saying that Barack Obama is the first African-American president. Economically, you should be aware that the median household income for African Americans is well below the national average. Also, African American women are six times more likely to be incarcerated than white women, and in California, which is about as liberal as you get in America, black men are seven (7) times more likely to be jailed than white men. Clearly there is a strong and severe racial bias in the courts and politics as well as the business world.


They don't have to change their own ignorant, hateful and damaging views, but they may not allow their prejudice to harm others. The disparity between whites and blacks proves that we have a long way to go before racism and discrimination is fully eradicated.

Yes, but its only individuals, not large corporations or the government.
[quote]
Are you really going to argue that racism has been vanquished because we have a black president? (elect) The lack of people of color in Congress and disparity in economic and education levels between the populations is evidence that we have a great deal left to do.
the lack of black people in congress? how about the lack of black people trying for congress? the lack of black people even studying politics? Come on, mate. the lack of black people in high places is due to the lack of black people trying to get to high places.

1. Not to be pedantic,
i c paradox? btw, for future reference, not to be pedantic, but the internet=pop culture. you can't separate them.


2. Gays (if I may make a blanket statement about another group about which I know little) are not generally interested in prolonging the species. To the best of my knowledge neither are heterosexuals. The expression of feelings of love and closeness is the most important part of any relationship. The production of offspring is a side effect.
its still quite illogical, and the fact that they want me to accept them for doing it wrong is complete B.S. And besides, aren't you the one who was arguing evolution and secularism and survival of the fittest? If so, there is no such thing as love and closeness, just the hormonic desire to reproduce.


All of them are your opinion.

1. Racism is less overt, but is still very much alive.
2. Obama's victory shows that his policies were better than McCain, or at least that his presentation of said ideas was more effective.[/quote]
no, stupid people were why obama won, whether or not he was the best choice or not. http://www.howobamagotelected.com/ this is not implying that you are stupid m8, you are probably one of the few who knows their stuff. Common consensus is not always the best standard for judging what is better/worse. It is also your opinion that his policies "were" (shouldn't you say are?) better.

3. That you were unable to see past your prejudice and vote for the best, most qualified man does not mean that the rest of the American public was so limited. I sincerely believe that the voting population is intelligent enough to vote on substance. That "Hussein" was insufficient to deny him the White House, that "Socialist" was not enough to cast doubt on the better candidate gives me hope for the efficacy of democracy. The response of the Republican party ("not my president" stickers, boos and catcalls at McCain's concession speech, and the increase in threats against the President Elect's life) make me wonder why they got to question the Democrats' patriotism, when they are showing so little.

I'm sorry, did you just call me racist in my voting habits? This exactly what Knight's rant #1 is about. i voted for a white man so you call me racist for not voting for the black man because you think hes better. the ****ing race trap card.

You realize that he did not campaign on the basis of his race? The good folks over at FOX news might want you to believe otherwise, but Obama's race ignored race.

You realize that he bought a half-hour TV spot explaining exactly what his policies are? That during the debates he included more specifics and numbers than did his Opponent? That he had an entire website explaining his stances? Ya know, those FOX guys, they don't have a monopoly on information. Even a token effort to investigate the candidates yields a vast array of information. Your ignorance is your own fault.

It may not be an organized, structured effort, but racism is still present and widespread. It isn't over yet. [/B]


http://www.howobamagotelected.com/ all i have to say about it. oh, and he bought an ENTIRE CHANNEL on our satelite network dedicated to himself, but every time i turned it on I heard change, better healthcare, or racism.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Knight's Rants.

Originally posted by inimalist
the incarceration rates and the severity of punishment of black men arrested for crack possession is astronomical when compared to those of white males arrested for cocaine possession.

😮
😍

maybe its just because there are more black men on crach then white men on cocaine? I mean come the **** on, use logic, me mates.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Knight's Rants.

Cocaine is a far more predominately used drug. You fail again.

indeed, though prevalence plays no role in the severity of sentencing

Welfare: Yeah, I'm sure no honest hard working person who just got laid off during this recession would ever consider asking for welfare.

I love smart discussion 🙂.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
maybe its just because there are more black men on crach then white men on cocaine? I mean come the **** on, use logic, me mates.

There are more white drug users in America than there are black drug users by far, nearly surpassing the entire black population.

Blimey mate! You almost missed that one!

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11

Population of black people in america=38,662,569

Population of white people in america=223,005,483

total: 261668052

Now pardon me if my calculations are incorrect, but the calculations are (not including other races for the moment), that out of black people and white people put together, 14.775% are black people. and 85.224% are white.

Why has no one corrected this yet?

This guy is incredible. Really.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Knight's Rants.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
Yes, but its only individuals, not large corporations or the government.

The fact that about 10% of the African American male population is incarcerated surely shows some bias. You can at least acknowledge that. Also, there are (according to an NPR blurb) only four black CEOs on the Fortune 500 list. Four. That can only be an indication of a deeper problem
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
the lack of black people in congress? how about the lack of black people trying for congress? the lack of black people even studying politics? Come on, mate. the lack of black people in high places is due to the lack of black people trying to get to high places.

Do you really want to make this argument? That African Americans don't try hard enough? Please don't go there. The entire culture models a lifestyle that they feel barred from. (here I go with the generalizations again. This is a tough subject to keep away from blanket statements.) If anything, the lack of African Americans in the political landscape belies the deeper problem of racism, rather than being a cause.

As for a lack of attempts to break into politics, remember that most races are contingent upon attaining the endorsement of a major political party. This endorsement will not come unless there is a reasonable chance of the candidate's victory. Between the year 1990 and 2000 there were only six (6) competitive races for senate with a black candidate. That there is a deficit of candidacies is not the fault of the political aspirants; the blame rests on the shoulders of the two-party system, the cynics who operate it, and the distrustful nature of the electorate.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
i c paradox? btw, for future reference, not to be pedantic, but the internet=pop culture. you can't separate them.

Go ahead and look up 'pedantic.' You were not in this case. The internet =/= pop culture. It may convey pop culture, but it can also communicate intelligence and facilitate rational and mature discussion. (ha) It is what we make of it. If you want to flood one of the more sober corners with trash and irrelevancies then so be it. Bear in mind that it illustrates your own lack of maturity. (That's what the OTF is for anyway.)

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
its still quite illogical, and the fact that they want me to accept them for doing it wrong is complete B.S. And besides, aren't you the one who was arguing evolution and secularism and survival of the fittest? If so, there is no such thing as love and closeness, just the hormonic desire to reproduce.

The scientific fact "Evolution" has no bearing on how I deal with civil rights issues. I don't think that it applies here at all.

What, specifically are they doing wrong? I know of no instances where a gay person has forced their preference upon a heterosexual individual, and to the best of my knowledge homosexuality has no adverse effects upon society as a whole.

Secularism, evolution and survival of the fittest do not preclude love and closeness: I have emotions too. That I know they are caused by interactions of chemicals in the brain (I'm stepping on Inimalist's turf here) does not lessen their potency. If you wish to argue that homosexuality selects away from itself (does not propagate into the next generation) remember that by its very fact of existence it must be at least partially viable. If it makes them happy, what right do you have to judge that it is not acceptable. What gives you the power to dictate their life?

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11

no, stupid people were why obama won, whether or not he was the best choice or not. http://www.howobamagotelected.com/ this is not implying that you are stupid m8, you are probably one of the few who knows their stuff. Common consensus is not always the best standard for judging what is better/worse. It is also your opinion that his policies "were" (shouldn't you say are?) better.

I said "were" because I dealing with his stated policies during campaign. Doubtless they will end up being changed to cope with the debt he will be left by the former (hooray!) republican President.

The video on the site is pathetic. Case studies do not prove a point. I will never get those 12 minutes of my life back. I'm outraged. That democratic voters watched democratic news outlets proves nothing about their intelligence. Boston Legal made an entire episode based on the idea of an uninformed voter (republican) getting fired for voting for McCain, even though her boss agreed with her vote, just not her motivations. The problem is the sidelining of polite political discourse: On cable speaking louder is considered a way to prove one's point. An improved education system (free of No Child Left Behind) is the first step to rectify the situation.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11

I'm sorry, did you just call me racist in my voting habits? This exactly what Knight's rant #1 is about. i voted for a white man so you call me racist for not voting for the black man because you think hes better. the ****ing race trap card.

The "black man" was the better candidate. He is a better speaker, he is more intelligent, he is simply better on the Economy, the War and on civil/domestic matters. The nation wanted Obama. You are racist if you voted for McCain simply because of the color of any of the candidates' skin color. You are racist if you voted against Obama based on the nationality of his relatives. I did not call you racist in my previous post, but I will now if you claim to have voted for McCain because of race.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11

http://www.howobamagotelected.com/ all i have to say about it. oh, and he bought an ENTIRE CHANNEL on our satelite network dedicated to himself, but every time i turned it on I heard change, better healthcare, or racism.

Was that channel 24/7? I only knew about the half-hour before the last World Series game. Now I wish I had cable/satellite TV.

That website is a joke. It asks leading questions, the quotes are all out of context, and I thought that the Palin/Fey skit was hilarious. Palin wishes that she had been the one to say it.

Don't threads that revolve around a single member's whims belong in the Off Topic Forum?

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Knight's Rants.

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
The fact that about 10% of the African American male population is incarcerated surely shows some bias. You can at least acknowledge that.
How? I don't see how you can say that its biased because 10% of the african american population is incarcerated. You act like its a socialist camp, man. They were convicted by a jury of their peers, not put in prison by the whims of a white bigot.

Also, there are (according to an NPR blurb) only four black CEOs on the Fortune 500 list. Four. That can only be an indication of a deeper problem

What is the problem? racism? A lack of education? In my opinion its the welfare. The welfare holds them down, as soon as they start working they stop getting welfare. with kids growing up with their parents not caring and just smoking away they're trouble its no wonder the black people are cursed.


Do you really want to make this argument? That African Americans don't try hard enough? Please don't go there. The entire culture models a lifestyle that they feel barred from. (here I go with the generalizations again. This is a tough subject to keep away from blanket statements.) If anything, the lack of African Americans in the political landscape belies the deeper problem of racism, rather than being a cause.

I'm sorry. You are blanketing it, and I'm afraid its not a breaking in thing. One of my bosses was a black man, a college professor of mine is a black man. Statistically, there aren't that many. I'm afraid its not racism but a lack of ambition and need to make a better life for themselves (see above for details about welfare)

As for a lack of attempts to break into politics, remember that most races are contingent upon attaining the endorsement of a major political party. This endorsement will not come unless there is a reasonable chance of the candidate's victory. Between the year 1990 and 2000 there were only six (6) competitive races for senate with a black candidate.
1. This was 8 years ago. 2. This was 8 years ago. 3. I'll bet if you counted up the ratio of people who try to the ratio of people who break in, the amount of black people is reasonable when compared to the amount of white people who get in if this ratio applies.
That there is a deficit of candidacies is not the fault of the political aspirants; the blame rests on the shoulders of the two-party system, the cynics who operate it, and the distrustful nature of the electorate.

Not really. what do you want to do, force them to pick a candidate they don't support?


Go ahead and look up 'pedantic.' You were not in this case.
not to be pedantic, but that's why yours was a paradox and mine wasn't. 😆


The scientific fact "Evolution" has no bearing on how I deal with civil rights issues. I don't think that it applies here at all.
actually when you talk about something that is right or wrong with someone of the secular belief system they tend to deny your rules of right or wrong due to the fact that in a secular belief system there is nobody to apply standards of right or wrong. that is why I made this reference, and survival of the fittest means that gay people are not fit, spread disease, and are bad for the evolution of our species.

What, specifically are they doing wrong?
well, i don't know how to tell you this precisely... you should know by now... you are in high school after all...
I know of no instances where a gay person has forced their preference upon a heterosexual individual, and to the best of my knowledge homosexuality has no adverse effects upon society as a whole.
aids. look at africa.

Secularism, evolution and survival of the fittest do not preclude love and closeness: I have emotions too. That I know they are caused by interactions of chemicals in the brain (I'm stepping on Inimalist's turf here) does not lessen their potency. If you wish to argue that homosexuality selects away from itself (does not propagate into the next generation) remember that by its very fact of existence it must be at least partially viable. If it makes them happy, what right do you have to judge that it is not acceptable. What gives you the power to dictate their life?
I didn't say I should dictate or control them... nobody should... i just don't want to be at blame when I say its wrong, bad for society and overall just a bad idea...

The video on the site is pathetic. Case studies do not prove a point. I will never get those 12 minutes of my life back. I'm outraged. That democratic voters watched democratic news outlets proves nothing about their intelligence.

I'm sorry. This "democratic news outlet" did a pretty good job of slinging mud at the side they disagreed with while making obama look like ****ing jesus, lol.

Boston Legal made an entire episode based on the idea of an uninformed voter (republican) getting fired for voting for McCain, even though her boss agreed with her vote, just not her motivations. The problem is the sidelining of polite political discourse: On cable speaking louder is considered a way to prove one's point. An improved education system (free of No Child Left Behind) is the first step to rectify the situation.
Um... your point?


The "black man" was the better candidate. He is a better speaker, he is more intelligent, he is simply better on the Economy, the War and on civil/domestic matters. The nation wanted Obama. You are racist if you voted for McCain simply because of the color of any of the candidates' skin color. You are racist if you voted against Obama based on the nationality of his relatives. I did not call you racist in my previous post, but I will now if you claim to have voted for McCain because of race.
I did not vote mcain for his race, but because I believe that obama is a socialist, which I am perfectly free to believe If i want to. and i was refering to:
3. That you were unable to see past your prejudice and vote for the best,


Was that channel 24/7? I only knew about the half-hour before the last World Series game. Now I wish I had cable/satellite TV.
I guess....

That website is a joke. It asks leading questions, the quotes are all out of context, and I thought that the Palin/Fey skit was hilarious. Palin wishes that she had been the one to say it.
lol translation: "I reject your evidence and submit my own" the point is, the media has done a good job of fattening up the masses on obama's cock, while trying their best to take palin/mcain's words out of context or parody them and prove them stupid, while even doing less to alert the masses to the existence of other republican candidates for certain positions.

Okay: I'll say it again....

Get the **** out.

Re: Knight's Rants.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
This is the thread where I will express myself with a political rant involving one of today's issues. And my first one: Racism and Sexism.

I am sorry, but we are all different. equal, but different. A black person is a black person, on average a kenyan will run faster than some fatass english dude, and some people are better at certain things than others.

When you ask me to compare a man with a woman, a black man with a white man, its like asking me to compare a wrench with a screwdriver with a hammer. they are all equally indispensable, but they are better at different things. Sure you can use a wrench as a hammer, but its not going to do as good of a job.

I respect a man in a business suit. This is a man who I am motivated by, who It is an honor knowing. those people who hang out on the streets who collect on welfare, I have no respect for them. They don't have the ambition or the motivation to better their position, they live in crap, they are content with crap, and they aren't even trying. Black or white, man or woman, you're better at work.

So why am I so P'O'd about people who cry racism? because its dead. If anything, the white people are the ones being discriminated against. We work hard, and our just deserts are taken to pay for welfare, which is almost totally lazy, ambitionless black people. I'm not saying that white people aren't lazy and ambitionless, but most of the people our tax money goes to are either mexican or black people who take from society and never give. Why is the government so biased? I don't know, you will have to ask someone else, but this is socialistic and it removes the need to work. Why work when I can get a check once a month and live in a dump?

Sexism:
Ok, I'm sorry, this is going to sound horribly biased and awful, but a man is a man and a woman is a woman. they are different, k? They are both needed, both should have equal rights, but they shouldn't get equal treatment because they are different. Nobody likes walking down the street and seeing some white trash tub who thinks shes some guy. Women are more elegant, more visually appealing, and just overall better than men. Men are stronger, more base, and can accomplish more physically. Why are we crying about the man-woman ratio in management? the truth is, the man to woman ratio in the workforce is the same. Its not an all boys game, its open, just more women tend to be stay at home moms or don't stay in the workforce long enough to get a management position.

Whats my point? I'm tired of the race card and the sexism card. I'm going to f***ing treat you like an american if you are black or white or male or female. I'm not treating a female like a male (seriously she'd think that's kind of creepy), and I'm not treating white or black trash like people who go out and work for their living. And I don't expect someone to treat me like a woman. If i hear someone else whining because they are black and they didn't get a job or a raise or a promotion, i'm going to stab them, because its not that your black, its probably that you were less qualified than your competitor. In the sense that the only ones talking about racism or whining about it are the black people, the only ones being racist towards the black people are themselves.

(this is something i wrote down to get my ideas down for a paper i am writing. I decided that it might be nice to hear some people's opinions in the process)

Why are you wearing that stupid bunny suit?

Re: Re: Knight's Rants.

Originally posted by KidRock
Why are you wearing that stupid bunny suit?

You didn't even notice the math I did on welfare?weep

You of all people would appreciate the outcome of those numbers.

Re: Re: Re: Knight's Rants.

Originally posted by dadudemon
You didn't even notice the math I did on welfare?weep

You of all people would appreciate the outcome of those numbers.

Hmm...hmmm...

I guess I really should ask then: Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?

SO HERE IS MY POINT. THE POINT IS NOT THAT I HATE BLACKS or THAT BLACKS ARE DIFFERENT,

ITS THAT I'M TIRED OF HEARING ABOUT RACISM.

I never see it, and the only time i do is when its me handing over the welfare share of my paycheck or when that dude that was honestly less qualified then me got that job spot.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
SO HERE IS MY POINT. THE POINT IS NOT THAT I HATE BLACKS or THAT BLACKS ARE DIFFERENT,

ITS THAT I'M TIRED OF HEARING ABOUT RACISM.

I never see it, and the only time i do is when its me handing over the welfare share of my paycheck or when that dude that was honestly less qualified then me got that job spot.

Troll.