Red Nemesis
The Blind Critic
Originally posted by jaden101
ah so knowing roughly how big the fleet is is the same as knowing exactly how many vessels and the types of those vessels is?film...canon...the end
The
events that took place in the film are canon. I could
not argue with you if your claim was that "Han Solo said that '[whatever the exact quote is.]'" I can not dispute that he said it. In this, if in nothing else, you are correct. What you are completely, totally, flat out
WRONG about is your assertion that Han Solo knew what he was talking about. Ignoring any of my previous objections, where is your
proof that Han Solo is any more credible in a discussion about the Empire's total numbers than Baby Anakin? Han simply is not knowledgeable in this area. Yes, he
said it, but that does not automatically make it true.
Originally posted by jaden101
and going back to the argument...someone said that the peak of the empire there was 25,000 ships.still isn't anywhere near the firepower in ST...so they still get destroyed.
1. I never supported those numbers, nor have I investigated them. The assertion that Han Solo = Absolute authority is all that I initially objected to. Now that I'm
here however, I may as well point out to you just where you went wrong.
2. Star Trek Vessels are generally large (most appear about even in size to the Enterprise) and not very maneuverable (Voyager's "evasive action" consisted
entirely of a gentle curve away from the enemy). Star
Wars Vessels are split into two main categories: Capital Ships and fighters. Capital ships are well fortified yet slow, while fighters are nimble yet easily destroyed in fights with technological equals. Here's where the capacities differ: energy output. A typical capital ship during the clone wars (the Republic
Acclamator class) has weaponry that deals damage in the gigaton range. (Each "quad-turbolaser turret deals 200 gigatons/shot.) Federation Shields are capable of giving (according to D. Truculent's site) ~6400 MW 'sustainable load.' This would mean that a single shot from an outdated ship's main gun would punch
right through the shields of even one of the more advanced Federation vessels. Numbers won't save the Federation.
Originally posted by jaden101
the difference between me and most of the people in these forums is that i like SW and ST...and i'm not some 1 sided raging fanboy who cant see past their own biased opinion.
My first Scifi experience was Star Trek. If anything I'm predisposed to side with Trek, rather than Wars. (Their technology looks cooler.) The problem is that the facts simply do not support your position.
Also, isn't calling someone a "1 sided raging [biased] fanboy" more insulting than the word "idiot?" Surely this counts as bashing. In fact,
REPORTED
Originally posted by jaden101
even if you take some of the EU into account it looks pretty dodgy from the SW side...in the thrawn trilogy the Katana fleet and who controls it can decide the fate of the galaxy...and that was only 200 ships.i hardly think that some 24,000 ships were destroyed between the peak of the empire and the time of the Thrawn trilogy
O....K? I haven't supported these numbers and until I refresh my array of sources (I love public libraries) I will not be able to contest this point. Please keep it out of any misguided attempts at rebuttals.
Originally posted by jaden101
lets not also forget that Sidious said that it is not force that keeps the systems in line but fear of force...questioning whether the empire really had the ability to apply massive military force.
So, because Stalin had secret Police he didn't have a powerful army? You realize that a military solution is only necessary when tactics fail? The use of Military Force would only encourage further uprisings: The Emperor was using the most
efficient method of Empire control, not the most brutal. He was a pragmatist.
Originally posted by jaden101
and lets not forget the fact that the empire effectively fell at the battle of Endor where it only put 50 star destroyers into the battle....surely if it had thousands more then, even with the death of the emperor, they could still have destroyed the alliance with ease.
And I quote:
Your overconfidence is your weakness.
The empire lost both of its senior (Sith) commanders. The Chain of Command was
decimated during that battle. The Emperor wanted to bait a trap, not fortify his position. All of these reasons (and, I suppose PIS) account for the relatively small size of the Empire's fleet at Endor.
Face it: you haven't got a leg to stand on. Han isn't infallible, The Emperor was arrogant, and Star Wars's weapons (and by association their shields) are simply more powerful than their Star Trek counterparts. The Empire wins.
(I didn't even point out that the Acclamator is ~1/9 the strength of a Star Destroyer. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.)