srankmissingnin
VP of Comic Knowledge
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Not that time he wasnt.
Maybe.
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
and Wolverine has been koed by a bullet to the head before, so that means it should happen everytime? No it doesnt.
Bad example, that's out of line with the how Wolverine's healing factor is displayed the vast, vast majority of the time, where as Blade doesn't have any feats to suggest he can take a bullet to center mass with no effect. In this example Blade shrugging off a bullet from Punisher is comparable to your example, not Blade getting koed by a bullet.
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Well hes been shot in the leg with machine gunfire and kept going...so I dont know about that.
Who hasn't? Take bullets to the limbs is an entirely different matter then taking them to the center mass. There are vital organ where Punisher shot Blade, and a guy who's got stitches to deal with superficial gashes and had claw marks on his face of a full issue, wouldn't heal remotely fast enough to deal with such a wound.
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Furthermore you have heard the expression "You think im joking?"..and im pretty sure 90 percent of the time that means im NOT joking, but obvoulsy you forgot that so you could downplay Blades durability.
I don't care that he said "You think I'm joking," (even though he didn't say that, he said "You think I'm crazy" but whatever), I think that everything was a bluff, a string of bullshit to convince Punisher that he was a vampire. He also implied that he could take a bullet to the face, and that he could killed Frank before he "even thought about pulling the trigger," and then he dared Frank to shoot him the face... anyone here think any of that was accurate?
If he wasn't wearing kevlar and he took a bullet to center mass, then we are left with a feat that is in the vast minority with how Blade is typically displayed. Like I said, we can either flat out write the feat off has PIS, or try to rationalise it, and the only way to rationalise it so it feats with how Blade is typically depicted is as a bluff. So once again, you have two options, take your pick.
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
No you dont all you do is nitpick all the time. You take yourself far too serioulsy and I dont know what you did to earn your attitude. *shrug*
Yeah I nitpick all the time. I don't think that knocking someone back three feat with a dagger is a class 20 feat of strength, that a brief spar with a nobody that was stated to be foreplay is an accurate display of skill, or that getting effortlessly stomped into the ground by Wolverine and pulling out a last minute Dues Ex Machina device that may or may not have worked is a stalemate. My bias knows no bounds! 🙄
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Dont care its a debate, anyway MK and Bullseye have much better feats than Punisher, Punisher can still beat or stalemate them in h2h. So thats something to think about.
I'm not sure I'd agree that Moonknight has better feats then Punisher, but anyway like I said, Punisher beats virtually everyone he comes across. People sell Frank short he is resourceful, ruthless, and most importantly he has demi-god like damage soak. Frank is a monster, he can take a beating better than virtually anyone and keep coming.