Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
So YOU say.
http://www.imdb.com/find?s=all&q=die+hard
McClaine: "Not for a long time."
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
So YOU say.
http://www.imdb.com/find?s=all&q=die+hard
McClaine: "Not for a long time."
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Yes. Its an imdb link.I've seen one before.
1980s, 1990s, 2000s.
3 decades of McClane dominance. 🙂
3 decades? 😕 Die Hard 1 was made in 1988. Die Hard 4 was made in 2007. Thats 19 years by my count, not even TWO decades.
Yes, and 12 years of those 19 he did nothing, probably munching on donuts and fighting with the Missus.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
3 decades? 😕 Die Hard 1 was made in 1988. Die Hard 4 was made in 2007. Thats 19 years by my count, not even TWO decades.Yes, and 12 years of those 19 he did nothing, probably munching on donuts and fighting with the Missus.
LOLZ
That too.
But one things for sure, he couldnt have been fit enough to pull off DH4 were that the case.
I know its confusing.
1980s
1990s
2000s
Three different decades, are they not...?
Think of it like in a "fighting in 3 weight divisions" sort of way.
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthWell, Riggs had just taken out almost the entire crew of the Alba Varden, taken a knife to the leg, fought Vorstded h2h, killed him, AND taken a "Family of .44.s" in the back. How well would McClaine have held up there?
Powell only really helped at the end.Zeus didnt kill anyone. It was all McClane, baby.
You say that, yet who fetched help for Riggs after he had been shot..?
Hey I aint saying that it makes him a pussy. 🙂
Just pointing out that hed be dead from that otherwise Roger helped him. Which he did.
And Im glad he did or there'd be no LW 3 or 4..
And whilst its true that McClane would have required help, it'd have to be from some random passer by rather than a buddy cop partner.
And the last time we saw McClane have a partner, McClane still did all the killing. (And McClane was good enough not to get shot those 6 times, anyways. 😛 )
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Heh now in a ironic moment, Im gonna be off for a few hours...
Why...? Cause Im gonna be watching LW.... 😛Debates is debates, quality movies is quality movies.
And all this talk has got me whipped up for it.And they are two damned fine sets of movies, in any case.
It got me watching the DH movies again haermm
Indeed they are. I like McClaine more, he is way cooler, just so you know.
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
LOLZ
That too.
But one things for sure, he couldnt have been fit enough to pull off DH4 were that the case.I know its confusing.
1980s
1990s
2000sThree different decades, are they not...?
Think of it like in a "fighting in 3 weight divisions" sort of way.
Hard to say if Riggs would have been up for DH4.
19 years, jackass haermm
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Yeah sure, blah blah blah, more of your usual bullshit.And now you are dragging past arguments into a thread when you are getting your ass handed to you. You are out of gas, aincha? You are one of those "The bigger guy aways wins!!" idiots, arent you? And you obviously know nothing of Lee, and NOW your crutch is "All the talk about Lee is heresay!!!" 🙄
Riggs owns McClaine, you know it and I know it. It's OK to admit it, you know.
BOTTOM LIME: Onscreen H2H fights, ONE ON ONE H2H fights, the H2H part only, who has a better record? RIGGS.
Oh yeah thats some pwnage. I even have the receipt.
I'm showing your hypocrisy, when arguing against something suited you in a different thread, you did, now you're arguing for it, because it suits you in this thread, that's being a hypocrite, son. Can't have it both ways.
Big guys don't always win and we did the Lee thing before, he has no fight record, anything he supposedly did outside of his films is hearsay; that's a fact. If you have proof of Lee in actual fights, be they street or in the ring, do post them, but we all know you can't, all you have is this fantasy about a guy based on some movies. So it's hearsay feats Vs a tested world class fighter. So who's the idiot?
You'd be wrong in that too, McClaine despite lacking Riggs claimed background/training, kicks the asses of guys/girls who should beat him, he does this alone too boot.
Originally posted by RobtardYou wanna talk Lee versus Ali, dig the thread up, this is not the time or place for it. You believe it's all heresay, I believe it is fact.
I'm showing your hypocrisy, when arguing against something suited you in a different thread, you did, now you're arguing for it, because it suits you in this thread, that's being a hypocrite, son. Can't have it both ways.Big guys don't always win and we did the Lee thing before, he has no fight record, anything he supposedly did outside of his films is hearsay; that's a fact. If you have proof of Lee in actual fights, be they street or in the ring, do post them, but we all know you can't, all you have is this fantasy about a guy based on some movies. So it's hearsay feats Vs a tested world class fighter. So who's the idiot?
You'd be wrong in that too, McClaine despite lacking Riggs claimed background/training, kicks the asses of guys/girls who should beat him, he does this alone too boot.
You are gonna make me list all of Riggs and MvcClaine's one on one fights, aren't you?
OK, gimme a bit and I will.
Be fair now, RJ. We already proved that McClane has beaten opponents of more than Rigg's Calibre. The resume/cv proved this from DH2.
He beat and killed that guy, while fighting his buddy too.
They were two guys of Rigg's level tag teaming McClane and he killed once more.
(1 temporarily escaped with his life for a bit, but he got his later.)
McClane has done this in both armed and unarmed circumstances.
Once we eliminate the 'training means victory against McClane' assumption, it comes next down to who is the more prolific killer.
Which again is McClane.