Not YOU, Incanus said that.
OK: how about this? You respond to my posts from before, but this time not only explain why you think that they're wrong, but how they're "idiotic". One can be "wrong" (which I'm not, BTW) and yet still not be idiotic.
For example:
I claimed that Kas'im could block Vader's force attacks because he could block an attack that was capable of knocking down a temple and pulverizing his body.
You've explained why you think that it's wrong.
Now, explain how it's idiotic. Like as in explain how it's stupid, not just how it's wrong.
What? You don't want to? Because you can't. Even if I'm wrong, it IS perfectly REASONABLE and NOT idiotic to believe that someone could stop Vader's attack because they stopped temple busting attacks. Whether or not that's correct, it makes sense. How's that idiotic? Seriously?