H2: Halloween 2

Started by Davis Bloome31 pages

I went to see the movie again Saturday with my brother, and he's fairly convinced there's no way they can make a sequel. But, I was wondering....

Spoiler:
What if Michael had survived the events of H2, and were to be sent back to Smith's Grove?

Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing something along those lines.

What's RZH? Did you mean "Resurrection"

Oh and i read this on wiki (it's about H3):

On August 30, 2009, Bob Weinstein announced that there were plans to release a new Halloween during the summer of 2010, and that the film would be in 3-D. Weinstein stated that Zombie would not be back to direct the next installment, but that the next film will would pick up where Halloween II ends and "give a new twist on slasher Myers".

A bit too soon of a release.. As long as it's good a not as bad as the 90's and early 'oo's releases.

It does sound right, but I wouldn't take information about film news off places like Wikipedia, anyone can write any old crap on there, unless they have stopped that now because I read they were.

Oh trust me. I only go on wiki for general info. I know it's not completely reliable enough for me to use it for important news or a dictionary or encyclo but I did hear something about improving it's quality, as well.

but beside wiki and reading it on here, it is true the H3 is being made by the W co. and Rob's not coming back.

Saw it last night.

*Spoilers*
It was by FAR the WORST piece of shit I have ever seen. A horse? Seriously? What the hell was that? This is NOT a Halloween film. I have no clue what it was. It didn't even look like Michael Myers, it looked like Bigfoot mixed with a street bum, and santa claus (the beard). And there was this one pointless scene where he kills everybody in a strip club, for no reason. But it wasn't entirely pointless, because the girl did get naked. The whole movie just didn't even make sense.

Right before I went into the movie, me and all of my friends and even my girlfriend, we all said "This better not suck." (all at the same time). And it did. Horrible, horrible movie.

This film made Resurrection look like a masterpiece.

A horse? Seriously? What the hell was that?

Read Revelation 19(I think) in the Bible, Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse too.

11And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.

12His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.

13And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.

14And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

15And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

16And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.

17And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God;

18That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great.

19And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army.

20And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.

21And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.

And so on.

Originally posted by MildPossession
Read Revelation 19(I think) in the Bible, Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse too.

And so on.

Yeah, but this is Halloween. I am a Christian, but in movies like Halloween I'm not too interested in seeing horses, and also not interested in the child Michael Myers, or his mother, I just want to see him kill people. And I also want to see him in his classic clothes, not wearing some stupid jacket, with a full beard. I was just waiting for him to talk. Nothing could have surprised me. And then there was this one part where some dude was pissing by a tree, then Michael looked like he teleported, because one second he wasn't there, then he suddenly appeared. I think he teleported. Reminded me of Criss Angel.

Originally posted by MildPossession
It does sound right, but I wouldn't take information about film news off places like Wikipedia, anyone can write any old crap on there, unless they have stopped that now because I read they were.

Uh, no, the information put on Wikipedia is moderated, and if there is no citation put up to validate the news, it's taken off rather quickly. They don't just put any kind of information on the site. It's Wikipedia, not IMDB.

If halloween 3 were to happen and

Spoiler:
Mike were to return then he'd be made less human which is what they didn't wanna do in the first place, I mean Mike was meant to be more human and easier to kill...I mean making him more human would do that....yet if he did return then he'd be far from human

Uh, no, the information put on Wikipedia is moderated, and if there is no citation put up to validate the news, it's taken off rather quickly. They don't just put any kind of information on the site. It's Wikipedia, not IMDB.

Yes, and that's why I said unless they have stopped that now..., it use to be that anyone was able to put any crap up, and I saw a lot of wrong information on it that was up for quite some time.

Saying that, I still wouldn't use wikipedia as a source of film news, it's best to use film/film news blogs/official film websites for that.

Oh the director of My Bloody Valentine 3D might be the one to take the role of directing the third Halloween film. Patrick Lussier. Not an amazing track record in directing... he has already worked on a Halloween film though, he was editor on Halloween H20, oo and all three Scream films.

Originally posted by Insomniatric
Saw it last night.

*Spoilers*
It was by FAR the WORST piece of shit I have ever seen. A horse? Seriously? What the hell was that? This is NOT a Halloween film. I have no clue what it was. It didn't even look like Michael Myers, it looked like Bigfoot mixed with a street bum, and santa claus (the beard). And there was this one pointless scene where he kills everybody in a strip club, for no reason. But it wasn't entirely pointless, because the girl did get naked. The whole movie just didn't even make sense.

Right before I went into the movie, me and all of my friends and even my girlfriend, we all said "This better not suck." (all at the same time). And it did. Horrible, horrible movie.

I thought the strip club was the one from the first film where Michaels mother worked?
Or at least that was the impression I got.

Originally posted by mr.smiley
I thought the strip club was the one from the first film where Michaels mother worked?
Or at least that was the impression I got.

Probably, that would really be the only explanation. Unless Michael got bored and decided to kill some random people.

I'll have to skim through the first again.
I thought somewere in the first a text reference was made to the Red Rabbit inn (or whatever it was called).
I could be wrong though.

During a Q&A of HALLOWEEN II, producers Malek Akkad and Andy Gould was pressed for details on the recently announced sequel. Akkadrepeated what was said already: Zombie would not be back for a third round. Akkad, however, jokingly reminded him that the director said he wouldn't return for a sequel after the first film. "There will most likely be a '3,'" Akkad told the audience. "We're trying to figure something out." Lussier is definitely one and because he's toyed with 3-D once already, that is an appealing factor. Akkad said they're currently waiting to see what Lussier's take is going to be.

Do you think the My Bloody Valentine guy will be best for a third film?

Ugh.....3-D seems soo...I dont know.....gimmicky?

Originally posted by mr.smiley
I thought the strip club was the one from the first film where Michaels mother worked?
Or at least that was the impression I got.

Originally posted by Insomniatric
Probably, that would really be the only explanation. Unless Michael got bored and decided to kill some random people.

It is. There was even a huge poster of her on the outside of the club. Same picture the kids were taunting him with in the first movie.

But yeah, this movie was pretty bad.

No, it wasn't the same picture from the first movie, she was in a completely different pose. You forget, it was the strip club she WORKED at, I doubt they'd continue using the same picture over & over again.

You either watched these movies too much or...you have a good memory