Indiana Jones versus John McClane......

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
So what do you base your assessment that Indy is the tougher..?
Look at him whining like a beeoytch to Marian on the boat after the truck sequence... McClane wouldnt have moaned AND he'd have fu**ed Marion too. The energizer bunny'd still be on the job.

Indy gets his ass beat all time too, by less trained opponents than Mcclane is used to..

Well McClane doesnt need anything in this case and you miss again the most significant point: That he is resourceful inventive enough to to utilise peripheral ways of killing in extremely well timed moments..

Oh Indy beat soldiers..? Watch Die Hard 2.

Again Indy IV means shit by your own "In their prime" rule.

Oh he KOs guys with one punch..? So does McClane.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth

There is many a grain of truth in that. 😛
*buh-boom*

I woudn't argue in this spite thread, RJ made it with a clear agenda; any facts you bring in will fall on non-existant ears.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Right. Immediately springing to mind:

Just before McClane walks into the vault floor to rescue Holly from Hans, he punches the Italian looking dude out in one punch sending barer bonds flying across the floor.

Which nicely mirrors what I have done to your point.

Still laughing...?
😮‍💨

And BTW, Indy did the same to a guy in the temple of doom, with his FISTS.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
If I remember right, he used the butt of his machine gun, not his fist. Youtubing it now.

And BTW, Indy did the same to a guy in the temple of doom, with his FISTS.

Well you dont. He punched him. In a mirrored moment with Argyle punching out the computer nerd.

Oh wowwwwwwwwwwwww. You mean he forfilled the most basic requirement in any action movie hero against much weaker oppostion than Mcclane would have to offer...

Robtard's right.
Spite thread.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
No we arent. Just "In their prime" Which is raiders, at Indy's age.
And McClanes was Die Hard 2.

WTF are you talking about? But since YOU bring up luck, yes McClane is luckier than Indy too. Indys luck is sourced form his lucky zippo. A zippo that he could lose.
McClane is the luckiest son of a bi**h ever to have walked this earth.

The point is: "No son like that would ever emerge from McClane's loins." 😛

Well they hadnt happened by Raiders, had they...?
So you are breaking............ the thread starters rules. 😖

But yes Im quite happy to compare feats/kill records of all four the Die hard movies against Indy's record including Indy 4.

Cause it'd just widen the gap that McClane would win by.

AGAIN with the body count bullshit? 😆 You might wanna see a doctor about that broken leg.

Think on it like this....It took McClaine an entire movie to take out the amount of bad guys that Indy took out in five minutes while chasing down the Ark. 😮‍💨

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Well you dont. He punched him. In a mirrored moment with Argyle punching out the computer nerd.

PWNED

YouTube video

Its the fourth time you have stated something happened in a movie that DIDN'T happen. Blub blub blub..........better get in a life boat...Blub blub blub.....

Oh wowwwwwwwwwwwww. You mean he forfilled the most basic requirement in any action movie hero against much weaker oppostion than Mcclane would have to offer...

Robtard's right.
Spite thread.

Hah. Made you look. 😛

You make it sound like Indy defeated all the nazis.
McClane defeated all his opponents. The Nazis despite Indy went and did all that 1939-1945 stuff.

McClane stopped the German effort against america almost single handedly.

If its bullshit that this is a spite thread, then why the McClane broken glass conversation reference in you opening post?

PWNED

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi

Bullshit and you know it.

So you made this thread with an objective mindset and you weren't 100% sure who'd win in your mind? Really now.

Bullshit and YOU know it.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi

[b] Right, Nazis are pussies compared to a buncha eurotrash led by a sissy with a nice suit. 🙄

What, Indy also fights Germans? We all know that Germans are peak physical and learn jujutso from birth.

Edit: I erred, it's Brazilain Jiu-Jitsu, Indy must be such a bad-ass

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
No rules are being broken here. Indy from all 4 movies, McClaine from all 4 movies. It's quite simple.

AGAIN with the body count bullshit? 😆 You might wanna see a doctor about that broken leg.

Think on it like this....It took McClaine an entire movie to take out the amount of bad guys that Indy took out in five minutes while chasing down the Ark. 😮‍💨

There is NO logic whatsoever in you saying that.
In his prime, he hadnt done the feats you mention.
With no regard to logic there is nothing to discuss here.

Oh yes. Cause how many people a man is killed has no relevance whatsoever in a death fighting thread. 🙄

What McClanes killed more with his zippo in Diehard2 than Indy killed on that truck without having to have his ass served like Indy got all the way through that sequence..

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth

Oh yes. Cause how many people a man is killed has no relevance whatsoever in a death fighting thread. 🙄

Depends, were they Russian or German? Because that clearly counts as being a greater feat, clearly.

Originally posted by Robtard
So you made this thread with an objective mindset and you weren't 100% sure who'd win in your mind? Really now.

Bullshit and YOU know it.

Yeah, I had the mindset that Indy would win, so? You telling me that every thread started here, the thread starter isn't on the least bit favoring one of the two fighters? You trying to tell me they are 50/50 as to who would win?

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Hah. Made you look. 😛

You make it sound like Indy defeated all the nazis.
McClane defeated all his opponents. The Nazis despite Indy went and did all that 1939-1945 stuff.

McClane stopped the German effort against america almost single handedly.

If its bullshit that this is a spite thread, then why the McClane broken glass conversation reference in you opening post?

PWNED

Originally posted by Robtard
What, Indy also fights Germans? We all know that Germans are peak physical and learn jujutso from birth.

Edit: I erred, it's Brazilain Jiu-Jitsu, Indy must be such a bad-ass

Sorry about that.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
There is NO logic whatsoever in you saying that.
In his prime, he hadnt done the feats you mention.
With no regard to logic there is nothing to discuss here.

Oh yes. Cause how many people a man is killed has no relevance whatsoever in a death fighting thread. 🙄

What McClanes killed more with his zippo in Diehard2 than Indy killed on that truck without having to have his ass served like Indy got all the way through that sequence..

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Yeah, I had the mindset that Indy would win, so? You telling me that every thread started here, the thread starter isn't on the least bit favoring one of the two fighters? You trying to tell me they are 50/50 as to who would win?

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight....You made a bullshit assumption and I buried it. Next question please?

You are talking about an army of millions compared to terrorist groups ranging from 15 to 20 members. Think about it.

And Indy stopped them in Indy 1 and 3, and the towelheads in Indy 2. Not to mention the Russians in Indy 4. Point?

Because I knew you and Robtard would come in here giving McClaine head, starting shit left and right, so I had to at least TRY to get things rolling in a fun fashion.

Okay. That question will be, how come you keep backing losers?

No. It is you who should have thought about it before drawing that comparison.

Arguing with logic....mean allusions to sex acts?
You're sick f**k.
And racist too.

Point being, genius, that Indy IV hadnt happened in Indy's Prime.

And in a "in their prime thread", that notion of later feats is brain dead.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Mhm.....I can read you like a book. Sarcasm is usually your last line of defense. 😄 It's like you are buried up to your neck in the desert and the rabid ants are approaching.

Sorry about that.

Not my fault you cant keep up.

When it's a one on one matchup, there is no relevance.

Well, Indy doing it the old fashioned way compared to McClaine doing something a crippled retard could do shows that Indy is by far more badass.

Again. Wonderful projections you put out on people.
Tells me a lot about you see yourself.

Keep up with what...? Theres no logic to keep up with.

Well you SAY you could have done it, but would you have made it onto the wing and fought the guys off long enough to get that cap open...? I dont think so. Indy couldnt have done it either. Not the old Indy who fell of that track car in Indy IV.
(Since you are so keen to bring other feats from times outside thread specification)

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Yeah, I had the mindset that Indy would win, so? You telling me that every thread started here, the thread starter isn't on the least bit favoring one of the two fighters? You trying to tell me they are 50/50 as to who would win?

Obviously not every thread, as you've contributed quite a few. I'd guess those making the threads do favor one guy and that's to be expected, but they're willing to hear the opposition before cementing their view. You make a thread with a clear agenda and twist/bend anything to make it work.

This is a clear spite-thread, trying to say it isn't only makes you look worse.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Mhm.....I can read you like a book. Sarcasm is usually your last line of defense. 😄 It's like you are buried up to your neck in the desert and the rabid ants are approaching.

Hahaha, ya, you sure can, considering I already blatantly said to Sadako that debating here is pointless (2nd thread on this very page, genius), since it's a clear spite-thread, besides being a thread made by you.

I'm not debating in here, I'm mocking your failed logic, do try to keep up.

"Russians!" "Nazis!", hahahaha.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Okay. That question will be, how come you keep backing losers?

No. It is you who should have thought about it before drawing that comparison.

Arguing with logic....mean allusions to sex acts?
You're sick f**k.
And racist too.

Point being, genius, that Indy IV hadnt happened in Indy's Prime.

And in a "in their prime thread", that notion of later feats is brain dead.

Point is, BRAINIAC, it's Indy from all 4 movies and McClaine from all 4 movies. Everything they did in all 4 movies comes into play here. 8 movies, all feats count. Get it got it GOOD.

If you dont understand that concept, then maybe you should refrain from spamming a perfectly good thread.

Dont be offended by this, but until you list them you are full of shit. You have inifintely more fails on your record, buddy.
So I guarantee that I have less respect for yours.
I was wrong once here which is a nice change for me, by seems to be you everyday way of life.
The other threads are full of fail posts by you.

Yes and Mcclane wins, thusly, got it...? Probably not but I dont care anymore.

What like you did on the McClane/Riggs thread, you mean.
The debater who cites logic compared to the one who cant and has to personally attack people when they dont get their own way is not gonna be the spammiest of the two, know what Im saying?

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Again. Wonderful projections you put out on people.
Tells me a lot about you see yourself.

Keep up with what...? Theres no logic to keep up with.

Well you SAY you could have done it, but would you have made it onto the wing and fought the guys off long enough to get that cap open...? I dont think so. Indy couldnt have done it either. Not the old Indy who fell of that track car in Indy IV.
(Since you are so keen to bring other feats from times outside thread specification)

Something nice for this shit thread, enjoy.