Originally posted by Sadako of GirthI aint offended, you dont have what it takes to offend me. 😄
Dont be offended by this, but until you list them you are full of shit. You have inifintely more fails on your record, buddy.
I was wrong once here which is a nice chage for me, by seems to be you everyday way of life.Sure they are, Champ!!!
The other threads are full of fail posts by you.
Yes and Mcclane wins, thusly, got it...? Probably not but I dont care anymore.Just cuz, right? 🙄
What like you did on the McClane/Riggs thread, you mean.Sure, it was ALL me.
Originally posted by RobtardI am willing to listen to "arguments", but I have no tolerance for someone arguing "just cuz", which is what you are doing.
Obviously not every thread, as you've contributed quite a few. I'd guess those making the threads do favor one guy and that's to be expected, but they're willing to hear the opposition before cementing their view. You make a thread with a clear agenda and twist/bend anything to make it work.
This is a clear spite-thread, trying to say it isn't only makes you look worse.Afraid not.
Hahaha, ya, you sure can, considering I already blatantly said to Sadako that debating here is pointless (2nd thread on this very page, genius), since it's a clear spite-thread, besides being a thread made by you.If its a "clear spite thread" and "pointless" to post here, why do you bother? Hmm?I'm not debating in here, I'm mocking your failed logic, do try to keep up.
"Russians!" "Nazis!", hahahaha.
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthAAAAAAAAAAAnd there it is, bringing up other threads as a defense.
Well....yes. You threw your toys out the pram when confronted with logic, facts and multiple evidenced reasons why Riggs is inferior than Riggs.
There are no facts nor is there logic here, there are only OPINIONS.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I am willing to listen to "arguments", but I have no tolerance for someone arguing "just cuz", which is what you are doing.Afraid not.
If its a "clear spite thread" and "pointless" to post here, why do you bother? Hmm?
I'll take that challenge, where have I argued "just cuz"? Go on, show me up, boy.
It obviously is, I don't except you to admit it.
Maybe to mock your post because it's a silly spite-thread? I said this and you did read it.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
AAAAAAAAAAAnd there it is, bringing up other threads as a defense.There are no facts nor is there logic here, there are only OPINIONS.
Yes because it was relevant....and...?
Nope. Wrong again.
The facts that I reported all those kill totals, facts and figures, the Resume, all that was fact taken from the movies and is sanctioned by Movie kill counts site.
Thats not opinion.
Originally posted by Robtard
I'll take that challenge, where have I argued "just cuz"? Go on, show me up, boy.It obviously is, I don't except you to admit it.
Maybe to mock your post because it's a silly spite-thread? I said this and you did read it.
Boy? 😆 OK, you are the Alpha make here. 😆 Feel better? Superior? Cuz I know you need that.
You came in this thread with the whole "just cuz" defense. And you launched right into the spite bullshit.
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthOne thing has nothing to do with the other, dude.
Yes because it was relevant....and...?Nope. Wrong again.
The facts that I reported all those kill totals, facts and figures, the Resume, all that was fact taken from the movies and is sanctioned by Movie kill counts site.
Thats not opinion.
OK, lets break this down. McClaine from DH1 versus The Pikey in Snatch. Who wins h2h?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Boy? 😆 OK, you are the Alpha make here. 😆 Feel better? Superior? Cuz I know you need that.You came in this thread with the whole "just cuz" defense. And you launched right into the spite bullshit.
So in lieu of proving yourself correct after you accused and I challenged you to prove that accusation, you turn to foolery as a last resort.
I never argued "just cuz", my first post was a mock and I started my first post with "lol at spite-thread", not the other way around, genius.
Originally posted by RobtardProve it how? Your post speaks volumes. Of course YOU wont see it.
So in lieu of proving yourself correct after you accused and I challenged you to prove that accusation, you turn to foolery as a last resort.I never argued "just cuz", my first post was a mock and I initially started my first post with "lol at spite-thread", not the other way around, genius.
Originally posted by Robtard
Well, you can quote my post and point out where I debated with a "just cuz" tactic; it shouldn't be that hard if it's there. Go on and show me up, boy.
....tick tock tick tock tick tock tick tock......
*Tumbleweeds blow in the distance*
*The crowd waits expectantly*
*The occasional hotdog is sold on the stands*
Originally posted by Robtard
Well, you can quote my post and point out where I debated with a "just cuz" tactic; it shouldn't be that hard if it's there. Go on and show me up, boy.
Boy crylaugh What is it that you are trying to compensate for? Hmm? Insults are one thing. Jackass, idiot, moron, these are all well and good. But "Boy?"
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Boy crylaugh What is it that you are trying to compensate for? Hmm? Insults are one thing. Jackass, idiot, moron, these are all well and good. But "Boy?"
Originally posted by Robtard
So in lieu of proving yourself correct after you accused and I challenged you to prove that accusation, you turn to foolery as a last resort.
It's cool when someone dances and you only have to do a repost to show their foolery.