How is WWII taught in Germany?

Started by lil bitchiness4 pages
Originally posted by Grand-Moff-Gav
They still won though...

They didn't join the war until Perl Harbor.

Had Hitler not attempted to invade Russia, he would have had a certain victory in Europe. America was absent for great part of WWII.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
They didn't join the war until Perl Harbor.

Had Hitler not attempted to invade Russia, he would have had a certain victory in Europe. America was absent for great part of WWII.

...they still won though. Were they on the winning side? Yes.

The point they're making is that even though the US was absent for a great part of the war, people often see them as the great, ultimate liberators of Europe in WWII.

Well, I guess if either Russia or the US had not been involved, it would have looked different.

Originally posted by backdoorman
The point they're making is that even though the US was absent for a great part of the war, people often see them as the great, ultimate liberators of Europe in WWII.
I know that's the point they're making, but to say they didn't win is just downright misleading. Were they the great liberators? No. Did they win, however? Yes.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, I guess if either Russia or the US had not been involved, it would have looked different.

Russia would have been involved either way. If Hitler didn't invade, Stalin would have sooner or later.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, I guess if either Russia or the US had not been involved, it would have looked different.

Yes, it would have looked ridiculous as the Germans couldn't cross the Channel, ran out of oil and wondered what the point of the damn thing was seeing as the whole target was Russia.

Followed by ineivtable economic collapse as the whole thign was propped up by the need for continuous expansion.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Yes, it would have looked ridiculous as the Germans couldn't cross the Channel, ran out of oil and wondered what the point of the damn thing was seeing as [b]the whole target was Russia.

Followed by ineivtable economic collapse as the whole thign was propped up by the need for continuous expansion. [/B]

They could have expanded South then used to oil from the mid-East to fuel a war against everyone else . . .

I know that's the point they're making, but to say they didn't win is just downright misleading. Were they the great liberators? No. Did they win, however? Yes.

When Magee said that the USA didn't "win" the war, he meant it as in saying that it wasn't the USA proper that won the war, that it was a shared effort propagated by a number of nations. It was obvious by the context that he wasn't saying the USA was not on the winning side.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Yes, it would have looked ridiculous as the Germans couldn't cross the Channel, ran out of oil and wondered what the point of the damn thing was seeing as [b]the whole target was Russia.

Followed by ineivtable economic collapse as the whole thign was propped up by the need for continuous expansion. [/B]

So...what you are saying is it would have been better just to go after Russia?

It would have been better not to base the entire country on an expansionist model leading to inevitable war with the most of the rest of the world at all. Germany geared itself for such expansionism, taking advantage of a West that was tired of war and very indlugent towards its defeated middle, and pushed forwards depending on the fact that noner of the other western coutnries thought that Germany would be stupid enough to continue such action, because it would so obviously ultimately fail.

Which is precisely what happened, but Germany tore the continent apart playing its pointless role in that drama and set uo a modern world where Europe lost its role as the world's centre.

'A Warning from History' it has been called. Damn right.

Originally posted by backdoorman
When Magee said that the USA didn't "win" the war, he meant it as in saying that it wasn't the USA proper that won the war, that it was a shared effort propagated by a number of nations. It was obvious by the context that he wasn't saying the USA was not on the winning side.
I wasn't replying to that. I was replying to lil bitchiness' reply to Grand-Moff-Gav. I know what the original context meant, I was just continuing on with Gav's thought.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
They could have expanded South then used to oil from the mid-East to fuel a war against everyone else . . .

They didn't have the resources to stretch a war that far, and in any case that woukd have brought them into conflict with Russia anyway.

Where, exactly, would they have invaded, anyway? Where would their living space be? You think they would have gone for India instead perhaps? I rather doubt it.

Originally posted by Darth Macabre
I wasn't replying to that. I was replying to lil bitchiness' reply to Grand-Moff-Gav. I know what the original context meant, I was just continuing on with Gav's thought.

Well, she was also not claiming the US wasn't on the winning side. She was just expounding what Magee was saying.

Originally posted by backdoorman
Well, she was also not claiming the US wasn't on the winning side. She was just expounding what Magee was saying.
You're really taking this seriously, aren't you? I said I agreed with you...what else do you want me to say? 😗

Originally posted by Darth Macabre
...they still won though. Were they on the winning side? Yes.

The Spanish and the Dutch were on the winning side in American war of Independence. Therefore, by your logic Spain and Dutch Republic won American war of Independence.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
The Spanish and the Dutch were on the winning side in American war of Independence. Therefore, by your logic Spain and Dutch Republic won American war of Independence.

You don't think that the US involvement in the War was a deciding factor of the, well, quicker victory to the Allies?

You know who won world war 2?

The bankers.

Originally posted by lord xyz
You know who won world war 2?

The bankers.

and it has all come full circle....

maybe we should gather those "bankers" up and find a permanent solution

Originally posted by inimalist
and it has all come full circle....

maybe we should gather those "bankers" up and find a permanent solution

Would it be annoying if I brought up the venus project?

Originally posted by lord xyz
Would it be annoying if I brought up the venus project?

not personally

though it isn't really related to the fact you said the victors of WW2 were bankers, which is a universal term for "jews"