Lol, I dunno, fire balls give him the range advantage, and Mario has all sorts of wierd power ups.
alot of people don't want to consider that the plumber can win this one because of how rediculous it seems.. but consider Mario's feats.
He's outrun and jumped on giant cartoon bullets, smashed bricks with his head, jumped ten times his own height or morewithout a running start, consistently bested a villain who has the technology available to assemble a galaxy bustign armada, and survived being thrown into the sun. (and is usually more pissed he lost than that he got immolated.) Mario consistently bests Bowser with his bare hands. =P I think he can take Kratos.
Edit; Mario also survived the destruction of a galaxy.
Originally posted by MadMel1. Toonforce feat, not to be taken seriously in a vs. thread.
mario could very well match kratos in strength, having lifted not only bowser in SM64, but one of bowser's castles in SMW 😬
but mario is not immune to bigh arse sword-on-chains, so he ultimately loses..
Kratos is stronger, as of the new GoW3 trailer faster and more agile, more durable, and has a bigger variety of powers.
Originally posted by Burning thought
Can it be proven he is invincible? what feats has he shown surviving with the star?
There is nothing shown, canon or otherwise, of Mario ever being harmed while using a star.
And lifting Bowser's castle really isn't as rediculous as Mario surviving the destruction of a galaxy. Mario has great strength and greater durability.
So whats the strongest thing that has hit it? w/e it is, that is the stars durability. Invincibiliy is a no limits fallacy.
Can you prove the weight of the castle? it may not be as heavy as those in the real world, the castle may be under the same rules as mario, e.g., a fat plumber can lift it, perhaps the castle is also light.