Optimus Prime vs. King Kong

Originally posted by Robtard
Really don't understand the "Prime is just stronger" fanboy rants that have peppered this page early on.

2005 Kong's said to weigh 20 to 60 tons.

A Peterbuilt 379 weighs 15-18 tons, depending on various sites. Now we could argue that Prime magically gains mass when he transforms, but that would be silly or that the materials he's made of are heavier than steel cos they're alien, but logically, they could as easily be lighter.

So even going with Kong's lowest rating of 20 tons, he's heavier and would need more strength to move his frame about 🙂

I'm not going to argue about who's stronger... but Prime is definitely tougher. Kong won't survive the kind of thrashing Prime has gone through.

Originally posted by Robtard

Let us also not forget that Kong's body is durable enough to dead fall 440 meters right onto concrete and not turn into strawberry jelly. Clearly he's ridiculously more durable than just a gorilla, comparatively speaking.

not to mention that according the laws of gravity and pyshiology, well lets just quote "You can drop a mouse down a thousand-yard mine shaft; and, on arriving at the bottom, it gets a slight shock and walks away, provided that the ground is fairly soft. A rat is killed, a man is broken, a horse splashes".

because of kongs ridiculous size and weight, he'd have to be more durable in even when scaled/compared to a gorilla or he would have sprayed all of midtown with a coat of red.

🙂

Won't be long before hilariously off accusations of Prime hating begin.

Pick any of the incarnations of Prime you like.

Against Kong it would be no different.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
yes we could certainly use animated if you refer to the 1985 movie. the canon of film was not specified.

sorry if my perfectly relevant point sends you into a glittery rage.

🙄 You clearly ignored the point, yet again. The only reason why you can argue semantics is that the OP couldn't access the intended pictures of both characters' modern versions.

based on nothing the OP stated or posted anywhere in this thread.

if no specific film is stated or pictured, then all film canon is relevant.

but please: get madder, continue disregarding forum protocol, and make up more of your special rules. baby

Or even be bothered to mention which versions/set conditions.
No lack of img posting ability accounts for that.
(In an all versus forum)
Therefore that excuse won't wash.

EDIT: I see focus pipped me to the post on that

LOL at the outright troll tactics being used by Saddie and Chump.
Again, your entire argument rests on the fact that the pictures the OP presented are not accessible. That is some PA-PHUCKING-THETIC bullshit, I must say 😆

Ooooh glitter rage...! 😄

More empty posturing and histrionics in lieu of and actual countering argument..your consistency is admirable.

Originally posted by Lestov16
/thread

The thread ends here. I have the last word. Any post made after this is pure butthurt.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
good so since it was not in the OP that it was 2005 kong exclusively, then its clear that you are being nothing more
than a combative troll...with nothing better to do than dodge the very point that blows your whole argument to pieces. 👆

Yep. We'll keep ignoring your retard argument, which you only have because the OP's pictures aren't accessible, and you'll keep ignoring everybody, because you're a troll. 😆

We have that argument because it stipulated nowhere at all which versions it should be limited to.

Cry on, Liz....continue crying those sweet tears....we're all thirsty.

also before the recent bump, this thread had no activity since long before you joined here.

so stop acting like you knew which kong it was. goddamn ridiculous posturing clown go cry yourself to sleep

LOL You're saying that the now-unavailable pictures the OP posted weren't of '05 Kong and Bay Optimus? Are you going to say the OP originally posted a picture of Kong vs Godzilla Kong? Enjoy the retard train, chumpy. 😆

Originally posted by Robtard
The truck would win.

WTF happened to this, Rob? Stop trying to cover for your buddy's failed argument. you'll only embarrass yourself as well.

ok i get it that you are a really big deal here, but you can't just delegitimize a factual, relevant,
and fair observation on the OP and forum rules wiith snark and chest-beating.

Chumpy is riding that retard train like Baron Samedi 😆

Hey, Chumpy McTard, guess what? The OP originally posted pictures. That means he had specific versions of the character that he was putting in this match, and it's virtually impossible not to reason that he was referring to the latest incarnations of the character. Your shitty argument that since the pictures aren't available, we can use any incarnation of the character we want, is ridiculously stupid and just shows how pathetic and lame your debating skills are that you must resort to such troll tactics.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
based on nothing the OP stated or posted anywhere in this thread.

if no specific film is stated or pictured, then all film canon is relevant.

but please: get madder, continue disregarding forum protocol, and make up more of your special rules. baby

😐

Are you seriously dedicating the crux of your argument on a url error?

Try quoting the OP:

"[img OH LOOK WHAT WE HAVE HERE]http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/1/15179/328316-43370-optimus-prime_super.jpg[/img]"

vs.

"[imgOH LOOK WHAT WE HAVE HERE]http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/0/77/259563-135666-king-kong_super.jpg[/img]"

Oh, look, images were embedded in the original OP, but the pages went down!

Guess what? The images were originally of the characters’ latest incarnations.

It takes a special level of sophistic double-speak to argue that a domain error invalidates the obvious intentions of the OP. I mean, we’re talking epic levels of dick-hole here. Coming from you.

Thank you Han, for irrefutably proving Chumpy to be the trolling dick that he is. 🙂

Still bummed that Prime loses h2h to Kong?

Yup. Sounds like it.

before this thread was bumped on: Aug 17th, 2013,

there was no activity since: Feb 23rd, 2009.

so how exactly do you guys know which kong was depicted?

🙂

:edit: unless we can get Trackz back to clarify the premise im afraid default forum rules apply.

:edit 2: 🙂

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Still bummed that Prime loses h2h to Kong?

😆 Way to shift goalposts, buddy. Marvelous sportsmanship like yours is what maintains my faith in humanity through society's ups and downs.

Transformers have demonstrably taken multi-thousand ton bombs, and Prime in particular has literally ripped Decipticons apart with his bare hands. This version of King Kong struggled immensely to rip through some steel chains, and then died to some pre-WWII biplanes.

Furthermore, IDK why you and chump are so obsessed with H2H combat, when Prime has both melee and ranged weaponry built into his body.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
before this thread was bumped on: Aug 17th, 2013,

there was no activity since: Feb 23rd, 2009.

so how exactly do you guys know which kong was depicted?

🙂

:edit: unless we can get Trackz back to clarify the premise im afraid default forum rules apply.

:edit 2: 🙂

Sadako should clarify for us, then.

But don't try playing dumb; you originally claimed that the OP specified nothing.