Originally posted by Master Han
😆 Buddy, it's clear from the way you phrase this accusation that you have no understanding about said "basic workings of physics", and are attempting to bluff me.Fine then. Tell me where I go wrong.
You took a position of "Its not Kinetic energy, Its momentum"
If you POTENTIALly understand anything, you will see the hilarity in what you said.
Holy sh*t, you have no f*cking clue what you're talking about.
As seen above, its not you whom should be saying that to anyone.
We're not comparing durability here. As Kong [b]doesn't have weapons, I feel no need to prove that Prime can tank tank rounds and missile strikes (although anyone who actually watched the movies wouldn't question that he could).
He has weapons. Arms/egs and four fists, superior strength, teeth, and can thrown things at Prime witht he sort of force that would dent the shit out of Prime, koncking him over and maybe (depending on what is thrown) breaking him.
In your desperation you have over extended and tried to make out like Kong is a unable to do anything other than dribble and blow fart noises.
We're comparing Prime's firepower with Kong's hide. And you have done nothing to establish that Kong's hide would win.
You have done nothing that establishes that Prime could hit Kong and kill him 100% before Kong takes him out.
The reverse doesn't matter because Kong isn't getting the first hit in...because he has no range capabilities. What part of this don't you understand?
I dont understand why you think you're dictating the thread, or where you think that would get you.
Pulling an OJ Simpson defense is going to help you here. We don't need to know "precisely" what their yield is, and IDK how "which type of energy" (😆) they "draw their source" from is relevant here. What is relevant is that Kong has never demonstrated the ability to tank uranium shots and missile strikes, and Prime's guns are superior to those.
YOU do when making absolutist statements though.
So you admit you don't know WTF you're on about. Good.
From 4:30 here:Now, Prime here:
Notice that Prime's shots are vastly superior to, what are those - A10s?
Now, has Kong ever tanked the firepower we see scorponok tank?
Oops, no.
Oh dear. Another embarrassing display of ignorance by you.
You admit above that you have no idea of the properties of Prime's weapons. Why you would then effectively suicide your credibility by following up with presenting those as beingmore powerful than those browning rounds surely falls into self hating masochism on your part.
He blows up a few gas tanks. Big deal.
But hey it looks shiny and colourful and there was slow mo and 'moving' music so therefore its scientifically proven then, right? :rolleyes"
Scorponok didn't exactly tank it. his ass was blown off.
Something that you may have glossed over in your rush.
We're not talking about H2H buddy. Try again.
Because you keep pissing your knickers and running when its mentioned, perhaps? ✅
Who said Prime "has" to run behind his guns? It's just that
he can, and therefore he will win. I don't want to talk about h2h until you concede that guns > flesh. [/B]
You do, actually, in refusing constantly to discuss H2H.
Mosquitos can attack flesh too. Do they insta kill with their bites? Kong has shown tanking ability and is bigger than Prime and has serious durability.
T-Rexes also "> Flesh" but look what happened to 'them...
Your admitted ignorance of what Primes weapons are and how they work whilst definitely being sure that they are superior to a serious heavy cal weapons on Earth (even though they are shown knocking down, damaging and sometimes killing BayTFs) has rendered your argument as arbitrary and easily dismissible.