Watchmen

Started by srankmissingnin50 pages
Originally posted by jalek moye
What the ****, so we might not even get to see this movie

You almost certainly will see it. Will you see it in March though? I doubt it.

Who done it?

20th Best-tury Fox?

-AC

*Raises hand*
I don't get it.

Originally posted by jalek moye
What the ****, so we might not even get to see this movie

You will. There's too much money to be made for it not to be released. They'll eventually settle and Warner will have to relinquish some of the money the movie/paraphernalia generates over to Fox.

http://www.superherohype.com/news/watchmennews.php?id=7962

Watchmen Release Date Decision on Jan. 20
Source:Los Angeles Times
January 7, 2009

The Los Angeles Times says that lawyers for 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros. have agreed to let a federal judge decide whether Warner Bros. will be allowed to release Watchmen on March 6, forgoing a jury trial that could have put the high-profile film's future into even longer limbo.

In court papers filed Monday with U.S. District Judge Gary A. Feess, attorneys for Fox and Warner Bros. jointly said they would let the judge decide Jan. 20 whether Fox could block the film's theatrical distribution as Fox has been seeking all along as part of its copyright infringement lawsuit against Warner Bros.

In a preliminary ruling issued Dec. 24, Feess said Fox, and not Watchmen producer and distributor Warner Bros., owned the right to distribute the film. Warner Bros. is a unit of Time Warner Inc., and Fox is owned by News Corp.

In his December ruling, the judge urged the warring studios to negotiate a settlement, but no deal has been reached.

Originally posted by Anti-Monitor
http://www.superherohype.com/news/watchmennews.php?id=7962

Watchmen Release Date Decision on Jan. 20
Source:Los Angeles Times
January 7, 2009

The Los Angeles Times says that lawyers for 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros. have agreed to let a federal judge decide whether Warner Bros. will be allowed to release Watchmen on March 6, forgoing a jury trial that could have put the high-profile film's future into even longer limbo.

In court papers filed Monday with U.S. District Judge Gary A. Feess, attorneys for Fox and Warner Bros. jointly said they would let the judge decide Jan. 20 whether Fox could block the film's theatrical distribution as Fox has been seeking all along as part of its copyright infringement lawsuit against Warner Bros.

In a preliminary ruling issued Dec. 24, Feess said Fox, and not Watchmen producer and distributor Warner Bros., owned the right to distribute the film. Warner Bros. is a unit of Time Warner Inc., and Fox is owned by News Corp.

In his December ruling, the judge urged the warring studios to negotiate a settlement, but no deal has been reached.

ya know I'm thinking that if this actually does come out I hope it is a success

And it might actually be the best Alan Moore adaptation so far.

A scheduled Tuesday court conference between Fox and Warner Bros. attorneys has been cancelled, fueling talk that a settlement in the contentious Watchmen case is imminent.

Fox sued Warners last February, saying the studio infringed on its rights to make the comic book adaptation. In December, when federal judge Gary A. Feess ruled that Fox has distribution rights to the film, Warners faced the prospect of having the film's March 6 release blocked.

Settlement talks between the two sides became serious over the weekend and continued to heat up yesterday.

A settlement could cost Warners tens of millions of dollars as Fox is reportedly asking for upfront fees as well as a percentage of the back-end.

http://www.superherohype.com/news/watchmennews.php?id=7983

Warner Bros. and Twentieth Century Fox have resolved their dispute regarding the rights to the upcoming motion picture Watchmen in a confidential settlement. Warner Bros acknowledges that Fox acted in good faith in bringing its claims, which were asserted prior to the start of principal photography. Fox acknowledges that Warner Bros. acted in good faith in defending against those claims Warner Bros. and Fox, like all Watchmen fans, look forward with great anticipation to this film's March 6 release in theatres.

http://www.superherohype.com/news/watchmennews.php?id=7989

'bout damn time.

Looks like Fox finally grew some brains.

Overall, I don't really care who gets what percentage of the profits, as long as I see the movie how/when it was intended to be seen by Snyder and co.

Fox screwed warner brothers is what they did, this is total fraudulant ass bull, why the judge didnt see that is because the system doesnt work but enough of the rant..............IM GLAD ITS COMING OUT i dont know if warners is as glad since there going to have to share half there hard earned proffits with fox who did jack shit for the movie.

"oh gracious me was i raving im sorry im mad" gemini killer from exorcist 3

Whats this stuff about Warner Bros might have plans for a sequal or a Prequal ??

I hope it does't happen, I'm with Dave Gibbons it just does'nt need either one

as he said

"If you try to add anything to Watchmen, you're not enriching it, you're diluting it," he continued. "Sure, you can tell another adventure of Batman or Spider-Man, but ("Watchmen"😉 is like a complete story, and certainly, while I'm very supportive of this and I'm very thrilled by what they've done with it, I think if someone mentioned to me about doing a prequel or sequel, my impression is that you won't get Zack Snyder directing it, so my counsel would be 'Leave well enough alone.'" (This got a big cheer, so take note, Warner Bros.)

Just to be sure... Snyder didn't change the end, eh?

i remember hearing he changed the Giant Squid don't know what to.

Originally posted by Kazenji
i remember hearing he changed the Giant Squid don't know what to.
Spoiler:
ozy convinces dr manhatten destroy new york instead instead of the alien

Anyone, besides AC have any problem with that? Sure I want it faithful as possible, but the squid was kind of lame, and this could work.

Well i know Dave Gibbons has said there are some things that may have worked in the comic but just would'nt work when it comes to a movie.

Originally posted by hugekent
Anyone, besides AC have any problem with that? Sure I want it faithful as possible, but the squid was kind of lame, and this could work.

I did think it was a little out there although it also showed what level he was playing on.