runner vs black racer

Started by Enyalus7 pages
Enyalus MALE DOMINANCE!!!

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Final Crisis was nice. The drawing, the story. It was confusing, but I liked it. Especially FC:Revelation

FC: Revelation was a tie-in. Like Superman Beyond. And a lot of the tie-ins were great. The main 7 issue storyline though? Blowtastic. And its not because, "oh no, Eny, you just didn't understand Morrison's complexity and the metafiction!!" And to anyone holding that opinion, I say piss off. I understood it just fine. If I can read and understand Aristotle's Metaphysics in Greek and write 30-page arguments against Locke's "I Know Not What," then I think I'm perfectly qualified for comprehending a freakin' comic book.

Which I did. And it sucked.

Mindset Senior Member

I think you just didn't understand it, bro.

kgkg Vigilante

Originally posted by Enyalus
I wouldn't own Final Crisis if they paid me.

That's how badly it sucked.

People have mixed feelings about it.

I found it OK.

I just don't understand those calling it the "best arc in decades" 😉

Enyalus MALE DOMINANCE!!!

Originally posted by Mindset
I think you just didn't understand it, bro.


*sigh*

Ya got me...didn't want to admit it. Bruised ego and all.

xJLxKing Senior Member

Originally posted by Enyalus
FC: Revelation was a tie-in. Like Superman Beyond. And a lot of the tie-ins were great. The main 7 issue storyline though? Blowtastic. And its not because, "oh no, Eny, you just didn't understand Morrison's complexity and the metafiction!!" And to anyone holding that opinion, I say piss off. I understood it just fine. If I can read and understand Aristotle's Metaphysics in Greek and write 30-page arguments against Locke's "I Know Not What," then I think I'm perfectly qualified for comprehending a freakin' comic book.

Which I did. And it sucked.


Well they they were Ties in and like you said most of them were good. I didn't know about the ties in the first time I read the FC and it was so confusing.

Any ways, we all have our opinions but personally I liked FC: 3, 6, and 7. They were good. The drawing, story..etc was nice in all of them but 3 6 & 7 are where the story picked up.

Mindset Senior Member

I liked the artwork, that's about it.

But I must not have understood it, only explanation.

kgkg Vigilante

Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Surely there has to be a better scan that shows that the Flashes can go superluminal than this. It wasn't stated on-panel in this scan that they went faster than light at all.
Some flash ie Wally can and have gone FTL. The debate was if BC could , he has shown in the fast that he could as well.

Even if he could go over FTL doesn't mean they are faster than the Runner.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by kgkg
It does if he is unable to do those feat than he can no longer achieve those speed.

Especially when witter clearly put limitations on Flash's speed.

If the writers says he can't than he can't no point bringing his past feat when there are several newer feats which contradict those feats anway 🙂

We go by recent feats at KMC old feats are valid. Yes. But if the character is unable to do it than those feats they are no longer valid.

It's been many years since flash have shown with speed limitation some as low as Gorilla Grodd mind being faster than Wally 🙂

👆

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Enyalus
Darkseid's beams were nearly touching them, too. Supes outmanuevers them easily. Does Supes' speed = Flashes tapping the Speed Force to the limit?
Inconsistencies happen in comics all the time. That's the trouble with going from what someone is capable of in one story to the next.

Flash isn't as fast as he once was. Runner is faster than the flash is currently. That may change in the future, but as it stands now the Runner is the faster of the two.