Swine Flu

Started by Bardock4223 pages

Originally posted by Bicnarok
I didn´t get the "I had sausages for breakfast, and they were GOOOOOOOOOOOOD. " one.

Idiots guide please.

Sausages tend to be made out of swine.

Originally posted by lord xyz
That's actually not true.

humans have no natural defense against Swine Flu, and although the whole epidemic is the same BS pooled out of the media, it has already killed some Mexicans.

JacopeX, Quiero Mota, taft etc, you'd better cover your mouths.

Yeah, 18, 3 less Mexicans than that which died of slipping on a banana skin in the last weak.

And Jacope is puerto rican, isn't he?

Originally posted by Bicnarok
I didn´t get the "I had sausages for breakfast, and they were GOOOOOOOOOOOOD. " one.

Idiots guide please.

Revenge on the swine.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Revenge on the swine.

Lord of the Flies

Originally posted by Bardock42
Sausages tend to be made out of swine.

And ironically sausages are totally free of swine flu.

im not quite sure there is enough education on swine flu

Originally posted by Bardock42

Yeah, 18, 3 less Mexicans than that which died of slipping on a banana skin in the last weak.

And Jacope is puerto rican, isn't he?

Peruvian, I believe.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Sausages tend to be made out of swine.

No shit 😱 I eat em twice a week I know that.

That doesn´t explain the gooooooooood bit though does it?

Or is it American "unfunny" humor?

Originally posted by GCG
im not quite sure there is enough education on swine flu

Surely you mean H1N1?

Originally posted by Robtard
Peruvian, I believe.
What's the dif?

Originally posted by Bicnarok
No shit 😱 I eat em twice a week I know that.

That doesn´t explain the gooooooooood bit though does it?

Or is it American "unfunny" humor?

Well, it is unfunny, and it is American, but I don't think the Americanness is the reason for the unfunniness. Probably more the RJness.

Originally posted by lord xyz
That's actually not true.

humans have no natural defense against Swine Flu, and although the whole epidemic is the same BS pooled out of the media, it has already killed some Mexicans.

JacopeX, Quiero Mota, taft etc, you'd better cover your mouths.

Factually incorrect. If they get over it, they produced the antibodies to "lyse" or "destroy" the virus. 😐

I surprised that you, a person who knew that the body actually has a lot more that "five" senses, didn't know that. It's very much elementary.

Let's put it this way: If you body didn't destroy the virus (faster than it could reproduce), it would go unchecked and get worse and worse until the individual died. 😐

kill 'em all, kill 'em all, kill 'em all!

Originally posted by dadudemon
Factually incorrect. If they get over it, they produced the antibodies to "lyse" or "destroy" the virus. 😐

I surprised that you, a person who knew that the body actually has a lot more that "five" senses, didn't know that. It's very much elementary.

Let's put it this way: If you body didn't destroy the virus (faster than it could reproduce), it would go unchecked and get worse and worse until the individual died. 😐

Think before you type.

I said natural defenses: ones that you are born with via evolution.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Sausages tend to be made out of swine.

Yeah, 18, 3 less Mexicans than that which died of slipping on a banana skin in the last weak.

And Jacope is puerto rican, isn't he?

Ignoring the points: it's a potential killer, passable through humans, continentially, and regular flu itself is a killer in small children.

What if this flu went to places like Africa or India? It'd be pretty bad I think.

Originally posted by lord xyz

Ignoring the points: it's a potential killer, passable through humans, continentially, and regular flu itself is a killer in small children.

What if this flu went to places like Africa or India? It'd be pretty bad I think.

This seems to assume that the prepositioned "swine" somehow makes it a superior flu. Hardly anyone is dying of it and really no one in first world countries...besides children, but who cares about those?

I'm not saying that it can't be bad, and that it can't kill, but it doesn't warrant the coverage it gets.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I surprised that you, a person who knew that the body actually has a lot more that "five" senses, didn't know that. It's very much elementary.

unless you are being pretentious and trying to define each touch receptor as a different "sense", the human body has about 4 senses, as taste and smell are pretty much the same thing.

Somatosensory, visual, olfactory and auditory.

How else do you propose information about the outside world enters the brain?

Originally posted by inimalist
unless you are being pretentious and trying to define each touch receptor as a different "sense", the human body has about 4 senses, as taste and smell are pretty much the same thing.

Somatosensory, visual, olfactory and auditory.

How else do you propose information about the outside world enters the brain?

I think he means what different things that we can perceive, temperature, acceleration, etc. I assume.

I'm not actually knowledgable on the subject so I don't know if it warrants being called different senses or whether it is just our brains capabilities that can compute the data we receive from our senses as such.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I think he means what different things that we can perceive, temperature, acceleration, etc. I assume.

I'm not actually knowledgable on the subject so I don't know if it warrants being called different senses or whether it is just our brains capabilities that can compute the data we receive from our senses as such.

thats sort of what I was asking. Vision I know best, so I'll use that, but ya, it works the exact same for "touch", or maybe even better, because there are literally different types of cellular receptors for acceleration, temperature, proprioception, but they are all considered part of the somatosensory system.

In vision, there are basically 3 types of cones and 1 type of rod. Each of these types could be considered a type of visual sense. However, using that same logic, each rod or cone itself would be its own visual system.

"Visual" "auditory" etc, they are all human constructs to group like systems together. If we get even deeper into neuro-architecture, cross-modal sensory areas come into play, and suddenly it is even difficult to tease out related visual and auditory systems.

However, going by what are considered "primary" sensory processing locations in the brain, which are very localized regions of the brain that essentially process only sensory information, we have 4.

Originally posted by inimalist
unless you are being pretentious and trying to define each touch receptor as a different "sense", the human body has about 4 senses, as taste and smell are pretty much the same thing.

Somatosensory, visual, olfactory and auditory.

How else do you propose information about the outside world enters the brain?

I'm totally going to use that the next time someone says people have more than 5 senses.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Think before you type.

I said natural defenses: ones that you are born with via evolution.

People aren't born with the ability to produce antibodies?

Originally posted by Bardock42
This seems to assume that the prepositioned "swine" somehow makes it a superior flu.
Yes, because there is no natural defenses in the human genome.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Hardly anyone is dying of it and really no one in first world countries...besides children, but who cares about those?
I do, but then again, I'm a sane person.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I'm not saying that it can't be bad, and that it can't kill, but it doesn't warrant the coverage it gets.
I agree. Is that what I'm addressing?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
I'm totally going to use that the next time someone says people have more than 5 senses.

People aren't born with the ability to produce antibodies?

Yeah, but some viruses they know how to destroy, others they don't. That's why some people die from TB, and others survive pancreatic cancer.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Yes, because there is no natural defenses in the human genome.

You know so little about so much, don't you?

Originally posted by lord xyz
I do, but then again, I'm a sane person.

Well, then you should freak out about the non-swine flu instead, way, way, way more children dying of that.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Surely you mean H1N1?

You must work for the Pork Industry.