Hercules vs. Wolverine/Deadpool

Started by OneDumbG015 pages

Battlehammer: Support Wolvie. Don't support him using the backwards logic of aim blocking lasers.

Originally posted by jinzin
Let's get something straight off the bat, Elektra dark reign is using an Elektra who's practically on her last leg, it's no indication of her typical speed which has her blocking automatic gunfire by the individual bullet which has nothing to do with "aim blocking" like you're talking about
Irrelevant. And wholly anticipated from you when I started scanning it. The purpose of this scan is to illustrate a common premise. It's one of the most recent explications of how street-levelers do what they do off the top of my head. It explains exactly why street-levelers are able to do what they are able to do. Unless you can prove that someone didn't anticipate and begin to move to evade or block until after the bullet/laser is fired, then you have absolutely no reason in hell to suggest that they only reacted AFTER the bullet or laser was fired:

The ability to react to a bullet only after it's fired requires movement speed far beyond street-level. For a laser? It requires superspeedster level since light travels a foot in a nanosecond. This common premise is initimably clear on KMC when people discuss bullet-dodging or laser-dodging feats among street-levelers, e.g. Batman, Nightwing, Dardevil, Cap, Elektra, Punisher, Blade, Wolvie, etc. And with all the comics you have obviously read, you are in a better position to understand this moreso than most. But you keep bringing up the same garbage argument. You're not stupid. So you must be trolling. The only reason you could possibly have is to use semantics to ignore this common premise and equivocate your position in this thread. ONLY if the bullet/laser is fired BEFORE he's in position to evade/defend is it indicative of such high levels of speed or reflexes. There is a VAST distinction between Cap dodging each bullet fired in the first scan (a common generic example amongst thousands) and Cap dodging the bullet in the second scan:

In the former scan, we can't know for sure whether Cap is simply telegraphing the pistol's shots and already moving at each moment before the gunman squeezes off a properly aimed shot with his pistol. Without seeing his position relative to each shot, it's impossible to tell. In the latter scan, we know for sure Cap hasn't moved when the bullet is fired because we see in the same exact panel, that the bullet is fired from point-blank range and Cap is not in a defensive or evasive position. He had to shift his body in the space fo the bullet leaving the muzzle and it reaching his body. Very few street-levelers have demonstrated this level of speed. Elektra arguably does, Batgirl definitely does. You haven't shown any for Wolverine. But you keep trying to pass off scans where we cannot tell whether Wolverine telegraphed bullets or lasers as if they were the same. Garbage. And you're smart enough to know it. Drop it or bring this issue to a battlezone.

Originally posted by jinzin
and once again, all I see is you scraping the bottom of the barrel here to lowball everything Wolverine's done while blowing Thor's feats out of proportion... Seriously.... to use his hammer while flying around to slam into the ground taking the majority of 1.2 secons is NO indication that he's faster than Wolverine in combat, nor is batting a building away with two swings.... Both of those are more strength related than speed....
Except you keep ignoring the speed required of such feats as illustrated. I've given you several oppurtunites to quantify and allot the 1.2 seconds amongst Thor diverting his direction to the ground, landing, calculating the trajectory and exact strength of the blow, swinging his hammer down, and the time needed for the shockwave to travel. You've also offered nothing but semantics and incorrect statements, i.e. the bricks are moving faster than Gladiator because you're unable to accept the level of speed required for such a feat. Even if you decided to take srankmissingnin's ridiculous take and argue they're only falling at the speed of gravity, go ahead and imagine a huge pile of bricks fell on top of you. If you had to take successive swings to knock the bricks away, how fast would you have to swing it back and forth? Even if you can't allow yourself to wrap your head around that, go ahead and lowball Gladiator and argue that he's only speed-blitzing at the speed of sound. That still requires Thor to have swung his hammer twice in the space of thousandths of a second.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
It not him fighting at suer speed and it not faster then a laser so it quite irelevent

He catched an attack and obviously reacted to it? How is it different to super speed? Do that to any attack and you can dodge it.

Originally posted by jinzin
Now, I'm not going to sit here endlessly debating these circles with you as I already did what I came here to do an matched you feat for feat regardless of your one sided bias nitpicking when you're not straight up ignoring what I posted.... At the end of the day they both have similar explosive speed feats reacting to lasers, having "nano and microsecond" feats (No matter that you apparently think Scott's beams are slower than arrows or that Wolverine has eyes in the back of his head for that matter),
NOBODY takes those feats seriously as if Wolverine had nanosecond speed or FTL reflexes. NOBODY. Bring this premise to a battlezone, otherwise stop embarassing yourself. You can't prove that those scans are indicative of nanosecond or FTL combat speed. Even if we assumed like retards that they do prove tFTL reflexes, than Thor, Punisher, Daredevil, Cap, they all have nanosecond or FTL combat speed! Get over the fact that those feats contribute absolutely nothing to this debate and only serve to embarass and expose how desperate you are to match Thor's best speed feats. But if you really want to argue this premise, bring it to a battlezone.
Originally posted by jinzin
both have tagged speedsters and reacted to speedsters in the same fashion, both have delt with every kind of projectile out there....... Now... for some reason you think Thor's feats are more impressive when they've done the same things for no other reasons than your endless nitpicking robbing any benefit of the doubt at all as was clear with the terrorist blitze..... and yet as you've already pointed out: the same criticisms that you've argued against Wolverine's feats can be used to argue against Thor's.
Wolverine's tagged speedsters. But not nearly as many as Thor has. Also, Wolverine's never tagged superspeedsters. Thor has him beat in the punking speedsters area. Another fact you fail to notice or can't bring yourself to admit.

The criticism of the terrorist blitz is clear. You argued that the terrorist saw his buddies unload into Wolverine and it didn't put him down. So he must have known one bullet wouldn't be enough and must have immediately tried to fire off another pistol shot. And because he was going to fire off another immediate shot, Wolverine had to close that distance between them at blitzing speed. GARBAGE. Because by your very own admission: the terrorist would have known that even an entire pistol clip wouldn't have been enough to put Wolverine down. So why bother with another shot? Of course, you fail to address this the LAST time I pointed it out. It's more arguable that the terrorist did it out of spite in response to Logan's pontificating. As far as the scan stands, there is no measurable reference to figure out how to time Wolverine's closing of the space between them. "ZOMG, look at teh speed linez!!!11" doesn't pass for a measurable reference.

Originally posted by jinzin
My point is simple, when both characters have the same feats of explosive speed and we're having a discussion about their h2h speed, then we need to look at their hand to hand performances which in Thor's case..... are not impressive a good majority of the time. The simple fact is that Wolverine regularly outperforms him in h2h speed and if the best counter argument anyone can come up with for that is "Well why SHOULD Thor use his speed in fights" then I'm at a loss to even begin to educate such willful ignorance.

The fact of the matter is that Thor's speed is not an impressive enough thing in about 99% of his fights to say he's legitimately faster than Wolverine in combat. Yes he has some speed feats, very few and far between in his career but they're hardly more impressive than typical street level fair no matter how much filler you want to impose on each feat, and when those feats are an outliner for a characters typical performancce by that kind of ratio anyway... we have a term for that around here..... I'm sure you know full well what that is.

They have the same feats of explosive speed up to a point. After that point, Thor surpasses him in speed feats. As proven, on-panel. Ignoring that fact to build an argument is willful ad ignorantium. The good majority of the time, Wolverine doesn't use his fighting skills and speed to dodge bullets. The good majority of the time, he just wades through them. Has anybody ever suggested that is evidence that we should assume Wovlerine wouldn't use his combat speed in a fight? Absolutely not. Why? First, because it's a stupid argument. Second, because we all recognize that he can simply rely on his healing factor and does so. Which makes sense, because sometimes, it's plain easier than dodging every single bullet that comes his way. He also has been stated on-panel to want to give himself an excuse for violence on his attackers. There are reasons he gets shot up a good majority of the time. We don't hold that against Wolverine's proven combat speed. That's a stupid and facile argument.

As for Thor? He can simply rely on Mjolnir rather than his speed for most situations. As for focusing on H2H fights, it's also been stated on-panel that Thor's warrior's pride emerges against top-tier bricks and he wants to go blow for blow to prove his strength. Something he wouldn't bother with when fighting someone far below his strength level. Ignoring these reasons is the true crime of willful ignorance you're accusing me of. Try thinking about the times when Thor goes H2H and is forced to use his speed, i.e. when a single touch by Hela would kill him, or when bereft of Mjolnir, he's fighting off both Loki and Fenris w/ Mjolnir copies. Try thinking about examples and scenarios from his past that would actually apply to such a fight, where Thor is fighting someone far below his threshold, has to deal with "zomg teh one-shot kill clawzorz," and is completely bereft of all his powers. After all, I did. Which is why half of my list's space was taken up by examples where he didn't even have Mjolnir. Don't be ignorant.

But of course, thinking out how such a fight would go based on Thor's proven capacity and the circumstances of this fight would be too mature. You'd rather ignore that Thor has superior combat speed/reflexes proven on-panel. You'd rather ignore that the circumstances of such a fight would dictate that Thor would fight differently as he has in the past in similar situations. Phail. Nuff said.

Yes, its well known that Kallark is a slug:

http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb6/Enteithegreat/Imperial%20Guard/Kallark-ReacttoBullet.jpg

: |

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Battlehammer: Support Wolvie. Don't support him using the backwards logic of aim blocking lasers.Irrelevant. And wholly anticipated from you when I started scanning it. The purpose of this scan is to illustrate a common premise. It's one of the most recent explications of how street-levelers do what they do off the top of my head. It explains exactly why street-levelers are able to do what they are able to do. Unless you can prove that someone didn't anticipate and begin to move to evade or block until after the bullet/laser is fired, then you have absolutely no reason in hell to suggest that they only reacted AFTER the bullet or laser was fired:

....oooorrrr we could debate in some more circles....

It's not irrelivent. You're using the premise on a character who doesn't always have to resort to that premise just to make your point.. a character LIKE WOLVERINE....
A guy who has done feats in which this "aim blocking" theory of yours would be outright impossible. Now... as I said before, I don't think ANYBODY should be blocking, dodging or otherwise evading things like laser fire, and gunfire because to be able to do that requires speedster levels of quickness that streeters simply should not possess, and while aim blocking is the best and most logical way to rationalize how these characters do what they do, it's still a reach when you have people doing things like dodging bullets after they've been fired etc, with their back turned to the gunman, surrounded by multiple gunmen, etc etc.

But what I think on the matter is equally irrelivent because Wolverine as I said has done feats where aim blocking is simply not feasable.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=3741659
http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/5402/kwls2pg18lowresnc4.jpg

http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/3725/speedbarvw6.jpg

http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8592/lazerxfire.jpg
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/9748/lazerxfire2.jpg

And then of course you have outright assessments from characters with radar stating that Wolverine's dodging bullets and lasers... Like with DD and's that's when it's not described by the narrative itself.
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/3595/scurred.jpg

Wolverine may resort to aim blocking sometimes, but he doesn't all the time and that's the standard you're attempting to keep him at.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
The ability to react to a bullet only after it's fired requires movement speed far beyond street-level. For a laser? It requires superspeedster level since light travels a foot in a nanosecond.
It's like you think you're telling me something I don't already know.. The only difference is that I don't think my criticisms of the feats take more precedence than the feats themselves.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
This common premise is initimably clear on KMC when people discuss bullet-dodging or laser-dodging feats among street-levelers, e.g. Batman, Nightwing, Dardevil, Cap, Elektra, Punisher, Blade, Wolvie, etc. And with all the comics you have obviously read, you are in a better position to understand this moreso than most. But you keep bringing up the same garbage argument. You're not stupid. So you must be trolling. The only reason you could possibly have is to use semantics to ignore this common premise and equivocate your position in this thread. ONLY if the bullet/laser is fired BEFORE he's in position to evade/defend is it indicative of such high levels of speed or reflexes.
I disagree. I should think moving AS it's fired would also indicate the spectrum of speed we're discussing. Especially when you're talking about god damned laser fire.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
There is a VAST distinction between Cap dodging each bullet fired in the first scan (a common generic example amongst thousands) and Cap dodging the bullet in the second scan:


Agreed. Again, you're not bringing any news to the table here. HOWEVER, both are still in the same range of speed which is why the second scan is not THAT much more impressive than the first.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
In the former scan, we can't know for sure whether Cap is simply telegraphing the pistol's shots and already moving at each moment before the gunman squeezes off a properly aimed shot with his pistol. Without seeing his position relative to each shot, it's impossible to tell. In the latter scan, we know for sure Cap hasn't moved when the bullet is fired because we see in the same exact panel, that the bullet is fired from point-blank range and Cap is not in a defensive or evasive position. He had to shift his body in the space fo the bullet leaving the muzzle and it reaching his body. Very few street-levelers have demonstrated this level of speed. Elektra arguably does, Batgirl definitely does. You haven't shown any for Wolverine. But you keep trying to pass off scans where we cannot tell whether Wolverine telegraphed bullets or lasers as if they were the same. Garbage.

The only garbage I can see here is where you're trying to pass off that Wolverine is at some lower level of speed than Cap and Elektra when they're side to side comparisons would indicate otherwise.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
And you're smart enough to know it. Drop it or bring this issue to a battlezone.Except you keep ignoring the speed required of such feats as illustrated. I've given you several oppurtunites to quantify and allot the 1.2 seconds amongst Thor diverting his direction to the ground, landing, calculating the trajectory and exact strength of the blow, swinging his hammer down, and the time needed for the shockwave to travel.
Again, Thor flew down and hit his hammer on the ground. The speed is far more attributed to the speed Mjolnir could carry him and the speed of the shockwave itself than it is for Thor's combat speed no matter how much filler you would like to add to the action itself.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
You've also offered nothing but semantics and incorrect statements, i.e. the bricks are moving faster than Gladiator because you're unable to accept the level of speed required for such a feat.
no, the bricks are moving faster than Gladiator because they ARE moving faster than Gladiator.
🤨

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Even if you decided to take srankmissingnin's ridiculous take and argue they're only falling at the speed of gravity,
Which I don't think they were.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
go ahead and imagine a huge pile of bricks fell on top of you. If you had to take successive swings to knock the bricks away, how fast would you have to swing it back and forth?
😐

regular humans have been capible of throwing up to 10 punches in a second... I seriously think you're giving the bricks too much credit here.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Even if you can't allow yourself to wrap your head around that, go ahead and lowball Gladiator and argue that he's only speed-blitzing at the speed of sound. That still requires Thor to have swung his hammer twice in the space of thousandths of a second.
I'm not lowballing Gladiator, I'm simply stating that he didn't blitze Thor as fast as he could have or even relatively fast at all... He WAS coming up behind the bricks and Thor let lose with two hits that made sound and THEN Glad's hit him... because we don't know what Gladiator's speed WAS then we have to look at what we do have.... and Thor hitting a building away with two swings, NO WAY IN HELL is more impressive than Wolverine dismantling Geist's entire skintight suit of armor down to mere coils faster than Giest could move.

Originally posted by jinzin

I'm not lowballing Gladiator, I'm simply stating that he didn't blitze Thor as fast as he could have or even relatively fast at all...

Awww man you kill me, just golden. Keep em coming. 😆

Theres always some good shit Thor using his hammer to help with his speed and theres always more.

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Awww man you kill me, just golden. Keep em coming. 😆

Theres always some good shit Thor using his hammer to help with his speed and theres always more.

yeah because he's never done that before..... 😕

Y'know what? you're right Zone, Gladiator was blitzing Thor at 100 times the speed of light there wasn't he? I mean it's obvious, those are just magic bricks or something.

Originally posted by jinzin
yeah because he's never done that before..... 😕

What on earth are you talking about he didnt use the hammer to catch Hermes.

Originally posted by jinzin

Y'know what? you're right Zone, Gladiator was blitzing Thor at 100 times the speed of light there wasn't he? I mean it's obvious, those are just magic bricks or something.

I dont know about this 100 times speed of light thing or the bricks. What I do know is that he was probably going very fast and....probably faster than Speed Demon. 😂

Originally posted by jinzin
....oooorrrr we could debate in some more circles....

It's not irrelivent. You're using the premise on a character who doesn't always have to resort to that premise just to make your point.. a character LIKE WOLVERINE....
A guy who has done feats in which this "aim blocking" theory of yours would be outright impossible. Now... as I said before, I don't think ANYBODY should be blocking, dodging or otherwise evading things like laser fire, and gunfire because to be able to do that requires speedster levels of quickness that streeters simply should not possess, and while aim blocking is the best and most logical way to rationalize how these characters do what they do, it's still a reach when you have people doing things like dodging bullets after they've been fired etc, with their back turned to the gunman, surrounded by multiple gunmen, etc etc.

But what I think on the matter is equally irrelivent because Wolverine as I said has done feats where aim blocking is simply not feasable.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=3741659
http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/5402/kwls2pg18lowresnc4.jpg

http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/3725/speedbarvw6.jpg

http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8592/lazerxfire.jpg
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/9748/lazerxfire2.jpg

And then of course you have outright assessments from characters with radar stating that Wolverine's dodging bullets and lasers... Like with DD and's that's when it's not described by the narrative itself.
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/3595/scurred.jpg

Wolverine may resort to aim blocking sometimes, but he doesn't all the time and that's the standard you're attempting to keep him at.

It's like you think you're telling me something I don't already know.. The only difference is that I don't think my criticisms of the feats take more precedence than the feats themselves.

I disagree. I should think moving AS it's fired would also indicate the spectrum of speed we're discussing. Especially when you're talking about god damned laser fire.

Agreed. Again, you're not bringing any news to the table here. HOWEVER, both are still in the same range of speed which is why the second scan is not THAT much more impressive than the first.

The only garbage I can see here is where you're trying to pass off that Wolverine is at some lower level of speed than Cap and Elektra when they're side to side comparisons would indicate otherwise.

Again, Thor flew down and hit his hammer on the ground. The speed is far more attributed to the speed Mjolnir could carry him and the speed of the shockwave itself than it is for Thor's combat speed no matter how much filler you would like to add to the action itself.

no, the bricks are moving faster than Gladiator because they ARE moving faster than Gladiator.
🤨

Which I don't think they were.

😐

regular humans have been capible of throwing up to 10 punches in a second... I seriously think you're giving the bricks too much credit here.

I'm not lowballing Gladiator, I'm simply stating that he didn't blitze Thor as fast as he could have or even relatively fast at all... He WAS coming up behind the bricks and Thor let lose with two hits that made sound and THEN Glad's hit him... because we don't know what Gladiator's speed WAS then we have to look at what we do have.... and Thor hitting a building away with two swings, NO WAY IN HELL is more impressive than Wolverine dismantling Geist's entire skintight suit of armor down to mere coils faster than Giest could move.

I agree

Of course you do.

Originally posted by Mindset
Of course you do.

Mindset, show me hercules best speed that make you think he could keep up with wolverine without getting stabbed to death first?

Why?

Btw, how do you stab someone who is immortal to death.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
NOBODY takes those feats seriously as if Wolverine had nanosecond speed or FTL reflexes. NOBODY.

😂 Was it not you who said I exhibited a logical fallacy by presuming Thor couldn't do an instantaneous feat because he's not that fast? Once again, hypocritical self serving bullshit on your part.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Bring this premise to a battlezone, otherwise stop embarassing yourself. You can't prove that those scans are indicative of nanosecond or FTL combat speed.

The EXACT SAME WAY YOU CAN'T do that for the Gladiator feat, the Mjolnir catching feat or the ground hitting feat? Yeah thought so. The fact is that the only way you would think that it WASN'T a feat indicating as much is if you thought Cyclops' blasts operated at levels a multitude of times slower than they've been shown and stated.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Even if we assumed like retards that they do prove tFTL reflexes, than Thor, Punisher, Daredevil, Cap, they all have nanosecond or FTL combat speed!
They all have the same types of ridiculous feats, yes....
Which is why these feats are only ever brought up to debunk the notion that so-and-so are faster than they are in the first place.... None of these characters have any business pulling them off in the first place.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Get over the fact that those feats contribute absolutely nothing to this debate and only serve to embarass and expose how desperate you are to match Thor's best speed feats.
😂

Again, calling the kettle black on this one.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
But if you really want to argue this premise, bring it to a battlezone.Wolverine's tagged speedsters. But not nearly as many as Thor has. Also, Wolverine's never tagged superspeedsters. Thor has him beat in the punking speedsters area. Another fact you fail to notice or can't bring yourself to admit.

Where? When he grabbed Hermes using Mjolnir? Or the OTHER time he grabbed Hermes using Mjolnir?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
The criticism of the terrorist blitz is clear.

Yes... QUITE clear.. that if you think this is indicative of anything OTHER than a blitz

http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/8499/xmenv2133p03gm1.jpg
http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/6867/bulletsidestepkq1.jpg

Then you've CLEARLY lost it.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
You argued that the terrorist saw his buddies unload into Wolverine and it didn't put him down. So he must have known one bullet wouldn't be enough and must have immediately tried to fire off another pistol shot. And because he was going to fire off another immediate shot, Wolverine had to close that distance between them at blitzing speed. GARBAGE.
It IS garbage because it isn't what I argued at all.....
Again... for someone who wants to sling the term strawman around every other reply you make, you sure do one hell of a job makin em.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Because by your very own admission: the terrorist would have known that even an entire pistol clip wouldn't have been enough to put Wolverine down. So why bother with another shot? Of course, you fail to address this the LAST time I pointed it out. It's more arguable that the terrorist did it out of spite in response to Logan's pontificating. As far as the scan stands, there is no measurable reference to figure out how to time Wolverine's closing of the space between them. "ZOMG, look at teh speed linez!!!11" doesn't pass for a measurable reference.

Why bother with the first shot? He either thought he'd get lucky or was at a loss as to what else to do. He put the pistol down and then picked it up again while Logan's back was turned to fire. That's not spite, that's cowardice followed by deperation.

Again... as if Logan evading the bullet in bullet time wasn't enough.
Or being 20-40 feet away.
Or the fact that the terrorist didn't fire another round, or try to run, away, reason, or plead in response,
Or the fact that Wolverine's nothing but a colorless blur immediately after the bullet grazes his cheek you're still convinced this isn't a speed feat. As usual ignoring what you don't like or can't explain. Nice goin. thumbsup
It's sad that the writers and artists try to give readers like you enough credit to figure it out on your own, but you know better I guess.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
They have the same feats of explosive speed up to a point. After that point, Thor surpasses him in speed feats. As proven, on-panel.

As YET to be proven on panel actually, which is why you're still here. Every comparison of explosive speed is similiar to one another and there has yet to be something that puts Thor above what most street levels have done.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Ignoring that fact
It's not a fact... Most of your speed feats are ambiguous as anyone elses... You just make more up for them while pretending like your criticisms for other people's speed feats don't apply to Thor.

I remember that when Herc was fighting Ares he used his as a baseball bat to intercept missiles. I'm pretty sure you need to be faster than a missile to do that.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
The good majority of the time, Wolverine doesn't use his fighting skills and speed to dodge bullets. The good majority of the time, he just wades through them.
WHICH IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT THAN THOR FIGHTING PEOPLE.
Wolverine usually wades through bullets because he knows he can take it and usually does. But how many times has he tried to avoid being shot and been unable to do so. It's not many.

Alternatively there ARE many hard fought battles Thor has where he IS overwhelmed by faster or stronger characters in spite of not wanting to be and this mythical speed you think he has is nowhere to be found. The whole argument that Thor just doesn't use it because he doesn't want to is completely an argument of convenience because unlike Wolverine with bullets, Thor a lot of the times can't afford to just stand there and take it.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Has anybody ever suggested that is evidence that we should assume Wovlerine wouldn't use his combat speed in a fight? Absolutely not.
Actually yes... Many... MANY times... Your Wolverine hatin ass should be well aware of that by now.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Why? First, because it's a stupid argument. Second, because we all recognize that he can simply rely on his healing factor and does so. Which makes sense, because sometimes, it's plain easier than dodging every single bullet that comes his way. He also has been stated on-panel to want to give himself an excuse for violence on his attackers.
Exactly... so where's the on panel statement that Thor chooses NOT to use his speed to give his opponents a chance against him?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
There are reasons he gets shot up a good majority of the time. We don't hold that against Wolverine's proven combat speed. That's a stupid and facile argument.
Because his combat speed has been proven IN COMBAT.... yknow... like Thor's slower combat speed.. which you keep trying to ignore.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
As for Thor? He can simply rely on Mjolnir rather than his speed for most situations. As for focusing on H2H fights, it's also been stated on-panel that Thor's warrior's pride emerges against top-tier bricks and he wants to go blow for blow to prove his strength.
Which may very well be the case, but once again, when he gets backed into a corner, when his strength alone is not enough.. where the hell does his speed go? Where is it stated he witholds it to fight opponents.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Something he wouldn't bother with when fighting someone far below his strength level. Ignoring these reasons is the true crime of willful ignorance you're accusing me of. Try thinking about the times when Thor goes H2H and is forced to use his speed, i.e. when a single touch by Hela would kill him,
Avoiding two blows from Hela who isn't particularly fast, or skilled in h2h is not enough of a reason to think he's a speedster.
And....
😕

Exactly....
Thor dodges when the sake of the story needs him to do so.... and when it's that plot driven and that sparce throughout his career.. we have a term for that on KMC and you know full well what that is.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
or when bereft of Mjolnir, he's fighting off both Loki and Fenris w/ Mjolnir copies.
Cap had to block Thor in that fight from BOTH Fenris AND Loki's attaks because Thor wasn't "fast enough" to avoid them his damn self....
As far a trouncing them upclose in h2h..... They're not super skilled super fast warriors so I once again fail to see how this is impressive.. Both were getting embarrassed by Cap in the same time span....

Wolverine on the other hand does this with characters like Azrael and his soul clone who DO have superior skill in h2h. It's a much more impressive feat.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Try thinking about examples and scenarios from his past that would actually apply to such a fight, where Thor is fighting someone far below his threshold, has to deal with "zomg teh one-shot kill clawzorz," and is completely bereft of all his powers. After all, I did. Which is why half of my list's space was taken up by examples where he didn't even have Mjolnir. Don't be ignorant.
me not being ignorant is the reason why I'm not deluded into thinking Thor's speed is >>> Streets on Logan's level. 🙂

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
But of course, thinking out how such a fight would go based on Thor's proven capacity and the circumstances of this fight would be too mature. You'd rather ignore that Thor has superior combat speed/reflexes proven on-panel. You'd rather ignore that the circumstances of such a fight would dictate that Thor would fight differently as he has in the past in similar situations. Phail. Nuff said.
No I'd rather measure Thor up to how he TYPICALLY performs in H2H combat... which has him being danced around by guys like Cap, Spidey, Mongoose, Daredevil. And slugging it out with Hulk, Juggs, Thing, the Bloodbrothers, Bloodaxe etc... NOT A SPEEDSTER like you seem to think he is.....

Equally I don't think Wolverine is going to perform outside his typical level which means that it's not going to be an easy fight either way it goes...

Originally posted by Mindset
Why?

Btw, how do you stab someone who is immortal to death.

Didnt mean it like that but he can be tkoed.

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
What on earth are you talking about he didnt use the hammer to catch Hermes.

🤨

He used it to navigate towards hermes while holding out his hand.. what's hard about that? it's not like Thor was in a statis position while Hermes tried to run past him and Thor turned around and snagged him.

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
I dont know about this 100 times speed of light thing or the bricks. What I do know is that he was probably going very fast and....probably faster than Speed Demon. 😂
he wasn't going faster than the brick wall in front of him and since there's no indication of how fast he WAS going you really aren't qualified to make that statement are you?

mariofacepalm

Fail Thread.

lol pretty much...

is that a naruto character?

Originally posted by jinzin
🤨

He used it to navigate towards hermes while holding out his hand.. what's hard about that? it's not like Thor was in a statis position while Hermes tried to run past him and Thor turned around and snagged him.

You know even if he didnt have the hammer he would have still snagged him. Dont think hermes was trying to run past him.

Originally posted by jinzin

he wasn't going faster than the brick wall in front of him

Um didnt he chuck the brick wall first....he wasnt in a race with it, it had already reached its destination.

Originally posted by jinzin

and since there's no indication of how fast he WAS going you really aren't qualified to make that statement are you?

Of course there is you're just pretending he was slow. Gladiator was trying to kicks thor's arse = I better haul arse and go very fast or Thors going to give me a beating.