Ganon, Kratos, and Link vs Sephiroth, Dante, and Megaman.

Started by Burning thought11 pages

Your argument is started against me, the fact someone else called you out on saying something ridiculous to troll me is something I dont think you did take into consideration when you planned on trolling me.

Saying Mario lifting up castles is a realistic depiction and not a toon force depiction is a ridiculous thing to say.

It is a realistic depiction in the sense that we're talking about Mario. Unlike LoZ, this Mario is always the same Mario. Lifting the castle is consistent with the rest of the series.

Yes and most of the series is toon force.....

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
It is a realistic depiction in the sense that we're talking about Mario. Unlike LoZ, this Mario is always the same Mario. Lifting the castle is consistent with the rest of the series.

Consistant like putting effort into pulling up a chestnut or struggle to throw a lizard a few times his size ten feet.

Originally posted by Rapidash
Consistant like putting effort into pulling up a chestnut or struggle to throw a lizard a few times his size ten feet.

Bowser is also always the same Bowser. His varying size is negligible. Mario can always throw him.

Besides, in Galaxy he sends him spiraling out of control around a small planet with a single spin.

It violates your consistancy talk.

Only in relation to Bowser's size. I use the Bowser size from the most recent main stream Mario game.

How do you explain the chestnut then and on what are you basing Bowser's the weight equivalent of a castle?

I'm not sure what Chesnut you're talking about. I don't think I've ever seen that.

I'm basing it on his size and that he is well muscled.

I can't remember the name of the game where you pull Chestnuts out of the ground and throw them at your foes. You stand on top of them, hold down, activate the grab button and you rip them out of the ground with some effort.

How does his size and muscular body compare to a castle? There is no consistancy. it takes effort for Mario to throw Bowser ten feet and that's after he has gotten a chance to build up velocity by spinning around. Then a bomb is adequate to send Bowser flying again, implicating not the weight of a castle.

Super Mario Brothers 2

Super Mario Bros 2 took place in a dream world. And the things are huge, like the size of Mario.

If I remember correctly, the Castle that Mario lifted was relatively small. Fact is Mario is still strong, the Castle feat being his best doesn't mean its inconsistent.

Consistancy. The ability to throw a turtle shell two feet. The ability to throw Bowser barely ten feet. The ability to throw a castle out of sight. Being slowed down when carrying particular objects and jumps lower.

Where is the accordance? He's strong. There's no denying it, but it's not consistant strength.

I'm just gonna say this as a side-note.

Mario is not in this damn thread. 😐

I kinda let it slide for awhile, but whether it's a feat that people will argue over for days, and pages. I personally conside it canon, and a damn good feat. Also, as the OP I'm making an adjustment to this scenario.

Mario is not actually in this fight, but for this thread Toon-Force is allowed, just so that whether you consider it toon force or not, it's in.

I did not even read the title of the thread. Embarassing. I'll drop the Mario talk 🙂

Lol, it happens, thanks. 😛

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
until I see evidence otherwise, I'm inclined ot believe he can, sorry to say.

The forces he'd have to be capable of withstanding in such a fight are IMMENSE, let me go find one of my old posts to quote for an example of such forces.

Edit:

This is from the sims vs TP Link thread. But it applies to Link from OoT just as well.

Link's fingers can handle 8494 tons of PSI totally unscathed. His neck > his fingers, I'm guessing.

Further editing: It's only common sense for a character's strength to match up reasonably well with their strength, anyway. Any character in fiction follows this rule. The Hulk, Supes, Spiderman, their strength and durability all sit at similar levels relative to their strength. [Otherwise they'd kill themselves by accident.]

The burden of proof does not fall on me to know if link cant tank a shot by a 100++ tonner stabbing him in the neck/decapitating him. So far you have not shown me any actual proof that link can tank that much force from the tip of a sword on his neck and be ok. If you think this, then there really is no point in arguing because your to stubborn to understand something that was supposed to be common sense in the first place... Bt pretty much got the rest of your post.

"Consistancy. The ability to throw a turtle shell two feet. The ability to throw Bowser barely ten feet. The ability to throw a castle out of sight. Being slowed down when carrying particular objects and jumps lower.

Where is the accordance? He's strong. There's no denying it, but it's not consistant strength."

Makes perfect sense. mario's feat is inconsistent can cant be taken seriously. And just because mario has the same strength in all of the games does not mean that it isnt toon force.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I'm just gonna say this as a side-note.

Mario is not in this damn thread. 😐

I kinda let it slide for awhile, but whether it's a feat that people will argue over for days, and pages. I personally conside it canon, and a damn good feat. Also, as the OP I'm making an adjustment to this scenario.

Mario is not actually in this fight, but for this thread Toon-Force is allowed, just so that whether you consider it toon force or not, it's in.

I gave you the proof, if you disagree, refute?

No... you havent.