Victory-Class Star Destroyer vs. Modern Day Earth

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Unintentional spite is spite that you didn't mean to occur. Intentional spite is done on purpose. Your Empire vs. Earth thread was spiteful, but your intention is what really matters. As soon as you said that you thought from the beginning that Earth would win, we realized your intentional spite. That's where all the hostility originated.

Bingo.

It was NOT an intentional spite, because otherwise why did you argue for the Empire for the first several pages?

But that's the question: can Earth harm the star destroyers?

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
It was NOT an intentional spite, because otherwise why did you argue for the Empire for the first several pages?

But that's the question: can Earth harm the star destroyers?

And no. We have nothing that get in range of the turbo and quad lasers, and nothing that can will egt through the shields.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
My intention doesn't matter. Your thread, your intention.

And no. We have nothing that get in range of the turbo and quad lasers, and nothing that can will egt through the shields.

And my intention was NOT for it to be a spite.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
And my intention was NOT for it to be a spite.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Then your mistake was to give your opinion that the Earth would win handily. Even if it meant lieing, saying you thought it was balanced sounds a lot better.

You claimed that the Empire would win handily. And I admitted that the Empire would put up a good fight.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
You claimed that the Empire would win handily. And I admitted that the Empire would put up a good fight.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Image is everything. I could freely state whether I thought a side would win or not because I wasn't the creator.

So you're saying that you can say "bad" things but I can't? And if this is a spite against Empire, then why did you say that Empire wins handily in the first few pages?

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
So you're saying that you can say "bad" things but I can't? And if this is a spite against Empire, then why did you say that Empire wins handily in the first few pages?

But that's irrelevant really. The ultimate issue is, why did you make such a fuss about making a mistake?

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
No, you're twisting my words. The thread's creator shouldn't be able to set the parameters and then almost immediately decide who would win (because what's the point really)? I argued for the Empire because I like the civilization vs. threads, so I argue them. And generally, the Imps are more powerful than we are, so my choice made sense. After debate, I came to realize they would actually lose, and quite severely at that. Maturity is found in those who can concede defeat when they've lost.

But that's irrelevant really. The ultimate issue is, why did you make such a fuss about making a mistake?

dude epic post

QFT lol

and it didn't contain any swear words in any language, or call anyone fanboy...
and was politely replying also.

role model poster 😄 lol

Thank you. I'm usually calm, albeit sarcastic.

np.
lol

any of you here good at chem?

if so, do electrons flow from the anode to the cathode in an electrolytic cell? or cathode to anode? and in a voltaic cell, how does a salt bridge work?

u don't have to answer. this is pretty off topic.

and uh is this thread done? I don't really have arguements for the imps.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
So you're saying that you can say "bad" things but I can't? And if this is a spite against Empire, then why did you say that Empire wins handily in the first few pages?

you take things to personally. are you going to die if your e-honor is tarnished?

Originally posted by WO Polaski
you take things to personally. are you going to die if your e-honor is tarnished?

He may.

lol

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
No, you're twisting my words. The thread's creator shouldn't be able to set the parameters and then almost immediately decide who would win (because what's the point really)? I argued for the Empire because I like the civilization vs. threads, so I argue them. And generally, the Imps are more powerful than we are, so my choice made sense. After debate, I came to realize they would actually lose, and quite severely at that. Maturity is found in those who can concede defeat when they've lost.

But that's irrelevant really. The ultimate issue is, why did you make such a fuss about making a mistake?

So wait...you said that I should have noticed right away that it was a spite, yet you didn't until later. You argued for the Empire, and then realized that you were wrong and that my side (Earth) wins. Therefore, does that not mean that I won because you realized that Earth wins and not the Empire? Sure now you claim that it's a spite, but you didn't notice it at first and argued for one side and LOST because your side didn't win. So "after debate I (you) came to realize that they would actually lose"...this is proof that I won.

And I DID ADMIT in my PM that this thread was a little bit unbalanced (but not really a "spite"😉, but it's really immature of you to argue for a side, realize that you're wrong and instead of admitting it just go and blame the other side for making a spite thread.

In other words:

You argued for Empire
I argued for Earth

You say Empire wins
I say Earth wins

We argue

Eventually, you get defeated and realize that Earth wins...easily

You then go on to blame me about making a spite thread...well a spite thread is a thread that one can EASILY recognize as one sided, and you didn't even notice it for several pages.

Conclusion:

I won arguement. OK then, maybe it WAS a bit unbalanced, but you didn't notice that either.

PS. how come you keep on changing your story? At first you said that the thread was balanced at first but my modifications twisted it, and now you said that it's a spite from the start...

if so, do electrons flow from the anode to the cathode in an electrolytic cell? or cathode to anode? and in a voltaic cell, how does a salt bridge work?

The anode is positive and cathode negative, so the elctrons flow from the anode to the cathode.

I cant remember how the salt bridge worked, i studied it an year or 2 ago and don't remember the details, but i can look in my books if it's really important(if i can still find them) .

Hewh, Lucien, Gideon and the rest, why can't you call it a draw and just forget it. You guys aren't debating anything now just arguing on some stupid matters.

This "you can't edit after 15 min " sucks.

The salt bridge completes the circuite of the cell. It permits the electrons to pass from the Cu Sulfate solution to the Zn sulfate one . It's usually a U-shaped tube of some salt. You have to use a salt bridge to not let the 2 solutions to mix or else there will only be a chemical reaction with no traveling electrons that create electricity. I presume you know how the cell works and only wanted to know whats with the salt bridge right ?

In the galvanic cell the anode is the Zn electrone and cathode the Cu one.

yeah I knew how the cell works, just needed to refresh my memory of what the salt bridge does.

thx for looking it up for me.. 😄

np 😉

LOL when is your exam; like in a few hours?