Rorschach and John McClane switch places

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
There is more evidence through the damage done, that there would have been pain, rather than not.

That's saying that all massive damage means automatic pain, which it doesn't. The look of the bruises don't mean anything if they didn't effect him.

Your sig and avvy are cool btw.

Thank you.

Thats because it was a film. And he looked slow to focus after the beating, anyway.

Also its classic strawman, isnt it? (as Rorshach couldnt beat him either.)

Originally posted by Mr. Rhythmic
Oh please. The "Die Hard" movies are an average Tuesday for Rorschach.

Can't see how he's that much worse than McClane. Because he was real smooth firing that MP5. It doesn't take great skill to use a firearm.

Well first you have to know how to operate the damn thing. How to reload. Where the safety is. How to lead your target. Regular dude with no training picks up an MP5 and he gets a LOL.

It isn't that hard. I've never fired an MP5 but I know how to hold, load, aim, and fire it. It has a switch that is safety, semi, or automatic. Clip usually has 25 .9mm rounds. The gun itself is VERY heavy for it's size. You may think it's lightweight but it surely isn't.

I'm sure Rorschach knows how to use a gun. Batman doesn't employ them on the streets but he still knows how to operate them. He had to pass FBI exams and even has firearms in The Dark Knight.

Hell, Batman and Rorschach use guns. They just aren't firearms. Rorschach has his grapple gun and Batman utilizes the sticky bomb gun and grapple guns as well.

So you honestly think Rorschach can pick up an MP5 and use it as well as Mac?

Maybe not as well but you make it sound like he doesn't know how to hold a gun.

I never said that, all I meant to imply is that compared to Mac, he has no skills there. We never see him using a sub machine gun, so there is nothing to judge him on.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
So you honestly think Rorschach can pick up an MP5 and use it as well as Mac?

Yes.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Thats because it was a film.

That is a terrible argument.

And he looked slow to focus after the beating, anyway.

No he didn't. There was merely nothing left for him to do immediately. His job was done, and he was satisfied.

Also its classic strawman, isnt it? (as Rorshach couldnt beat him either.)

Straw can't be injured through pain.
And if Rorschach can't beat Veidt, then McClane is screwed.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
How so? Rorschach would care nothing for the hostages, and for all we know, he is shit with guns.

And yet we know his aim is incredible. And as for the hostages, he would to a level do his best to save them. But if you are right, then the situation's even easier for him.

We know his aim is incredible how?

Mac wins, but probably eats less baked beans than Rorschach.

RJ, I think you broke Sadako. 🙁

lol
He'd wish..