Originally posted by Placidity
Yes it does. Please do enlighten me if you think otherwise. I am very eager to listen to your expert knowledge on muscles and strength.
I already did quite soundly destroy your argument in the same post you quoted:
"By your logic, body builders should be the strongest people on Earth, and they aren't. Sure, they are strong."
Clearly, there is something else at play that determines strength than just cross-sectional area, at least for humans.
Originally posted by Placidity
Uh huh. Just mentioning two terms doesn't do anything for you.
I take this to mean you have no idea what I'm talking about so you just pretend the other guy is "talking out of his ass". Sorry, that is not how it works. If you don't know what I'm talking about, don't even attempt to rebutte: just let the argument go.
Originally posted by Placidity
Hypertrophy would be increase in muscle fibre size, which is what I was saying.
Which did occur on Spider-man However, the increase in size was very negligible. Obviously, the increase in size did not account for the increase from a 50-100 kilogram lifter to a 10-tonne (yes, tonne) lifter. His muscle-physiology changed so completely that something else was at play to give him his strength.
Originally posted by Placidity
Hyperplasia is completely irrelevant to what I was saying.
Actually, it is not. Hyperplasia is what can occur when power-lifting training is undertaken. This is part of what I referenced with Dr. Jose Antionio's work in the 90s. What he did with his group was considered controversial. In the medical-muscles world, his work was like discovering AIDS is caused by peaches: it was that groundbreaking. It clearly indicates that "bigger muscles" do not equal "more strength", contrary to he cross-sectional area muscle fiber belief. That is important. Why? Because it leaves room for silly fictional characters like Spider-man being super strong via methods other than absurd hypertrophy (Rhino, Juggernaut, etc...though they are not nearly as big as they should be for their strength requirements). Sure, Spider-man got stronger through means other than hyperplasia, but I only disagreed with the fundamental error of saying hypertrohphy makes one stronger: tens of thousands of bodybuilders that get out-lifted by skinny, 75 kg dudes can't be wrong.
Some of these elements are:
Number of fibers recruited during concentric movements.
Cross-sectional area of the muscle fibers.
Number of fibers per unit area (an indirect reference to hyperplasic results such as power lifters).
And a couple of other things that are too complicated to get into.
Sorry to be too harsh but I did not see your reply in 2009 as I was sure it was dropped. I thought my reference was enough to get you to google search Dr. Antonio's work and forget about the subject.
And, OI! Wasn't this the thread that Robtard convinced me to change my position because Spider-man is too durable?