Originally posted by Placidity
You'd be just fine? You have durability better than Green Goblin whom he beat into submission?You'd be dead.
Originally posted by Utrigita
Yeah Spiderman punches are so weak... A spiderman that have just learned his powers etc. made a grown man fly through the air without any difficulty...Placidity is right, Spiderman punches are weaksauce...
Originally posted by omgchos
Goblin was wreckin spidey initially.
Irrelevant.
Originally posted by omgchos
And sure he did end up beating him by dropping a brick wall on his ass.
No, Goblin was beaten into submission.
If you want to talk about a "brick wall", then Goblin wasn't "wrecking" him initially since you know, he got heaps of free shots in on the bridge, Spidey got towed and smashed all over the place before their fist fight started, and then there's the grenade to the face.
So how come his other enemies like Sandman, Venom, Green Goblin and New Goblin don't just tank his punches like they were nothing and laugh at him? Because apparently Peter's punches are weaker than an average man's.
Originally posted by omgchos
But the point here is that nothing about doc oc shouldve prevented what apperently should have been something along the lines of Gallagher and a watermelon. Yet he didnt even draw blood.
Again, exemplary instance of PIS.
You also ignored Utriga's point.
Peter also punched through Sandman, who has enough durability (his fists) to punch Spidey through metal, so let's not start with the "sand isn't durable" argument - If this were the case, his fist would've shattered instead of staying intact.
These people.
What makes the most sense:
A) Spider-Man can stop trains, hold multi-ton objects and has incredible speed, but his punches are weaker than a child's.
B) Doc Ock somehow became immensely durable throughout his whole body.
C) Spider-Man holds back as to not kill human-level opponents because he's a hero and adheres to Uncle Ben's commandment.
D) That fight was PIS and doesn't follow or support.
IMO, it's C with a helping of D
Originally posted by Robtard
These people.What makes the most sense:
A) Spider-Man can stop trains, hold multi-ton objects and has incredible speed, but his punches are weaker than a child's.
B) Doc Ock somehow became immensely durable throughout his whole body.
C) Spider-Man holds back as to not kill human-level opponents because he's a hero and adheres to Uncle Ben's commandment.
D) That fight was PIS and doesn't follow or support.
IMO, it's C with a helping of D
E) They want Ozy to win and will thus ignore all of Spider-man's average to high end feats.
Originally posted by Placidity
Irrelevant.No, Goblin was beaten into submission.
If you want to talk about a "brick wall", then Goblin wasn't "wrecking" him initially since you know, he got heaps of free shots in on the bridge, Spidey got towed and smashed all over the place before their fist fight started, and then there's the grenade to the face.
So how come his other enemies like Sandman, Venom, Green Goblin and New Goblin don't just tank his punches like they were nothing and laugh at him? Because apparently Peter's punches are weaker than an average man's.
Again, exemplary instance of PIS.
You also ignored Utriga's point.
Peter also punched through Sandman, who has enough durability (his fists) to punch Spidey through metal, so let's not start with the "sand isn't durable" argument - If this were the case, his fist would've shattered instead of staying intact.
I was relevant to the next sentence. Pointing out spideys weaksaucness. No need to nit pick my posts. Lets keep this civil.
Actually it was the brick wall. He dropped it on him then grabbed him to yank him over to the window where he punched him 3 times(and at this point he is quite pissed off), until goblin pulled the whole "wait, its me, wilhem dafoe" move. He did this in an attempt to fight dirty instead of fighting a pissed off foe. He is a villain after all. He was still perfectly fine after spidey was trying his best hurt him.
Thats what everyone says, whenever theres an absence of feats. Without him punching through something shown to be durable its completely relevant.
I dont see how i ignored his point. I addressed sarcasm, which im pretty sure was the point, lol.
If you refer to my origional post there youll see that i only saw Spiderman 3 once. It was a crapfest. I asked whether there were better punching feats in the movie or not, as i didnt remember specifics like that. I remember all the halariously stupid plotholes and such. Like the sand mutation test and that wodsworth or whatever for some reason never told harry that dafoe killed himself. I dont know why you didnt bring up sandman earlier. Wouldnt it make more sense tho that he could harden himself at will and his punches would obviously be harder than the rest of him if he wanted them to. I mean he is made of sand. I can punch through a sand castle no problem.
Originally posted by omgchos
I cant tell if you meant to type my name there or if you agree with me lol.
But no i saw the sarcsm.
I don't, which should be obvious, the example taken into light.
Good adress the example then, how do you explain that Peter Parker with a single punch can make Flash fly through the air, yet iyo are to weak to hurt Doc Orc?
Originally posted by Robtard
These people.What makes the most sense:
A) Spider-Man can stop trains, hold multi-ton objects and has incredible speed, but his punches are weaker than a child's.
B) Doc Ock somehow became immensely durable throughout his whole body.
C) Spider-Man holds back as to not kill human-level opponents because he's a hero and adheres to Uncle Ben's commandment.
D) That fight was PIS and doesn't follow or support.
IMO, it's C with a helping of D
Nope: it's E) Spider-man cannot be shown, realistically, in a fist fight in a PG-13 movie because we'd end up with Gallagher-like head splatting. So the director/editor took some creative license with a helping of suspension of disbelief and created a neat scene where Spider-man is duking it out with Doc Ock as Doc Ock and Spider-man ascend a building in New York City.