Mickey the Pikey versus John McClane...

Started by Nephthys9 pages

I'm unsure if what Rob meant by a 'proper match' for McClane included him getting raped 4 ways from sunday, but I thought it was funny anyway.

Originally posted by Nephthys
I'm unsure if what Rob meant by a 'proper match' for McClane included him getting raped 4 ways from sunday, but I thought it was funny anyway.
I was thinking Riggs but he'd whoop McClane as well.

So the best either of you could come up with to my challenge was bumping an attempted Spite-Thread of RJ's who is known to be the #1 McClane hater?

Haahahahaahhhahaahaaahhhhaaaahahahahahahahhaaaa. You two are funny.

You were unspecific in your request. Besides, this thread demonstrates that you'll refuse to acknowledge anyone as McClanes superior, no matter how far they are above him. Any non-spite thread will obviously never have you admit so much as a challenge to the mighty McClane.

Not sure how "proper opponent" = Necro-raising an RJ spite-thread, to you.

Have you read the thread? I'm guessing no. RJ made it and catered it to give Mickey the advantage, it's a spite-thread through and through.

You're a fanboy. Anything less than complete spite isn't going to cut it for you.

I did read it. Your responses where so ludicrous I was lol'ing throughout.

Originally posted by Robtard
So the best either of you could come up with to my challenge was bumping an attempted Spite-Thread of RJ's who is known to be the #1 McClane hater?

Haahahahaahhhahaahaaahhhhaaaahahahahahahahhaaaa. You two are funny.


Originally posted by Robtard
McClane will feint like he's punching, fall on his back, and plant his kneel right into Mickey's knee, bringing the brawler down in screaming agony. Dirty tactics, sure; this is what McClane employs.

He'll then proceed to bash Mickey's head into the steel cage, until blood comes out his Pikey ears. /the end

Originally posted by Robtard
Well, it was a bit of biased bullshit to put a bare knuckle champion against a brawler and then cater the environment solely to one guy.

Still, my scenario stands, Pikey will be expecting a boxing match, McClane will out think him, feint, drop, kick and ram his head into the steel cage til his ears bleed. This is what McClane does, fights unconventional and dirty; there are four movies to prove it.

You claim it's spite but argued for McClane anyways. For the record I didn't care to bump another thread just because Zan kills your hero. Piece of advice pick a stronger hero not the punching bag McClane has always been.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You claim it's spite but argued for McClane anyways. For the record I didn't care to bump another thread just because Zan kills your hero. Piece of advice pick a stronger hero not the punching bag McClane has always been.

Maybe you should have bothered to post the posts that lead to me posting that? But I guess honestly is too much to expect of you.

Those post were in response to RJ's scripting (as he did often in here) to illustrate how silly scripting is.

Originally posted by Nephthys
You're a fanboy. Anything less than complete spite isn't going to cut it for you.

I did read it. Your responses where so ludicrous I was lol'ing throughout.

Your butt-hurt gives me strength and your concession to my challenge I accepted.

Read it again, this time without bias. Responding with and equal amount of nonsense such as scripting is sensible to an obvious spite-thread.

I believe that it would be literally impossible to read this thread without bias. They'd be about 6 posts left.

Mine. 😐

(and maybe Impediments)

Originally posted by Nephthys
I believe that it would be literally impossible to read this thread without bias. They'd be about 6 posts left.

Mine. 😐

(and maybe Impediments)

I think we can both agree that RJ made this thread out of spite.

I think we can both agree that responding to spite-threads with like nonsense and clownshoery is an okay/expected approach.

So we agree. Hug?

Originally posted by Robtard
Maybe you should have bothered to post the posts that lead to me posting that? But I guess honestly is too much to expect of you.

Those post were in response to RJ's scripting (as he did often in here) to illustrate how silly scripting is.

He obviously disagreed with you in a previous thread which prompted him to make that thread. I don't need to read through every response to get that. You in turn even though you knew McClane lost still argued anyways.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He obviously disagreed with you in a previous thread which prompted him to make that thread. I don't need to read through every response to get that. You in turn even though you knew McClane lost still argued anyways.

As I told you above, I used scripting to illustrate that scripting is nonsense in here. Which part of that can't you follow?

Originally posted by Robtard
As I told you above, I used scripting to illustrate that scripting is nonsense in here. Which part of that can't you follow?
Your pride got in the way and you started arguing for McClane. You McClaniacs really can't help yourselves.

Originally posted by Robtard
I think we can both agree that RJ made this thread out of spite.

I think we can both agree that responding to spite-threads with like nonsense and clownshoery is an okay/expected approach.

So we agree. Hug?

meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh okay

Originally posted by quanchi112
Your pride got in the way and you started arguing for McClane. You McClaniacs really can't help yourselves.

Sure, purposely ignore what I said.

Originally posted by Nephthys
meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh okay

Good, good. *rubs hands creepily together*

Originally posted by Robtard
Sure, purposely ignore what I said.
So you admit McClane loses and badly ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you admit McClane loses and badly ?

You need to learn to be more subtle with the bait-trolling. You'll never get a big fish to bite with the tactics you're employing.

Originally posted by Robtard
You need to learn to be more subtle with the bait-trolling. You'll never get a big fish to bite with the tactics you're employing.
You stated you weren't seriously arguing throughout this thread. I want to hear you say McClane loses since you strongly implied it. Does he lose ?