Originally posted by Autokrat
Nice little rhetorical trick you pulled here, trying to draw DS into claiming an absolute... anyways.
Thats the claim he made hence why i asked him to give the exact quote.
It has been here for thousands of years. It is a place where Sith teachings run strong… It is the threshold of the borders of an ancient empire. Kreia says that it was a place of reflection for the ancient Sith… a gateway to their lands. It drew Lord Revan… and it calls to her as well. She said that the teachings here will lead one to the Sith… the true Sith… and all their shadowed worlds. This place led Revan to the graveyards of Korriban… and beyond."
^ The part that i highlighted interests me.
How do we know that revan didn't simply plunder the academy just to look for the true sith rather than plundering it for every single force knowledge?
Originally posted by Autokrat
That's Sion's little blurb on it, the Chronicles of the Old Republic mention it, one of the loading screen blurbs mention it. Seeing as how clearly Revan had learned a lot of Sith Knowledge, which certainly at the very [b]least impressed Bane, I don't see why this is even being argued. [/B]
Impressed a bane that was studying under a bunch of weaklings. Something like that is going to obviously impress you espcially when you have been studying under ignorant jokes that called themselves "dark lords of the sith".
DS is making an almost unsubstatiated claim, first off he's claiming that revan mastered everything he learned from korriban and malachor which is ridiculous(funny that if thats the case, he still had time to run his campaign against the republic) and he has nothing to back his claims up.
Now hes saying that everything revan learned was ub3r but he failed to even name one technique(other than the thought bomb which is more of a ritual than personal power).