😂
this thread has been hilarious. rage was exactly correct--this thread was meant to limit jugg's durability. clearly all his enchantments weren't cancelled by thor or else he could have breathed on marko and killed him instead of beating on him for a full minute.
i said in a previous post--assume herc and juggs had the SAME durability, and that this was simply h2h based on strength and skill. some were saying juggs stronger than herc. i've still seen no proof that regular juggs>herc so again, with equal durability and full strength levels for both, herc wins, handily imo.
the thread says 'shield' not 'force field'. it was meant to imply WHATEVER it is that grants juggs complete invulnerability has been removed. like i said--it is possible for him to be ko'd. of course a regular invulnerable juggs would eventually win a brawl (unless herc could bfr him). the purpose of the thread was basically to see who'd win using just strength. not that difficult . . .
as for the force field--he had it up when thor threw the hammer. he never took it down. we have don't see if the GB hit juggs, but since he was simply being pushed back, it is easy to see how it was hitting just the FF. beyond that, there is the whole thing about the writer using the FF as juggs source of invulnerabilty. it was raised in the later arc where thor was going to finish him with a PUNCH. up for a throw, up for a punch. of course it was up for the GB. to say it wasn't, is illogical and goes against the entirety of both arcs. yoy can say you disagree with how it was portrayed (though even without it juggs had some pretty good invulnerabilty as he stood up to thor for a minute) but it is clear the writer intended for the FF to account for the bulk of his invulnerability, and it's clear it was intended to be up for the GB, imo. that GB was a battle between jugg's 'unstoppability' and the GB, and the GB was getting the better of things in the short time they battled each other.
anyway, with equal durability and using just strength/skill in h2h, herc wins.