Batman vs. John McClane

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
you honestly think he can move faster then a bullet can leave a chamber?

hahaha even comic book batman isnt that fast outside of his usual PIS riddled self.

yes I do.. watching the dark knight proves it.. I don't see Batman just standing given what Impediment said

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
you honestly think he can move faster then a bullet can leave a chamber?

hahaha even comic book batman isnt that fast outside of his usual PIS riddled self.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
yes I do..

crylaugh crylaugh crylaugh

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
crylaugh crylaugh crylaugh

haha ha ha ha

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
yes I do.. watching the dark knight proves it.. I don't see Batman just standing given what Impediment said

since i edited my post

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
yes I do.. watching the dark knight proves it.. I don't see Batman just standing given what Impediment said

You also dont see Batman facing a gunman anywhere near McClanes skill level, much less one armed with a submachine gun.

Your fanboy is showing.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
You also dont see Batman facing a gunman anywhere near McClanes skill level, much less one armed with a submachine gun.

Your fanboy is showing.

i thought dark knight and jokers performance to be vastly overrated
but still.in a split second,batman shoots the batarangs at mcclanes hands,dodges out the way,runs up while mcclane is tending to his hand,and feeds him pieces of his skull

hes not dodging anything before the bullet leaves the chamber. nothing in the movies showed that he had the speed to do that.

if Mjohns gun is pointed at Batman and John pulls the trigger with the gun still pointed at batman batman is dead. the end.

now can batman escape into the shadows before john can aim at him? possibly. but hes not beating the bullet.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
You also dont see Batman facing a gunman anywhere near McClanes skill level, much less one armed with a submachine gun.

Your fanboy is showing.

and what are you a fanboy of?

It is you who should actually read the OP again and again.. where in the OP does it state that McClane starts to fire the moment he sees Batman .. it does not state that..

you assume McClane has the drop on Batman , but it fact that is not the case

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
hes not dodging anything [b]before the bullet leaves the chamber. nothing in the movies showed that he had the speed to do that.

if Mjohns gun is pointed at Batman and John pulls the trigger with the gun still pointed at batman batman is dead. the end.

now can batman escape into the shadows before john can aim at him? possibly. but hes not beating the bullet. [/B]

what makes you think McClane even gets a chance?

i dont know but i dont care either. im only referring to this:

you honestly think he can move faster then a bullet can leave a chamber?

yes I do.. watching the dark knight proves it.. I don't see Batman just standing given what Impediment said

do you know what youre saying here? youre saying that you think batman moves faster then a bullet moving at the speed of sound. that is extremely untrue and nothing in the movies supports that. batman "dodges" bullets by disappearing before the gun is fired. he doesnt dodge them after the gun is fired.

Wouldn't Batman have already deduced via logic and intel from Lucius Fox that John couldn't possibly be one of the terrorists?

no he wouldnt because lucius only did the intel thing once and he vowed to never do it again... lucius isnt a constant part of bales team.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
i dont know but i dont care either. im only referring to this:

do you know what youre saying here? youre saying that you think batman moves faster then a bullet moving at the speed of sound. that is extremely untrue and nothing in the movies supports that. batman "dodges" bullets by disappearing before the gun is fired. he doesnt dodge them after the gun is fired.

actually no.. i am not saying that... in The Dark Knight Batman is taking care of business when he is beating up the folks with the guns..

now as I have stated.. Yeah McClane is capable of shooting Batman, but that does mean he is going to..

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
actually no.. i am not saying that... in The Dark Knight Batman is taking care of business when he is beating up the folks with the guns..

now as I have stated.. Yeah McClane is capable of shooting Batman, but that does mean he is going to..

then why did you say that you believed he could? 😐

batarang=bat's victory

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
then why did you say that you believed he could? 😐

McClane is good, there is no disputing that, but that doesn't mean Batman is a wimp like people are making him out to be..

anyway, I have to get up early and go to work.. this is by far the best conversation I've had here on KMC in a while.. Good talking with you Ms. Marvel, I hope it continues in this thread and in others.. 🙂 😄

Batman trips on his own cape as he tries in vain to avoid McClane's gunfire, falls backward down staircase breaking his neck in four places.

If not, McClane uses the detonators to trigger the C4 on the floor that Bats is on blow the shit out of boy-wonder-buggerer...?

Batman for the win.

Had it been on a nice wide open field with 100 meters between them, I could have seen McClane taking down Batman, but in a skyscraper with multiple hiding spots and possibilities for seeking cover, that is more ore less in the setting that Batman works best.

that works both ways.

if theyre in a corridor with one door on each end of the hallway batman is screwed because he doesnt have the space necessary to dodge.

There wasn't alot of hallways in that skyscraper iirc from the movie 😛

Either way I agree, however I don't think that was the opening setting that Impendiment had in mind, even if Batman still has a chance of throwing himself backwards towards the door but that is a far shoot.