Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Decided to respond to one of Cresh' posts.What the hell does this have to do with comics? A movie franchise is a fairly different story than a comic.
Disney won't touch the comics, their main focus is animated/television/movie media. This has been more or less explicitly stated.
They do not want to change Marvel to appeal to younger boys, Marvel do that ANYWAY with Marvel Kids. They just want a cut of the money that comes with having a primarily male fanbase.
Why do you keep ignoring that?
You have LITERALLY no basis to assume the comics are in danger. None.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Disney won't touch the comics, their main focus is animated/television/movie media. This has been more or less explicitly stated.They do not want to change Marvel to appeal to younger boys, Marvel do that ANYWAY with Marvel Kids. They just want a cut of the money that comes with having a primarily male fanbase.
Why do you keep ignoring that?
You have LITERALLY no basis to assume the comics are in danger. None.
-AC
Co-signed. It's also fairly clear that being able to use the characters in their parks would be a huge money boost. Imagine Cap walking around Epcot or a Spider-Man themed coaster. It would appeal to more people, thus more money.
"Wait and see," my approach here, includes both eventualities: good and bad. But there's no reason to jump to the bad, especially when there's evidence to the contrary like the Miramax thing.
Originally posted by gobstakid777
I almost busted a nut upon first gazing at this pic
Really? That's all it takes? Star that chick in what would have to be a Beastiality-themed film, then we'll talk.
Originally posted by Darth Vicious
I wonder if Disney would have objections to pics like the one below. Not ur granddaughters Little Mermaid.
JAILBAIT!! she's just 16 iirc
i still don't get why they had to buy the whole company if they're just going to build rides and make movies, isn't there a cheaper way, (i know nothing about how these things work btw)
I am actually looking forward to this, especially for Marvel's future movie prospects. Pixar has been known for years for its high quality films, both in terms of CGI quality and plotlines. I do not doubt there is any number of ways the folks there could use their knowledge and experience to make some very, very memorable films. 🙂
Originally posted by DigiI blame this picture:
I see more of a red-headed Megan Fox, whose facial features sometimes resemble a cartoon more than real-life human. Not getting too much of SQGirl personally.
Originally posted by manjaroEh, they included they gluteal cleft. I guess that means she has vestigial gluteus maximus muscles.
why draw her with a perfectly apple shaped booty and making the green scales look like leggings when thats supposed to be her skin?(providing that mermaids are real and all) does she rip her skin off to take dumps or what? is this a real comic character or fan art?
Stan Lee gives his blessings and assures that it will not damage age-old Marvel comic mythology.
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/theresistance/news/?a=9696
Originally posted by Darth Vicious
I wonder if Disney would have objections to pics like the one below. Not ur granddaughters Little Mermaid.
* add this to the list... same artist (J. Scott Campbell)...
* snow white:
* alice:
* beauty (and the beast):
* cinderella:
* tinkerbell:
* the wicked queen maleficent:
* sleeping beauty:
* well... who do you like most? 😛
Originally posted by peejayd
* add this to the list... same artist (J. Scott Campbell)...* snow white:
* alice:
* beauty (and the beast):
* cinderella:
* tinkerbell:
* the wicked queen maleficent:
* sleeping beauty:
* well... who do you like most? 😛
I got those too. The 2nd one looks like a naughty Baroness playing dress up. Cinderella looks like Emma Frost.