Did God make animals wrong?

Started by LLLLLink13 pages

Ah, but the Leviticus verse you posted is in reference to wizards and speaks of an evil curse, not swearing profanity as you said.

In the OT, resistance to discipline was equal to saying "I'm evil, I'll never change." That's what it's saying, anyway.

i am sure i didnt post any Leviticus quotes simply cut and paste the one's i reference with name/chapter.. the links were just there to show where it came from.

Originally posted by LLLLLink
Humans are living beings requiring nourishment to sustain life and reproduce to keep the species continuing, like animals (or plants for that matter). Unanimously shared traits end there.

A bird is nothing like a human. A fish is nothing like a human. Even apes are radically different from humans.

Also, as far as "handing off your daughter" goes, it is less that the Bible advocates it and more that the culture promoted it, like you said.

So, are you saying that a person who is mentally handicapped, to the point were they have a brain function of that of a fish, is not human, and is an animal?

well it is a complicated question to answer

Originally posted by King Castle
well it is a complicated question to answer

Ya, us dyslexic people are pretty dumb.

cloning is a bad idea

I don't think they should clone at all.

too late look up they id it to the bushes?

also why dont you think we should clone? does the bible say that?

I know that they did it already and as far as I know it has nothing to do with cloning in the bible.I am just sick and tired of Scienctist trying to play God.

how so? i mean more often they use cloning techniques for plants or wanting to grow certain types of animals so we can eat and not consume an entire resource.. possibly use cloning to replenish food stock like fish.

if we dont start using cloning we will eventually consume certain resources on the planet and have us starving and animals going into extinction. dont you think cloning can be used for noble ends or is not being used for noble ends?

Because they are creating something that was created by him.

Originally posted by King Castle
how so? i mean more often they use cloning techniques for plants or wanting to grow certain types of animals so we can eat and not consume an entire resource.. possibly use cloning to replenish food stock like fish.

if we dont start using cloning we will eventually consume certain resources on the planet and have us starving and animals going into extinction. dont you think cloning can be used for noble ends or is not being used for noble ends?

I have no problem with it, in a couple hundred years from now. Right now, we are like cavemen playing with a gun.

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
Because they are creating something that was created by him.

Cloning is not creating new life. Cloning is just the same thing as twins (no really but close enough for my point).

It is still humans doing something that is not normal and nothing good can come out of that.

so we should stop growing cloned spliced plants? what do u think would happen if he stopped tomorrow with plants?

u think its better to let ppl starve and die and fight for resources?

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
It is still humans doing something that is not normal and nothing good can come out of that.

Doing something? Are you advocating faith exclusive healing too?

i am scared of what she is implying.

direct manipulation of our food resource goes back thousands of yrs from breeding programs and herding and plant splicing.

we are simply taking the next step which in itself isnt that bad... instead of letting a certain bull or whatever inseminate an egg we are simply taking the sperm and making sure that the egg gets the right traits that we find desirable.. like size and muscle/fat.

if ppl dont want their animals to be manipulated in anyway they should then go hunt wild steer and good luck with that.

lets be honest where is the line drawn and why? what makes one form of manipulation over another better?

Originally posted by King Castle
i am scared of what she is implying.

direct manipulation of our food resource goes back thousands of yrs from breeding programs and herding and plant splicing.

we are simply taking the next step which in itself isnt that bad... instead of letting a certain bull or whatever inseminate an egg we are simply taking the sperm and making sure that the egg gets the right traits that we find desirable.. like size and muscle/fat.

if ppl dont want their animals to be manipulated in anyway they should then go hunt wild steer and good luck with that.

lets be honest where is the line drawn and why? what makes one form of manipulation over another better?

Wild steer? 😆 I think the cow is so far removed from it's wild ancestor, that they are no longer the same animal.

dont laugh its not funny.. i mean you wont run into a giant bull or cow running feral with tusk and a winter coat but you might find this in cali up in the hills in san diego near camp pendleton firing range.

not sure if u would be charged with a federal crime if caught or if u manage to kill it.

Originally posted by King Castle
dont laugh its not funny.. i mean you wont run into a giant bull or cow running feral with tusk and a winter coat but you might find this in cali up in the hills in san diego near camp pendleton firing range.

not sure if u would be charged with a federal crime if caught or if u manage to kill it.

Well, you can't use a gun, because that was made by humans. Hands only; I think we would become vegetarian.

BTW, beautiful animal.