ROTS Sidious vs Orbalisk Bane

Started by darthbanelives11 pages

figures

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
I think the main argument you can give against the quotes supporting Sidious is that those are referring to him at the peak of his power AND whether or not it is specifically referring to his abilities in a duel. I tend to think that many of the quotes they give do not directly refer to fighting ability. Instead, power might be the fact that he controlled both sides of the Clone Wars. That leaves things much more open for discussion and makes more sense to me.

Oh, look, it's the usual "LALALALALA POLITICAL POWER" stuff you're so fond of when you're in denial. Despite how most of them expressly refer to force ability and it's almost never referred to in another way with force users.

DarthBaneLives

well i mean the back cover of DoE that i'm looking at states "If the dark side's most powerful master capture the ultimate secret, the sith will never die-and neither will darth bane. that's just one example. as far as others, i don't remember exactly where all these quotes are.

Well, find them. One referring to ALL TIME, not present tense. And when are back covers canon info anyways?


Yeah his essay does say alot, but i still think in a FIGHT, bane would win.

Prove it.

if they sat down and saw who was smarter or better at political machinations, yeah sidious would probably win, but in a straight up fight, i couldn't see old man palps coming out alive.

I don't care what a Bane fanboy thinks or sees. Back it up."OMG ORBALISKS" is basically all you've provided.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Oh, look, it's the usual "LALALALALA POLITICAL POWER" stuff you're so fond of when you're in denial. Despite how most of them expressly refer to force ability and it's almost never referred to in another way with force users.

DarthBaneLives

Well, find them. One referring to ALL TIME, not present tense. And when are back covers canon info anyways?

Prove it.

I don't care what a Bane fanboy thinks or sees. Back it up."OMG ORBALISKS" is basically all you've provided.

noobaris is a troll. you are feeding him. stop.

darthbanelives isn't neb.

haha feeding me? it seems that i'm feeding him...i'm just stating that i think bane would win in a fight and no one can prove that he wouldn't really...not a big deal. i'm far from a Bane fanboy though....he's not even my favorite sith. Orbalisks are great though, i'd love to see them in a game or something as like an unlockable armor. anybody got any ideas on what they are gonna announce at the Vga's on dec 12th? just curious

DBL, we have a notorious member who supports bane utterly to the death, name of neb. I think One Free Guy thought you were him.

I see what you are saying, but are you familiar with the fact that Sidious managed to reduce the ability of 10,000 jedi to draw on the force? (per ROTS, and one of the Ultimate guides.)

A feat more impressive and on a scale larger than anything bane ever accomplished, imo.

idk haha thats pretty good but idk...doesn't really change my thoughts on the outcome of this duel. impressive though. i liked sidious's force worm holes those were cool. and did he learn the secret of essence transfer from andeddu's holocron after dooku found it, just as bane did?

i couldn't tell you that one. Not sure where he learned it. Not a comic book follower myself, and i haven't read about Dooku finding the holocron, is it from a comic?

yeah it is i'm pretty sure, i just looked at it on the wook and assumed that dooku gave it to sidious and thats when he learned to do it.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Oh, look, it's the usual "LALALALALA POLITICAL POWER" stuff you're so fond of when you're in denial. Despite how most of them expressly refer to force ability and it's almost never referred to in another way with force users.

The reason I think it refers to his all around power is because he is the only who relied more on other areas to accomplish his goals. He wasn't combat oriented. He was still extremely capable and I will say that he was probably the most powerful (including combat) Force user ever (Luke being the only possible exception) by Dark Empire. As of ROTS, I don't think that he is the best Sith in a fight. He simply hasn't demonstrated the extreme abilities that would give him that mantle.

The key to not embarrassing yourself in this forum is to realize that your favorite doesn't win.

Analogy: I think Kratos is the most badass. Kratos couldn't beat chuck norris, and I accept this.

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
The reason I think it refers to his all around power is because he is the only who relied more on other areas to accomplish his goals. He wasn't combat oriented. He was still extremely capable and I will say that he was probably the most powerful (including combat) Force user ever (Luke being the only possible exception) by Dark Empire. As of ROTS, I don't think that he is the best Sith in a fight. He simply hasn't demonstrated the extreme abilities that would give him that mantle.
Fighting one of the most powerful Jedi in history to a standstill doesn't say much, huh?

Originally posted by One Free Man
The key to not embarrassing yourself in this forum is to realize that your favorite doesn't win.

Analogy: I think Kratos is the most badass. Kratos couldn't beat chuck norris, and I accept this.

Hmmm... I dunno... I think Kratos might take him.

Originally posted by darthbanelives
haha feeding me? it seems that i'm feeding him...i'm just stating that i think bane would win in a fight and no one can prove that he wouldn't really...not a big deal. i'm far from a Bane fanboy though....he's not even my favorite sith. Orbalisks are great though, i'd love to see them in a game or something as like an unlockable armor. anybody got any ideas on what they are gonna announce at the Vga's on dec 12th? just curious

Nobody has to prove he WOULDN'T, you need to prove he was. And the orbaliasks? Not invincible with the dark side and don't cover his head.

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
The reason I think it refers to his all around power is because he is the only who relied more on other areas to accomplish his goals. He wasn't combat oriented. He was still extremely capable and I will say that he was probably the most powerful (including combat) Force user ever (Luke being the only possible exception) by Dark Empire. As of ROTS, I don't think that he is the best Sith in a fight. He simply hasn't demonstrated the extreme abilities that would give him that mantle.

You 'think' it referred to others? Based on what, precisely? And he wasn't combat oriented? Yet he managed to take out three of the best swordsmen who ever lived before they could do anything? He's called the most powerful as of ROTS several times and you need to get off the inane idea this refers to 'political' power when he was not only ruling LESS than some other Sith Lords by that point as the Empire hadn't yet grown to its fullest extent, but somehow this 'political' thing seems to merely apply to Palpatine and never when Kun, Ragnos or Bane's powers are mentioned? It's an annoying double standard

And taking on the most powerful Jedi ever doesn't give him skills? Killing three of the most talented swordsmen in Jedi history instantly? Being unable to be remotely perceived by Darth Maul of all people?

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
Fighting one of the most powerful Jedi in history to a standstill doesn't say much, huh?

Not when Sith have shown to be much more powerful than Jedi on a one-on-one basis.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
You 'think' it referred to others? Based on what, precisely?

On exactly what I just said. He relied much more on political power to accomplish his goals that other Sith.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
And he wasn't combat oriented? Yet he managed to take out three of the best swordsmen who ever lived before they could do anything?

We are already talking about the best of the best. Those "three of the best" he killed are still dramatically weaker than top level people. Also, I never said he was bad at combat, it's just inferior to his political skills.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
He's called the most powerful as of ROTS several times and you need to get off the inane idea this refers to 'political' power when he was not only ruling LESS than some other Sith Lords by that point as the Empire hadn't yet grown to its fullest extent, but somehow this 'political' thing seems to merely apply to Palpatine and never when Kun, Ragnos or Bane's powers are mentioned? It's an annoying double standard

He controlled both the CIS and the Republic. WTF do you mean he was ruling less than other Sith Lords? Even the Empire at its smallest under his rule was still far bigger than the previous Sith Empires.

Kun, Ragnos, and Bane were not crafty like Sidious. That wasn't their game. You know me, I don't take outside quotes with much merit anyway. I've said for the longest time that we need to look at feats first and foremost, with in-universe quotes being very important as well. What an out of universe person might have said doesn't change what is actually portrayed in the books, comics, movies, etc so should have no higher authority than fan generated consensus.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
And taking on the most powerful Jedi ever doesn't give him skills? Killing three of the most talented swordsmen in Jedi history instantly? Being unable to be remotely perceived by Darth Maul of all people?

I'm not saying that he wasn't extremely capable at fighting. I will also challenge you claim that Yoda was the most powerful Jedi ever (Luke). I will say Yoda is the second most powerful, but the Sith have shown that they are more powerful on a one-on-one basis than Jedi so even if Sidious equals the second most powerful Jedi there are still other Sith who might be more powerful than him at that point.

Yoda "The most powerful foe the darkness has ever known"

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
On exactly what I just said. He relied much more on political power to accomplish his goals that other Sith.

So? Sith value the power of the dark side most and Palpatine is described as the most powerful of them. Again, by THAT point, he arguably had less political power than other Sith. How does this make him weaker in combat and other Sith and why do ALL these sources suddenly decide to make it 'political' power?

We are already talking about the best of the best. Those "three of the best" he killed are still dramatically weaker than top level people. Also, I never said he was bad at combat, it's just inferior to his political skills.


How do you compare political skills to combat ability and how would it make him lesser in combat than others?
Show me one other Sith Lord effortlessly killing three of the best swordsmen ever in seconds, btw. And no, Traya doesn't count unless you can prove either of their skills besides Kavar amongst the best ever.


He controlled both the CIS and the Republic. WTF do you mean he was ruling less than other Sith Lords? Even the Empire at its smallest under his rule was still far bigger than the previous Sith Empires.

Darth Ruin ruled an enormous chunk of the galaxy...Ragnos ruled hundreds of worlds....He LED the Republic, and secretly led the CIS...that's not incredible political power as opposed to a single autocratic ruler


Kun, Ragnos, and Bane were not crafty like Sidious. That wasn't their game. You know me, I don't take outside quotes with much merit anyway. I've said for the longest time that we need to look at feats first and foremost, with in-universe quotes being very important as well. What an out of universe person might have said doesn't change what is actually portrayed in the books, comics, movies, etc so should have no higher authority than fan generated consensus.

Palpatine has a ton of those.. And out of universe quotes are still canon anyways...and Kun, Ragnos and Bane weren't crafty?


I'm not saying that he wasn't extremely capable at fighting. I will also challenge you claim that Yoda was the most powerful Jedi ever (Luke). I will say Yoda is the second most powerful, but the Sith have shown that they are more powerful on a one-on-one basis than Jedi so even if Sidious equals the second most powerful Jedi there are still other Sith who might be more powerful than him at that point.

Oh, honestly. When have the Sith shown a consistent basis to be more powerful than the JEdi on one on one? Revan as a Jedi would be a match for any Sith. Yoda-who, my apologies was the strongest to that point...you'd need to prove Yoda's inferiority to any other Sith for that to be viable. And no Sith has shown to be stronger than Yoda.

Palpatine's already named almost expressly stronger than Bane by TPM...by ROTs, he's referred to consistently as the strongest.

Originally posted by Jinsoku Takai
Hmmm... I dunno... I think Kratos might take him.
Oh i agree. it was just an analogy. nobody can kill kratos.