Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Yes and we discussed this last time you are delusional. i think you were coming out withs oem nosnense that he cant be killed by conventional means.Anyway what facts?
I'm pretty sure the conclusion we came to is that you where uninformed and didn't have enough information to comment on this topic and retain any amount of credibility.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I'm pretty sure the conclusion we came to is that you where uninformed and didn't have enough information to comment on this topic and retain any amount of credibility.
What actually happened was I got some facts wrong but it still proved my point you naturally misintepreted it because you always need to distort shit to prove your point is correct. It was some dumb shit like Taskmaster couldnt hurt Shang with his sword. I pointed out that Shang had a grueling fight with Zaran. What happened was that he got owned but it still proved he could get killed with a sword.
Again what facts?
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
What actually happened was I got some facts wrong but it still proved my point you naturally misintepreted it because you always need to distort shit to prove your point is correct. It was some dumb shit like Taskmaster couldnt hurt Shang with his sword. I pointed out that Shang had a grueling fight with Zaran. What happened was that he got owned but it still proved he could get killed with a sword.Again what facts?
🙄
Shang-Chi, walked all over Zaran in that "fight," it was nothing remotely resembling grueling. If I recall correctly your point (and I use the term lightly) was that Shang-Chi blocking swords / projectiles was proof that Taskmaster could beat him, and my point was that it was a dated example of Shang-Chi, and it wouldn't mean much if it did support your claims... which it didn't.