Battlezone stipulations, Thor vs Superman

Started by KK the Great11 pages
Originally posted by batdude123

mos dfntly

Originally posted by KK the Great
mos dfntly

You happen to have a link of it?

Batdude, I don't know where you get those images, but they are always funny

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Batdude, I don't know where you get those images, but they are always funny

A magical place called google.

Originally posted by batdude123
BRB vs. Captain Atom?

Sound good to me.

Originally posted by batdude123
The hell it isn't.
Why didn't you answer me when I asked you? You shouldn't be accepting the very same battlezone against someone who already turned this down to try and steal from my thunder.
Originally posted by xJLxKing
So Quan already backed out?
I am still on for it, but not if batdude is going to have a warm up round against someone else with the same exact characters we already decided on. I gave anyone else ample time to accept this challenge and when they didn't I accepted.
Originally posted by KK the Great
They were fundamental logical conceits. In fact one time it was you explicitly arguing that context doesn't matter.

Of course it becomes a "flame war" (more like a bukakke circle, but whatever) by the end. The end doesn't happen for 30 something pages. By then there's nothing left of your arguments to dismantle, and we settle in to make fun of your impotent efforts to continue.

I'm not sure how you could have come to that conclusion, anyway, as I've never seen you make a legitimate point. It's usually something more along the lines of "the Bride can only sever limbs because people in her universe are made of paper" or any number of comparable gems.

No, you are simply confusing me yet again. A win was a win and in sports arguments we don't excuse the loser because he wasn't up to par when the contest took place.

You also took that too literally. I more than backed up my case. It went on for over 2,000 responses to where you and your cronies kept asking me the same questions over and over again which I already answered a few dozen times.

Originally posted by KK the Great
It would appear so.

And after he advertised the match on other boards, bragging about how hard he was going to own batdude.

I merely said I was going to win because that's what I intend to do. My argument will speak for itself. I'll even create a thread on herochat when it goes down to where icters can vote on who wins based on the arguments we present.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Hey hey, I'm not looking to cancel this fight.

I want to do a battlezone with Batdude, but if Quanchi's going to use this as an excuse to back out, I'll just rep someone else. We could do a BRB vs someone, or Loki vs someone.

Then don't you dare try to weasel your way in to something I accepted. That's just terrible of you as I gave you the chance. Once I challenged your dedication to the character only then did you want to do this battlezone.

Originally posted by batdude123
You happen to have a link of it?

I do.

Originally posted by KK the Great
I do.
Hahahaha, a sarcastic response to an attempt at flaming me. You really are a sad individual. Grasping at straws like usual.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, you are simply confusing me yet again.

Undoubtedly.

A win was a win and in sports arguments we don't excuse the loser because he wasn't up to par when the contest took place.

We both know how this continues.

I test your confidence in that logic by seeing if you'll apply it to Buster Douglas vs. Mike Tyson, then you reveal that you have no confidence in your logic whatsoever. Then we move on to a different, equally weak facet of your argument, until you eventually return to this point once you think everyone has forgotten that you already lost on it.

Originally posted by KK the Great
Undoubtedly.

We both know how this continues.

I test your confidence in that logic by seeing if you'll apply it to Buster Douglas vs. Mike Tyson, then you reveal that you have no confidence in your logic whatsoever. Then we move on to a different, equally weak facet of your argument, until you eventually return to this point once you think everyone has forgotten that you already lost on it.

Sigh, you confused my whole argument, but you do it all the time so I am used to it by now.

The whole argument went south as you mistakenly assumed rocky matching up against lang and drago has some sort of relevance in drago vs. lang.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Sigh, you confused my whole argument, but you do it all the time so I am used to it by now.

The whole argument went south as you mistakenly assumed rocky matching up against lang and drago has some sort of relevance in drago vs. lang.

Right. I mistakenly thought that comparing their performance against the same fighter was relevant.

Never change, quanchi.

Originally posted by KK the Great
Right. I mistakenly thought that comparing their performance against the same fighter was relevant.

Never change, quanchi.

It's an abc argument that has no basis for an entirely different opponent. Are their fighting styles the same? Do they have the same reach, weigh the same, etc.? I guess since Glads has no shot against the Surfer then he has no shot against someone like Thor. Amrite? Forget about the context that goes along with it.

I won't change applying common sense and logic while you can keep on truckin' with your abc logic, mister.

But wait. Out of the two of us, one spent the first several pages with an argument that amounted to little more than "Clubber beat Rocky and Drago didn't." Which one of us was that? I can't remember. Do you remember which one that was? I think it might have been me, but I can't remember. I hope you remember so we can clear this up.

Surely it wasn't you, since, as you well know, I'm the one who "mistakenly assumed rocky matching up against lang and drago has some sort of relevance in drago vs. lang." So surely it must have been me who argued over and over and over that "Clubber beat Rocky and Drago didn't." Because you would never do that, since it is a mistake to assume that Rocky matching up against Lang and Drago has some sort of relevance in Drago vs. Lang. So there's no way your entire argument centered on Clubber having beaten Rocky. No way.

I'm not the one who was arguing in favor of Clubber, so I can't fathom why I would have been making that argument over and over and over, but one of us was, so I guess it must have been me. Because it couldn't possibly have been you.

Right?

so basically, you're just butthurt? let it go.

it's already discouraging quan from the fight, and you're not batdude.

Quanchi needs several months to prepare, and what he's really hoping is that people forget about it by then.

so it's your sworn duty to troll him with trivialities in efforts to.......do what exactly?

it's time to apply the preparation-H me thinks.

Quan aint worth it by any means, Ignore is the best option.

The more attention he gets, the more he reacts.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
so it's your sworn duty to troll him with trivialities in efforts to.......do what exactly?

Make him feel bad about himself, deep down.

Originally posted by KK the Great
Undoubtedly.

We both know how this continues.

I test your confidence in that logic by seeing if you'll apply it to Buster Douglas vs. Mike Tyson, then you reveal that you have no confidence in your logic whatsoever. Then we move on to a different, equally weak facet of your argument, until you eventually return to this point once you think everyone has forgotten that you already lost on it.

Please go into further detail on your analogy of Buster vs. Tyson. I'm dying to see this.

Originally posted by KK the Great
But wait. Out of the two of us, one spent the first several pages with an argument that amounted to little more than "Clubber beat Rocky and Drago didn't." Which one of us was that? I can't remember. Do you remember which one that was? I think it might have been me, but I can't remember. I hope you remember so we can clear this up.

Surely it wasn't you, since, as you well know, I'm the one who "mistakenly assumed rocky matching up against lang and drago has some sort of relevance in drago vs. lang." So surely it must have been me who argued over and over and over that "Clubber beat Rocky and Drago didn't." Because you would never do that, since it is a mistake to assume that Rocky matching up against Lang and Drago has some sort of relevance in Drago vs. Lang. So there's no way your entire argument centered on Clubber having beaten Rocky. No way.

I'm not the one who was arguing in favor of Clubber, so I can't fathom why I would have been making that argument over and over and over, but one of us was, so I guess it must have been me. Because it couldn't possibly have been you.

Right?

I said any way you look at it Lang wins. Lang's style and Drago's approach to both fights we saw him fight in took either free blows or was cut badly early on my rocky. Lang ko's him and even beat rocky which he couldn't do. Anyway you look at the fight Lang beats him.

Now let's keep this out of this thread. I know you miss me as I have been on kmc and have been neglecting herochat lately, but I'll be back there sooner or later. Please, you'll just have to be patient.

Originally posted by KK the Great
Quanchi needs several months to prepare, and what he's really hoping is that people forget about it by then.
No, it's going to happen otherwise why would I create this thread? Is this all a part of my master plan to make people forget?
Originally posted by psycho gundam
so it's your sworn duty to troll him with trivialities in efforts to.......do what exactly?

it's time to apply the preparation-H me thinks.

Other posters recognized this as well on herochat. It seems he's so butthurt he even follows me to other boards.