Originally posted by Robtard
Episode: The Doomsday Machinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Doomsday_Machine
So in short, Kirk's Enterprise could likely survive a hit from the Deathstar, though with heavy damage.
even if that weren't true, the fact that 24th century defensive technology is far, far superior would speak volumes as to what they can survive.
Originally posted by -Pr-
even if that weren't true, the fact that 24th century defensive technology is far, far superior would speak volumes as to what they can survive.
Star Wars fleets can fight week long battles against other fleets using 2.4 million megaton weapons.
Star Trek ships get damaged by volleys of 1160 megaton weapons.
2.4 million is 2,068.96552 more than 1160, and Star Wars fleets fight for WEEKS while sustaining constant hits of that caliber.
Originally posted by -Pr-
even if that weren't true, the fact that 24th century defensive technology is far, far superior would speak volumes as to what they can survive.
Another comparison. The Sun Crusher, one of the more powerful Star Wars weapons; which is supposed to be basically indestructible by conventional means survived a glancing hit from the Death Star.
Yet an outdated Star Trek ship takes a full planet-busting hit and survives. Pretty telling.
Originally posted by Robtard
Another comparison. The Sun Crusher, one of the more powerful Star Wars weapons; which is supposed to be basically indestructible by conventional means survived a glancing hit from the Death Star.Yet an outdated Star Trek ship takes a full planet-busting hit and survives. Pretty telling.
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Star Wars fleets can fight week long battles against other fleets using 2.4 million megaton weapons.Star Trek ships get damaged by volleys of 1160 megaton weapons.
2.4 million is 2,068.96552 more than 1160, and Star Wars fleets fight for WEEKS while sustaining constant hits of that caliber.
Originally posted by XanatosForever
I'm sorry, but where did you get the idea that transporters are prone to malfunction? Barring the horrible Enterprise series (which was supposed to be the first ever launch of and indtroduction of many of Trek basic tech) transporters work just fine.
Star Trek 2009 movie; the tranporters tranported a guy into that water tube.
Star Wars: 200 trillion gigawatt reactor core
Star Trek: 15 billion gigawatt reactor core
Originally posted by XanatosForever
The Star Trek 2009 movie was set in an alternate timeline, where it was the Enterprise's first launch and transporters were new technology. That should hardly be counted against the continuity of the canon Star Trek universe.
Since when were transporters new technology in that movie?
BTW:
Star Wars: 200 trillion gigawatt reactor core
Star Trek: 15 billion gigawatt reactor core
Originally posted by The Nuul
Kirk's ship also took a punch from Gladiator whos on Supes level.
Ok, now you're definitely trolling.
Originally posted by XanatosForever
The Star Trek 2009 movie was set in an alternate timeline, where it was the Enterprise's first launch and transporters were new technology. That should hardly be counted against the continuity of the canon Star Trek universe.
He's wrong to boot. When Scotty was transported into the water tube, it was done from extremely long distances and into a ship that was in warp from the surface of a planet. This was the first time something like this had been tried.
Transporters work just fine. Besides, Kirk's Enterprise can take more than 999 Stardestroyers could dish out. This is a no-contest in terms of ship power.
Originally posted by RobtardTransporters work just fine. Besides, Kirk's Enterprise can take more than 999 Stardestroyers could dish out. This is a no-contest in terms of ship power.
Using your logic against you, the Anakin Solo star destroyer (named after Anakin Solo) survived an attack by Centerpoint Station, which created a black hole to attack the GFFA fleet. A black hole is more powerful than a planet buster, AND the Anakin Solo came out unscathed.
So yes, this is a no-contest; Star Wars easily outmatches Star Trek.
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Star Wars fleets can fight week long battles against other fleets using 2.4 million megaton weapons.Star Trek ships get damaged by volleys of 1160 megaton weapons.
2.4 million is 2,068.96552 more than 1160, and Star Wars fleets fight for WEEKS while sustaining constant hits of that caliber.
still waiting for those sources. repeating yourself isn't going to make any difference.
Originally posted by Robtard
Another comparison. The Sun Crusher, one of the more powerful Star Wars weapons; which is supposed to be basically indestructible by conventional means survived a glancing hit from the Death Star.Yet an outdated Star Trek ship takes a full planet-busting hit and survives. Pretty telling.
😂 for real?
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Star Trek 2009 movie; the tranporters tranported a guy into that water tube.Star Wars: 200 trillion gigawatt reactor core
Star Trek: 15 billion gigawatt reactor core
the fact that you tried to use that just hurts your argument more and more.
Originally posted by -Pr-
still waiting for those sources. repeating yourself isn't going to make any difference.😂 for real?
the fact that you tried to use that just hurts your argument more and more.
Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
wow, just wow..star trek stomps...
not much in star wars universe that can win here
Star Wars: 200 trillion gigawatt reactor power
Star Trek: 15 billion gigawatt reactor power
Star Wars: 2.4 million megaton conventional weapons
Star Trek: 1160 megaton conventional weapons
Star Wars: can create black holes from a distance
Star Trek: zomg can destroy 4 light years of space, but has to deploy using ship
Star Wars: shields can withstand weeks of battle with 2.4 million megaton weapons
Star Trek: shields cannot withstand a ship ramming into it
Star Wars: ships often fight at thousands of miles away, and starfighters give star destroyers an "attack range" of lightyears
Star Trek: ships often fight within a kilometer of eachother.