Star Wars vs Star Trek, Lord of the Rings and Battlestar Galactica

Started by jaden10147 pages
Ever heard of a figure of speech?

Yes. Which it clearly isn't.

This isn't a contest of which franchise makes space battles look better.

It's not a battle of which franchise would win in a fight either because ST would rape SW without question. What's the line in War of the Worlds?...This isn't a war any more than there's a war between men and maggots...This is an extermination.

Those aren't turbolasers. Those are some sort of manned cannon looking like guns.

Are they indicative of SW's weak as piss firepower?...Yes.

And yet star destroyers were stated in some canon EU sources to be able to render a planet uninhabitable.

And they enterprise D's phaser destabilised a planet's techtonic plates BY ACCIDENT. The Borg have scooped entire civilizations from the surface of planets when assimilating them. And Species 8472's single manned bio ships destroyed a planet in a similar fashion to the death star.

That doesn't have to do with durability. Even if the star destroyer was somehow made out of glass a fighter of that size moving at that speed would not have caused an explosion that size without their having been some sort of explosives or other device on board, which it did (proton torpedos).

😆 😆 I love it when you just make stuff up in your head. It's highly amusing.

"A blog of matter" - you do realize that everything tangible that we know of is made out of matter, right?

And this has what to do with what we're discussing.

You started that debate, I'm not thinking that it's as important as you claim.

We're talking about a single molecule with more destructive power than anything that SW has...1 molecule.

They had encountered similar vessels.

No they hadn't...The events of Q-Who were the 1st time the Borg had encountered a Federation starship.

They can't adapt that quickly; they typically adapt after a battle not in the middle of it.

Clearly you don't any idea what you're talking about. The Enterprise begins to modulate their shields and phasers to different frequencies every few seconds...It took the Borg all of 30 seconds to adapt to both shields and weapons in the middle of a battle.

The ships only fire that fast when warp strafing, but note that they wouldn't actually significantly damage Star Wars star destroyers; 1160 megaton weapons would not do much damage to a shielded star destroyer that can withstand multiple 2.4 million megaton blasts.

Keep repeating your out-of-date figures from books. I'll go with the top tier on screen canon as evidence of weapon power.

Maybe the anti personnel and anti fighter laser cannons, but the heavier anti ship weapons can damage 70 trillion gigawatt shields.

You actually have to provide proof of that you know.

Rolling on to page 36, fan-troll consistently proved wrong and is still pulling arguments out of his colon. Awesome.

Originally posted by jaden101
Yes. Which it clearly isn't.

By that logic, I'll cite one of Han Solo's quotes from LOTF: Invincible. He stated that those Mandalorian starfighters could fly through supernovas.

It's not a battle of which franchise would win in a fight either because ST would rape SW without question. What's the line in War of the Worlds?...This isn't a war any more than there's a war between men and maggots...This is an extermination.

BTW, those aliens in War of the Worlds actually lost the war. 😉

The point is that you are trying to justify some weak point by saying that it was to make the show more entertaining, which is an out of universe explanation. I'm looking for an in universe explanation, which is that they have an effective range of only around 10 kilometers.

Are they indicative of SW's weak as piss firepower?...Yes.

Upon further confirmation, I have realized that those are actually the guns that were used that are supposed to have 2.4 million megaton payloads. Before you celebrate however, there are two explanations:

Out of universe: The same idea that you used; it would be confusing to the audience to see 2.4 million megaton weapons exploding, because doing that would fill the entire screen with explosions.

In universe: If, say, the Republic ship were to fire its guns at its maximum power, 2.4 million megatons would not only damage the Separatist ship but would also damage the Republic ship by pretty much as much, and I don't think the ship commander was suicidal. Also, the blast radius was so big (and they were pretty close to Coruscant, inside the atmosphere since the Separatist ship fell down upon losing) that it could have affected a large portion of Coruscant, killing lots of civilians.

I would request that you actually read these explanations and either concede or try and refute them instead of hand waving them away as "lame excuses" or something.

And they enterprise D's phaser destabilised a planet's techtonic plates BY ACCIDENT. The Borg have scooped entire civilizations from the surface of planets when assimilating them. And Species 8472's single manned bio ships destroyed a planet in a similar fashion to the death star.

And centerpoint station could create black holes.

😆 😆 I love it when you just make stuff up in your head. It's highly amusing.

Actually, it's true.

And this has what to do with what we're discussing.

You tried to brag about how the red matter was smaller and apparently somehow more advanced because of that by saying that it's a "blob of matter", which is a term that applies to almost everything.

BTW, red matter wouldn't be that useful in this hypothetical war. It took the ship a very long time to drill a hole and then put in the red matter, which still took time to take into effect. That ship got badly damaged by the older Enterprise ramming into it, so quite frankly the plan wouldn't work.

We're talking about a single molecule with more destructive power than anything that SW has...1 molecule.

Centerpoint station ftw

No they hadn't...The events of Q-Who were the 1st time the Borg had encountered a Federation starship.

True, but it still isn't plausible that a borg cube could somehow get close enough to a star destroyer to beam drones on there, and somehow the drones manage to get past the powerful security systems and armed crew.

Clearly you don't any idea what you're talking about. The Enterprise begins to modulate their shields and phasers to different frequencies every few seconds...It took the Borg all of 30 seconds to adapt to both shields and weapons in the middle of a battle.

Do you have an example of the borg adapting to anything other than phaser based weapons?

Keep repeating your out-of-date figures from books. I'll go with the top tier on screen canon as evidence of weapon power.

The clone wars reference guide isn't outdated, and the 1160 megaton figure was stated by you.

You actually have to provide proof of that you know.

Numerous sources say that laser cannons are ineffective against star destroyers, but there are sources showing that heavier weapons are effective.

BTW, what about:

Stealth X's
Those mandolorian starfighters (name starts with a b)
Centerpoint station
Jedi Order
Tractor beams
Crystal phase shifters
Sun Crusher
Galaxy Gun
Star Forge
This fission bomb mentioned (starts with a b) that had a blast radius of 500,000 km

I've had enough of this. The argument is lost, Hewhoknowsall, and your posts are becoming trolling rants. Don't do this again.

Since Hewhoknowsall is now perma banned, Rexxxx and I have decided to re-open the thread, since we are reasonably sure that the trolling will stop hence forth.

That is, unless HWKA decides to sock.

Had HWKA not been perma banned, this thread would have stayed locked, indefinitely.

Cool. It's a debate that will never end. Unfortunately there are sad fan boys on each side whose knowledge of the other faction is so dreadfully bad that no amount of actual on screen evidence will convince them that their beloved franchise characters would get raped in a fight.

I actually prefer SW to ST and have always made it clear that's the case. It's just plain and simple fact that ST has more ingenuity and scope in its writing to introduce new species and technology gradually as more and more of the galaxy was discovered by the Federation. That was the beauty of it. The fact that there was still loads of the galaxy to explore. SW had very little scope to expand in the same way that ST could.

"And so, the evil troll was defeated by the savior and peace restored to the forum. Whether the beast could return was up for debate, but the immediate threat was over. And everyone debated fairly and unrepeatedly. THE END"

Haha, someone had to do something about HWKA. I started posting on this thread with an open mind, until recently I thought it was a good thread and fun to debate on. HWKA just ruined the experience...not just repeating himself but completely ignoring posts that blew his stats and figures out of the water.

I know it's a given because that's trolling...but still, that was bad lol.

HWKA made a sock to speak positively about himself, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAHAHAHAHHA, can you get any more pathetic.

He'll be back soon enough.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Resistance is futile. Your life as it has been is over. From this time forward, you will service us."

Sincerely,

The Borg

Never has a point bin made with such epicness.

Originally posted by omgchos
Never has a point bin made with such epicness.

Who knew the Borg could be sincere lol

I have yet to read the entire thread but there are somethings I must go over now:

Originally posted by jaden101
Hmm..."stardestroyer.net"...I wonder if there's any bias in there at all?

Hmm… I wonder if you could actually refute what it says rather than dodging it by talking about how it much be biased. Every site of this type is going to have some bias, everyone has some bias; such as yourself.

Originally posted by jaden101
Not to mention with this 1st few sentences they limit it to "empire vs federation"...Given thaat the empire run their entire galaxy compared with the federations's non war making tiny fraction of their galaxy it's a bit pointless.

If you want to include ST's more aggressive species...the Borg and the Dominion/Jem Hadar then it's far more balanced.


Hardly balances it out given the vastly superior firepower and FTL speeds of Star Wars (I will go into more detail in later posts).

We take it from there. The Borg have far greater numbers....Stated as "billions of vessels containing trillions of drones" which is just the central nexus and doesn't include borg vessels outwith that small area. So potentiall hundreds of trillions of drones and hundreds of billions of ships.

And here is the real quote from “Unity“:

CHAKOTAY: Even if we do somehow negotiate an exchange, how long will they keep up their end of the bargain? It could take months to cross Borg territory. We'd be facing thousands of systems, millions of vessels.
JANEWAY: But only one Collective, and we've got them over a barrel. We don't need to give them a single bit of information, not until we're safe. We just need the courage to see this through to the end.
CHAKOTAY: There are other kinds of courage. Like the courage to accept that there are some situations beyond your control. Not every problem has an immediate solution.
JANEWAY: You're suggesting we turn around.

Now provide episode name and full quote for your claim to prove this one wrong.

Compare that with what's known about SW. Han says that it would take a thousand stardestroyers to cause the same damage that the death star caused. Implying that the empire doesn't have a thousand star destroyers. Take the events after epVI whereby in the Thrawn trilogy, just 500 old republic cruisers of the Katana fleet would swing the balance of power in the galaxy.

Who was clearly using Hyperbole. Or should we also take his claim that the Empire couldn’t mass scatter Alderaan as true? Also Specter of the Past (or Vision of the future forget which one) have now (Grand) Admiral Pellaon (sp?) remembering how the Empire at its height had 25,000 Imperial Star Destroyers. That is not counting the millions of smaller support vessels. The fact you think we should take Han at face value falls apart when we look at this logically:

1. Tarkin states the Empire has a million star systems. How can the Empire have maintained control, protected shipping from pirates and rebels etc.etc.etc. with less than a thousand ships?

2. The very existence of the Death Star blows the idea out of the water. If they have the industrial capacity to build two moon size battle stations in secret (20 years for the first Death Star and 4 years to 6 months to complete sixty percent of the Death Star 2) without it being found out they have the industrial capacity to build a fleet of millions. There is also the starship traffic above Coruscant and that is just the civilian vessels which by your claims would vastly outnumber the military.

3. And example of why we should not always take dialogue at face value: : / / w w w . y o u t u b e . c o m / w a t c h ?v = 3 J U 6 r G A Q 6 x A

54 Isotons (whatever the hell an Isoton is) is enough to destroy a small planet? And yet:

VOY's Living Witness where we get this dialogue on one of Voyagers photon torpedos:

QUARREN: The ensuing conflict was brief but brutal. Two million Kyrians slaughtered within days. The warship Voyager continued on its way, leaving the Kyrian dynasty in ruins. The Vaskan leaders proceeded to occupy our lands, forcing my people into subservience. It took centuries for us to undo the damage that Captain Janeway had done, and the Kyrian struggle for equality is far from over. This simulation and this museum are a testament to that struggle. I hope you found your experience here worthwhile. If you'd like to learn more about Voyager and its role in the history of our planet I suggest you explore the rest of this exhibit. Thank you for your time. Please, feel free to test the simulators. I wouldn't touch that if I were you. One of the Voyager's torpedoes. Twenty five isoton yield. It could destroy an entire city within seconds. It's been inactive for centuries but you never know. I'm only teasing, but, please, be careful. If we damage any of these relics they can never be replaced. The history of our people should be respected.

So should we take something that is said in the heat of a moment and therefore highly prone to hyperbole or take the one that doesn’t have a reason to be exaggerated and falls in line with standard Trek firepower?

Han said the Empire could not destroy an entire planet and was wrong: Check. Claimed that the Death Star could not have been artificial station built by the Empire: Check. Why should we trust him when he is wrong on two other accounts in that same scene?

Given that each Borg cube is large and more powerful than a standard stardestroyer...Then you have an empire that is outnumbered and outgunned by huge degrees.

Which you will now prove. Because until then no. The Star Wars Episode II Incredible Cross-Section book rates the Ventor class Star Destroyers peak power output at 3,6 × 1024 W or about 800 Teratons per second. Borg Cubes are at the best in the single digit Teraton range.

The Jem Hadar have similar numbers and are a far more aggressive race. Artificially bred solely for war. They have personal cloaking builit into their biology. They require no sleep, no rest, no food...They can fight continuously. They can also be artificially made to fighting level in 3 days.

And yet their vastly incompetent as seen in the Siege AR-558. They couldn’t remove the Feds who defenses after five or so months were less than a modern force could do today in several hours and the Jem Hadar simply charged at their position endlessly - why not use chemical warfare to take the Feds out? Or why don't any of them use the wide beam setting? The Empire is nowhere near the most competent sci fi ground force but their far above Star Trek. All it takes is taking out the drug they need and they die within the week.

ST has ablative armour technology which disapates energy based weapons rendering them useless. SW relies solely on energy based weapons.

No Limits Fallacy. Show the amount of firepower this armor can withstand.

In terms of weaponry, I showed, by canon sources, how a single photon torpedo is some 20+ times more powerful than the most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated on earth...the "tsar bomba". SW vessels have nothing as powerful.

Could you please point me to these sources? Because until then: BS. See below.

Rise : Inability to vaporize an abnormal asteroid. Photon Torpedo yields calced from these, assumed to be roughly a couple hundred megatons, high end.

Pegasus : Requires the entire loadout of a Federation Galaxy class ship (nearly 300) to destroy a 10 kilometer hollow asteroid per Riker.

First Contact : Inability for the Borg Sphere to destroy the Phoenix. Borg weapons are notably superior to their UFP counterparts, and if they had anything approaching Gigaton level weapons, then even if that sphere had less than one thousandth the offensive firepower of its main ship, the Phoenix and everyone around it should have still be a large smoldering expanse of radioactive waste with no more than several volleys from the micro-torpedoes fired.

The Dauphin : Riker states that a Terrawatt source is more power than the Enterprise D is capable of producing (However, we do later see evidence of this being not entirely correct. And is yet another reason why in most cases visuals should overrule dialogue).

Who Watches The Watchers : A phaser bank can be run byu a 4.2 Gigawatt reactor.

BOBW : LaForge states that the combined output of all the Enterprise's onboard weaponry is not as great as that of its warp core. Given that because of dangers presented by natural phenomena to the Enterprise (asteroid fields, smashing into dirt, etc, etc) that it can't be anywhere near the ability to take TT level weaponry to the chin and laugh it off (as would be required to not be getting anally violated by the Klingons and the Cardies).

Genesis : New and Improved Photon Torpedoes (tm) used by Worf prove to be barely capable of shattering asteroids not much bigger than themselves. This would indicate that they are incapable of breaking the megaton range (but I'm not an ass, and won't use that). Quote for this below:

Originally Posted by Worf
Our next test will involve the new photon torpedoes. The explosive yield has been increased by [B]eleven percent
... and I have enhanced the targeting systems for increased accuracy.

Insurrection : Two Son'A ships, who together can outfight the Enterprise-E, and take quantum torps without flinching, are destroyed by the chemical incendiary explosion that results from the detonation of 'Metrion Gas.' Chemical reactions of that nature are, compared to nuclear fission/fusion and M/AM reactions, absolutely pathetic. This would again indicate shielding and hull defenses that do not exceed the triple digit kiloton range.

Cont. next post.

Cont. from above:

Nemesis : Despite being at nearly full shields and possessing an undamaged hull, the Scimitar is utterly ravaged when the slow moving Enterprise E smashes into it. This is a KE event of, at most, 100 kilotons (assuming about 180 meter per second speed from the Enterprise, and that it masses at 25 million metric tons (which is probably way the hell too high, considering that Voyager masses at 700,000, and sure as hell is not 1/35th the size of the EntE))

Night Terrors : the Enterprise D's weapons cache is once again proven to be inferior to the chemical explosion of the volatile anicium and yurium components of a man's cargo.

Conundrum : Riker expresses his confidence in a PT's ability to penetrate and knock out a shield of 4.3 kilojoules in power. While at first, this may make you scratch your head at its relevance, if Torps had TT level power, they would exceed the power of the shield generators by about some twenty four orders of magnitude, likely taking the entire station with it (to put in perspective for you, 4.3 kilojoules is about the amount of energy expended by the average human walking up a flight of stairs, or a single shot from an AK-47, if they wanted the shields down, they could have simply had Data pop outside and punch it once or twice).

Cost of Living : Photon Torpedos fail utterly against a unusually dense asteroid.

Inheritance : Phasers specially modified for drilling (most focused possible) purposes take 5 seconds to carve out a hole of 7 meters in diameter to 2 kilometers deep. This is about 6,000 cubic meters. Assuming vaporization (which we know phasers do not do, they 'cheat' and get it done with less energy) and granite, that's about 45 kilotons.

Starship Down : The Defiant is struck by a Jem'Haddar torpedo, which fails to detonate. It instead becomes a KE penetrator device. The Torpedo is moving at a rate of about 100 meters a second when it impacts. Even assuming a mass of 4,000 kilograms (about 10,000 pounds, rather ridiculous considering that Quark was able to lift panels off the thing without effort) the energy does not exceed 20 megajoules. This means that the Defiant, with its uber ablative armor, the ship that has been demonstrated to survive punishment that rips GCSs to pieces, would be significantly threatened by modern tanks and seafaring vessels. Of course this is laughable and an outlier by ant stand really, but it helps to drive home that they do not have GT weapons as average.

There is also one other episode, whose name I cannot recall, that revolves around a Cardiassian super weapon called the Dreadnought, that mixes 1000 kilograms of M/AM to create a large explosion. This has a yield of about 43 gigatons, assuming 100% efficiency. That this earns it a super weapon title is telling given the Enterprise should have seven times that amount of firepower in Photon Torpedoes.

We've shown in the thread that ST ships are more manueverable at sub light speeds....We've shown they have a larger range (10 fold) than SW ships. We've shown that while hyperdrive is faster than warp drive....transwarp is WAY faster than hyperdrive.

RoTS: Palpatin’s shuttle covers the 43,000 light years from Coruscant to Mustafar in no more than 15 minutes to save Vader (given the extent of his external and the unknown but sure to be high internal damage and his location it could not have been longer, and IIRC Palpatin’s shuttle arrives shortly after Obi Wan leaves).

Try that site instead. [/B]

That site is just as bias if not more so than SDN. Take for example he once tired to tell the people in charge of SW and ST canon what their own canon policy was and they told him to **** off.

Originally posted by jaden101
[B]You never just misinterpreted the last part but the 2nd last part too. I didn't mean the ST universe spans a longer period. I mean that ST has been going since the 1960's and has had 5 different TV series with some 800 hour long episodes as well as 11 movies not to mention all the canon novels and games to draw upon in terms of technology that has been mentioned. SW has 6 movies, some 30 tv episodes, a fair few games and novels.

I’m sorry, what? Please provide the quote from Paramount that says Star Trek books and games are canon given Paula Block person who has licensing over Star Trek and what it publishes does not agree with this:

Frankly, I don’t really understand why there’s so much confusion between continuity and canon. I started working at Paramount while Gene Roddenberry was still alive, so you might say I got canon from the horse’s- er, Great Bird’s—mouth. Canon is what’s produced for the TV and Movie screens. Books aren’t. End of story. It’s my job to hold licensees like Pocket to that standard. Which is not to say that there haven’t been times when canon has contradicted itself—those darn producers and scriptwriters don’t always keep track of/remember/care about what’s come before. So things can get confusing. But books are never considered part of canon. The only reason Jeri Taylor’s books were considered quasi-canon for a while was because licensees really wanted some sort of background structure they could utilize for the Voyager characters (they find it hard to accept statements like “Well, they haven’t established that on the show yet ..”). So we (by this I mean VCP and folks in Rick Berman’s office, whom I consulted with) let them consider Jeri’s stuff quasi-canon. It didn’t seem to hurt anything.

Another thing that makes canon a little confusing. Gene R. himself had a habit of decanonizing things. He didn’t like the way the animated series turned out, so he proclaimed that it was NOT CANON. He also didn’t like a lot of the movies. So he didn’t much consider them canon either. And—okay, I’m really going to scare you with this one-after he got TNG going, he .. well .. he sort of decided that some of the Original Series wasn’t canon either. I had a discussion with him once, where I cited a couple things that were very clearly canon in the Original Series, and he told me that he didn’t think that way anymore, and that he now thought of TNG as canon wherever there was conflict between the two. He admitted it was revisionist thinking, but so be it.

That’s kind of like God telling you the stuff in that old bible .. well, he’s just not in to it anymore. (And please don’t take that as an invitation to starting a thread about the merits of the old testament vs. the new. Do that on another bbs.) Anyway, you can see why canon is such a difficult concept. But I always fall back on the first and original rule (call me a traditionalist)–what you see on the big and small screens is canon. Nothing else.[/QOUTE]

[QUOTE]There's also small but devestating technologies such as phased cloaks which allow ships to be undetectable and pass through energy shielding and even solid objects. Ships were shown in ST to be able to hide inside solid rock because of it.

Yes, the Phase Cloaks which were used in how many episodes before never being seen again? Two-three? Tech of the Week doesn't really count given the multiple in other episodes where it would have helped they have completely forgotten about it.

They've also applied the phasing technology to weapons and so have nuclear weapon equivalent torpedos that can pass straight through energy shielding.

And you will now prove this is now common place technology. Even so their not going to be doing much damage to War hulls (more details later).

They have ablative armour which is effectively impervious to energy weapons (rendering SW turbo lasers etc completely useless)

You have yet to quantify Ablative Armor. Until such a time as you quantify it it is a non-factor in the debate.

There's also the fact that ST has technology that can shield and cloak ENTIRE PLANETS.

And you will now show us this examples and how common they are.

Sorry for the triple posting, but upon reading farther into the thread I will now that Star Wars loses to Star Trek when taking into account everything in their canon across millions of years. There are still a few points though that need to be hammered out in this thread though such as number of Imperial starships and the MMK mine.

One discrepancy I see in your posts is the 15 minute travel from Coruscant to Mustafar. I don't think we're ever given an actual timeframe for that journey other than the necessary cinematic scene-to-scene transitions.

Star Trek still wins though. Time Cannon FTW.

oh dear ugh3ugh3ugh3

Triple face-palm? This is a bad thread to continue to post on...

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
One discrepancy I see in your posts is the 15 minute travel from Coruscant to Mustafar. I don't think we're ever given an actual timeframe for that journey other than the necessary cinematic scene-to-scene transitions.

True. I am giving it that amount of time simply because with the extent of Vader’s injuries he could not last long there. And as I said IIRC we see Palpatin landing not long after Obi Wan leaves and I doubt Obi Wan would spend that much time on Mustafar after taking down Vader.

Star Trek still wins though. Time Cannon FTW.

Yep, Star Trek wins with time travel.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
[B]oh dear ugh3ugh3ugh3

And may I ask what you find wrong with my posts? I'm always up to a debate or being corrected where I made a mistake. Or is it just because this thread is horrible? Because if that is it I agree with you given what I’ve read so far.

Originally posted by CadoAngelus
Triple face-palm? This is a bad thread to continue to post on...

yeah it was over a long time ago..

Originally posted by Commander E-178
True. I am giving it that amount of time simply because with the extent of Vader’s injuries he could not last long there. And as I said IIRC we see Palpatin landing not long after Obi Wan leaves and I doubt Obi Wan would spend that much time on Mustafar after taking down Vader.
Yeah that's what I mean, the scene transitions in a way as to leave we nitpickers wondering how long it took. The movie and novel give a good impression that the two duels were simultaneous, and hypersapce travel takes roughly a day to cross the entire galaxy (Mustafar being about half that length from Coruscant). It's likely that Vader was lieing there stewing in pain and hatred for a good little while.

Still though, crossing a galaxy in a day. On average, for any ship. For every ship. Trek can't match that.

Originally posted by Commander E-178
Yep, Star Trek wins with time travel.
*smacks*

Never. Question. The Time Gun.

But hey, Star Wars has time travel too.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Yeah that's what I mean, the scene transitions in a way as to leave we nitpickers wondering how long it took. The movie and novel give a good impression that the two duels were simultaneous, and hypersapce travel takes roughly a day to cross the entire galaxy (Mustafar being about half that length from Coruscant). It's likely that Vader was lieing there stewing in pain and hatred for a good little while.

Still though, crossing a galaxy in a day. On average, for any ship. For every ship. Trek can't match that.

*smacks*

Never. Question. The Time Gun.

But hey, Star Wars has time travel too.

What is the Time Gun/where do they have time travel in SW?