Originally posted by CadoAngelus
Vulcan's can still feel emotion - at times 😕 . Though it's hard to list another emotionless species from any other sci-fi franchise without thinking of Terminator, which would just be messy and would probably result in death or extreme mangling.
Data sans emotion-chip is emotionless and he's programmed to **** you proper 6-ways from Sunday. Just ask Tasha Yar.
Originally posted by KMCmember
Are you seriously this dense?The pointisn't that a star destroyer is more powerful than the Enterprise, it's that a star destroyer is [b]billions of times
more powerful than the Enterprise. If their technology level was equal, one would expect for the star destroyer to be more powerful by about a factor of 10 to 1000, but 1000000000? A car with a gun on it is not weaker than a tank by a factor of 1000000000.Besides, even a galaxy class starship (a high level by Star Trek standards) would need to fire hundreds of millions of times to get past a star destroyer. [/B]
Why are you still repeating this?....I've shown you figures from real life science that mean a mark II photon torpedo can give a yield of 650 gigatons...3 times that of your stated turbolasers.
Originally posted by jaden101
Except that I did...I even linked to the page.
Please cite it again.
Originally posted by Robtard
Besides being a raving Star Wars fan, he was a troll and it's possible he had some mental disability. Not sure if it was a Forrest Gump-esque mentality, Autism or other, but something wasn't Kosher in that cat's head.
You know, if he really did have a mental disability (which he obviously didn't) then he shouldn't have been banned nor should you have been so insensitive to make fun of him.
I have several aunts, and one of them is mentally disabled. Do we make fun of her? No, we take care of her, make sure she is healthy and try and make her life as good as possible.
Of course, you clearly aren't a good enough person to care.
Originally posted by KMCmember
You know, if he really did have a mental disability (which he obviously didn't) then he shouldn't have been banned nor should you have been so insensitive to make fun of him.I have several aunts, and one of them is mentally disabled. Do we make fun of her? No, we take care of her, make sure she is healthy and try and make her life as good as possible.
Of course, you clearly aren't a good enough person to care.
Being mental doesn't excuse intentional trolling, he was warned over and over and over.
Yeah, sure you do.
I'm even more convinced you are indeed HWKA. This wouldn't be the first time HWKA made a sock to speak positively about himself. Hilarious.
Originally posted by Robtard
Being mental doesn't excuse intentional trolling, he was warned over and over and over.Yeah, sure you do.
I'm even more convinced you are indeed HWKA. This wouldn't be the first time HWKA made a sock to speak positively about himself. Hilarious.
You really are sick and disgusting Robtard. If someone is mental (although we both know that hewhoknowsall wasn't mentally ill), you shouldn't make fun of them for that! Any decent human being would respect that.
And I do indeed have an aunt that's mentally ill, and when I'm near her I help her out and don't make fun of her like you think is the right thing to do to a helpless person.
Oh, and you accuse him for trolling, yet I would request that you show me ONE POST in which you have actually made an argument in the past 10 pages.
And no, me supporting him does not make me a sock. It makes me a decent, reasonable person that understands other people.
Back to the main argument of this thread, do you have anything constructive to say?
Originally posted by KMCmember
You really are sick and disgusting Robtard. If someone is mental (although we both know that hewhoknowsall wasn't mentally ill), [b]you shouldn't make fun of them for that! Any decent human being would respect that.And I do indeed have an aunt that's mentally ill, and when I'm near her I help her out and don't make fun of her like you think is the right thing to do to a helpless person.
Oh, and you accuse him for trolling, yet I would request that you show me ONE POST in which you have actually made an argument in the past 10 pages.
And no, me supporting him does not make me a sock. It makes me a decent, reasonable person that understands other people. [/B]
Strawman much? Calling him a troll because he was is not "making fun of him"
Though as I said, pretty sure you're HWKA, so I guess a 'welcome back, guy" is in order.
Go back 10 pages, I was talking about the power-levels of an old Constitution Class ship, as an example for Star Trek. HWKA/You trolled by making up facts about what happened in the TV series. Literally pulled them of his/your ass. Which was funny and sad.
Originally posted by Robtard
Strawman much? Calling him a troll because he was is not "making fun of him"Though as I said, pretty sure you're HWKA, so I guess a 'welcome back, guy" is in order.
Go back 10 pages, I was talking about the power-levels of an old Constitution Class ship, as an example for Star Trek. HWKA/You trolled by making up facts about what happened in the TV series. Literally pulled them of his/your ass. Which was funny and sad.
I saw that, and you're contradicting yourself. You made a bogus claim that the Enterprise could take a planet buster and was thus superior to a star destroyer, but your counter to my mathematical proof that a star destroyer is superior to the Enterprise is that the Enterprise isn't a warship and thus it isn't fair.
See how you constantly change your argument using bogus evidence and a limited understanding of mathematics and science?
Ah, more nonsense from you, is to be expected. I showed that a 22nd century Constitution Class could/did survive an attack powerful enough to destroy a planet, as a show of power levels.
I didn't counter your numbers, as they're skewed/incorrect; you simply refuse to acknowledge this. Jaden showed you; you play the dummy by asking him to re-post, even though it's in the previous page.
I noted that you keep bringing in the Enterprise D as some standard of power for Star Trek, like it's the best there is to offer from Star Trek. Your skewed numbers for it are a separate (and funnier) issue.
Keep trolling HWKA and talking apositively about yourself, that's always funny to read.
Originally posted by Robtard
Ah, more nonsense from you, is to be expected. I showed that a 22nd century Constitution Class could/did survive an attack powerful enough to destroy a planet, as a show of power levels.
Yet you twisted it. The "doomsday machine" cut a planet into pieces using an anti photon beam. Such a technique would not be as destructive against a shielded ship due to the nature of the attack.
I didn't counter your numbers, as they're skewed/incorrect; you simply refuse to acknowledge this. Jaden showed you; you play the dummy by asking him to re-post, even though it's in the previous page.
BS. You didn't attempt to refute the validity of the calculations until Jaden101, the only one on your side that seems to have some sort of debating skills, does, and then you say "oh see Jaden101 prove you wrong!!!!".
See? You haven't contributed anything original to this argument.
I noted that you keep bringing in the Enterprise D as some standard of power for Star Trek, like it's the best there is to offer from Star Trek. Your skewed numbers for it are a separate (and funnier) issue.
How many times do I need to explain to you this? I did not claim that the Enterprise D was the standard of power for Star Trek, THAT ISN'T THE POINT. Read my recent posts again.
I stated this several times, and you'd actually quote my posts...and then completely ignore them.
Keep trolling HWKA and talking apositively about yourself, that's always funny to read.
Trolling?
I'll give you a challenge, if you can:
Aside from the doomsday machine claim, show me ONE instant in which you made an argument that hadn't already been made by Jaden101 or someone else.
Originally posted by Robtard
^Maybe you should pose that challenge to yourself, considering your argument is based on flawed ST numbers, which was tried in here before. (you won't)
Live long and prosper; may the force be with you, HWKA.
P.S. The Kremin Time-Weapon still goes unchallenged.
You still haven't stated anything other than that twisted "doomsday machine" argument that somebody else in this thread didn't already stated.