Superman vs Thanos

Originally posted by quanchi112
Strength feats don't prove anything really on there own unless both combatants attempt them.

Thanos has held his own against Thor with the power gem who was getting stronger with each passing second. Thanos has overpowered the Hulk and the Thing at the same time.

What do you mean by level 1 disintegration beams?

If it's non canon it cannot be used on the board hence it's useless.

The oe really hasn't eliminated anyone above top tier to my knowledge so....

What proof do you have that it would eliminate Thanos?

No, I am pretty sure you argued the hammer wasn't magical.

Now if we assume that for each passing second Thor's strength was increasing in that fight (not just in the bubble) then we still don't know how much it was increasing. We can only go on evidence of the fight to say how much stronger Thor was getting. And by the fight it seems Thor was no stronger. A normal Thor could have knocked Thanos around like that. Hell current Thor knocked his uncle to space with one blow.

I brung up the non canon feat because of writers opinion of Superman. But it don't have to be accepted because of the rules.
I see this as a lawyer giving inadmissible evidence in court. But since the jury already saw it then it is too late to retract it. The damage has been done and it will be used to help form an opinion on the case. So since we know what the writer thinks of Superman then it's too late.

Strength feats prove who is stronger. Nearly every class 100 character has shown no limit to their strength yet. But we still classify which one is stronger than the other. How? By strength feats of course. Why do you think the majority think Superman is stronger than Thor?

The OE can and will eliminate all beings who are not essential to reality. This evidence is provided by comics as well as the power being from the source. The source>>>>>>>>Thanos.

If I overpower your thumb with my entire hand does that mean I'm stronger than you? No it doesn't. The thumb is the weakest part of the arm. Thanos overpowered Hulk's neck muscles with thanos's own arms and chest muscles (a huge mismatch).

Also any feat against a character of variable strength is void since we don't know at what strength level that variable character was operating at in that particular moment in time.

And I argued that the Godblast wasn't magical. You are confusing me with someone else. The hammer is made out of plain Uru with enchantments on it (magic).

prove doomsday is stronger than superman please.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
prove doomsday is stronger than superman please.

HP DD prey overpowered a Superman who had the strength to knock a 1600lb being through a spaceship in space. DD went through probes like tissue paper where OWAW Superman (arguably the strongest normal Superman) couldn't put a scratch on them after great effort. Superman managed to destroy one after much much effort though. But the effortlessness of the way DD did proves he is stronger.

No it actually proves Jack.

Funny how you'll point out that thanos v Thor or any other characters strength feats does nit prove their strength but doomsday v superman it's allowable
flmao.

Originally posted by rotiart
Funny how you'll point out that thanos v Thor or any other characters strength feats does nit prove their strength but doomsday v superman it's allowable
flmao.

I apologize for not being clear. When I say overpowered I'm referring to when the characters are grappled up (like arm wrestling) and one character physically overpowers the strength of another by moving against that characters strength (like winning in arm wrestling). Thor and Thanos was never grappled up, Superman and DD was.

Originally posted by h1a8
DOS DD overpowered a weaker Superman so he is stronger than that Superman.

HP DD prey overpowered a Superman who had the strength to knock a 1600lb being through a spaceship in space. DD went through probes like tissue paper where OWAW Superman (arguably the strongest normal Superman) couldn't put a scratch on them after great effort. Superman managed to destroy one after much much effort though. But the effortlessness of the way DD did proves he is stronger.

and karate kid could handle pre-crisis superboy, and thanos handled thor and hulk with ease without using any overt skill ....all very confusing.....

we need your physics skills to make sense of all of this.

Originally posted by h1a8
Let me see, Thanos gets hit by Thor and Thanos hits Thor. I fail to see how that says he is as strong as Thor. Especially assuming that Thanos durability level is generally higher than his strength level.

Now if we assume that for each passing second Thor's strength was increasing in that fight (not just in the bubble) then we still don't know how much it was increasing. We can only go on evidence of the fight to say how much stronger Thor was getting. And by the fight it seems Thor was no stronger. A normal Thor could have knocked Thanos around like that. Hell current Thor knocked his uncle to space with one blow.

I brung up the non canon feat because of writers opinion of Superman. But it don't have to be accepted because of the rules.
I see this as a lawyer giving inadmissible evidence in court. But since the jury already saw it then it is too late to retract it. The damage has been done and it will be used to help form an opinion on the case. So since we know what the writer thinks of Superman then it's too late.

Strength feats prove who is stronger. Nearly every class 100 character has shown no limit to their strength yet. But we still classify which one is stronger than the other. How? By strength feats of course. Why do you think the majority think Superman is stronger than ThorStrength feats prove who is stronger. Nearly every class 100 character has shown no limit to their strength yet. But we still classify which one is stronger than the other. How? By strength feats of course. Why do you think the majority think Superman is stronger ?

The OE can and will eliminate all beings who are not essential to reality. This evidence is provided by comics as well as the power being from the source. The source>>>>>>>>Thanos.

If I overpower your thumb with my entire hand does that mean I'm stronger than you? No it doesn't. The thumb is the weakest part of the arm. Thanos overpowered Hulk's neck muscles with thanos's own arms and chest muscles (a huge mismatch).

Also any feat against a character of variable strength is void since we don't know at what strength level that variable character was operating at in that particular moment in time.

And I argued that the Godblast wasn't magical. You are confusing me with someone else. The hammer is made out of plain Uru with enchantments on it (magic).

Thanos handled WM thor with the PG supes is not doing this, supes would have issues with just thor alone. Unless thor fights like a retard.......

this is not even debatable thanos 10/10

Originally posted by psycho gundam
but did he ever lift anything? 😕

and karate kid could handle pre-crisis superboy, and thanos handled thor and hulk with ease without using any overt skill ....all very confusing.....

we need your physics skills to make sense of all of this.

supes is not handling thor and hulk with ease..........

The Mad Titan

Originally posted by zeel
Thanos handled WM thor with the PG supes is not doing this, supes would have issues with just thor alone. Unless thor fights like a retard.......

this is not even debatable thanos 10/10

Thanos...come on....

Originally posted by h1a8
Let me see, Thanos gets hit by Thor and Thanos hits Thor. I fail to see how that says he is as strong as Thor. Especially assuming that Thanos durability level is generally higher than his strength level.

Now if we assume that for each passing second Thor's strength was increasing in that fight (not just in the bubble) then we still don't know how much it was increasing. We can only go on evidence of the fight to say how much stronger Thor was getting. And by the fight it seems Thor was no stronger. A normal Thor could have knocked Thanos around like that. Hell current Thor knocked his uncle to space with one blow.

I brung up the non canon feat because of writers opinion of Superman. But it don't have to be accepted because of the rules.
I see this as a lawyer giving inadmissible evidence in court. But since the jury already saw it then it is too late to retract it. The damage has been done and it will be used to help form an opinion on the case. So since we know what the writer thinks of Superman then it's too late.

Strength feats prove who is stronger. Nearly every class 100 character has shown no limit to their strength yet. But we still classify which one is stronger than the other. How? By strength feats of course. Why do you think the majority think Superman is stronger than Thor?

The OE can and will eliminate all beings who are not essential to reality. This evidence is provided by comics as well as the power being from the source. The source>>>>>>>>Thanos.

If I overpower your thumb with my entire hand does that mean I'm stronger than you? No it doesn't. The thumb is the weakest part of the arm. Thanos overpowered Hulk's neck muscles with thanos's own arms and chest muscles (a huge mismatch).

Also any feat against a character of variable strength is void since we don't know at what strength level that variable character was operating at in that particular moment in time.

And I argued that the Godblast wasn't magical. You are confusing me with someone else. The hammer is made out of plain Uru with enchantments on it (magic).

Thanos has fought a normal Thor before when Thanos was weaker against the Thing as well. Thor didn't beat him then. I already posted scans of Thor needing all kinds of goodies to beat a Thanos clone.

Do you live in your own little world?

It's inadmissible and there isn't a jury. No one even knows what you are talking about half the time so I don't think you'd win a single case as you demonstrate unparalled ignorance from thread to thread.

Because Superman appeared stronger in the avengers crossover. Feats don't prove he is stronger than Thor. You can make a case they are equals to boot or Supes durability is greater.

Who has it eliminated? Darkseid isn't the source. The source has nothing to do with Thanos taking on darkseid. You are out of your depth yet again.

Thanos proved his superiority to the Hulk by his strength alone. No surprise here you come with your complete lack of common sense saying it doesn't count again.

No, it was you.

facepalm

Thor isn't stronger than Thanos. That's just stupid.

Of course there isn't a lot of showings to prove Thanos' strength without energy amp etc.

I'd be hard pressed to say Thanos is 50% stronger than Thor though.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
facepalm

Thor isn't stronger than Thanos. That's just stupid.

Of course there isn't a lot of showings to prove Thanos' strength without energy amp etc.

I'd be hard pressed to say Thanos is 50% stronger than Thor though.

Thanos also has incredible striking power, that's his thing.

There's a lot of skill behind those punches.

Punching power =/= physical strength all the time.
Look at Bruce Lee, he hit harder than most strong men who could lift three to three four times what he lifted because of his skill.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Punching power =/= physical strength all the time.
Look at Bruce Lee, he hit harder than most strong men who could lift three to three four times what he lifted because of his skill.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not always. I bet Mike Tyson's punches hurt a lot more in his prime than Jay Cutler's.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Jay Cutler the football player or the body builder?