Superman's Hardest Punch vs Thor's Hardest Mjolnir Slam

Started by jrodslam50 pages

If in that scan above is a planet, that has to be the smallest planet ever.

Originally posted by jrodslam
If in that scan above is a planet, that has to be the smallest planet ever.

Read the comic.

You can see that it's much greater in the earlier pages.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Read the comic.

You can see that it's much greater in the earlier pages.

well it doesn't look bigger than a house

Originally posted by h1a8
The bottom line is if Thor would have struck anything else non magical with the same force then nothing would have happened. Not even 1 billionth of what happened. Thus the feat is invalid. Superman's feat had no plot devices.
You chirped Thor hasn't destroyed a planet on panel. When has Superman? You going to keep making claims and touting these double standards throughout all of these threads? It's rather pathetic.

Originally posted by Starscream M
well it doesn't look bigger than a house

Even going from that particular scan, that would be one gigantic house.

In the earlier scans, it just looks like their on the surface of an earth-like planet. It got shrunk to show the totality of the destruction (Somewhat similar to that grey hulk feat).

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Funny, because Beta Ray Bill's Stombreaker has destroyed planets on-panel. Not sure why you would think Mjolnir would be weaker. And let's not conflate what Thor has actually done with what other Thor facsimiles have done. Fact is, you don't think Thor w/ Mjolnir could destroy a planet. Assuming that you completely ignore Stormbreaker's feats, then posit a feat by Superman that surpasses the Thor feat that was posted in this thread. Otherwise, your protestations are purely rhetorical.

What? No you didn't understand. Destroying a planet isn't even an atom compared to sending shockwaves throughout the cosmos. I didn't claim Thor couldn't destroy a planet with Mjolnir. I'm saying that the feat with Masterson is invalid as for proof of Thor's hitting power.

Now BRB and Thor can destroy only moon sized planets at most. Something the size of the Earth is a no go.

Originally posted by King Kandy
It's mass was equal to the Earth's, as it displayed the same gravitational effects on the fighters as the Earth does.
All planets will show the same gravitational effects as Earth (even in comics). You don't see DD moon stepping on the moon do you? No. He moves and fights as if he is on Earth.

I'd say a hammer hits harder than a fist, assuming the two have equal strength (just bear with me guys) the hammer's leverage will mean that Thor's hardest slam is much more powerful than Superman's strongest punch excepting if Superman is allowed to run or fly to gain momentum. That's all I'm saying on the matter. I feel dirty even posting in a Thor vs Superman thread.

Originally posted by h1a8
All planets will show the same gravitational effects as Earth (even in comics). You don't see DD moon stepping on the moon do you? No. He moves and fights as if he is on Earth.

You're the one who said that comics have to comply with Newton's laws. You change your own debating rules depending on the situation.

By the logic you're using, you could say the Earth was tiny when Thor pulled the serpent off of it (since the boat looked gigantic in comparison). But no, anybody with reasonable intelligence can see that it's just artistic license.

Especially because that little chunk Thor's standing on in that scan? Next issue it was drawn as being the size of a massive battlefield.

h1a8 can dig ditches with the best of them.

Originally posted by h1a8
What? No you didn't understand. Destroying a planet isn't even an atom compared to sending shockwaves throughout the cosmos. I didn't claim Thor couldn't destroy a planet with Mjolnir. I'm saying that the feat with Masterson is invalid as for proof of Thor's hitting power.

Now BRB and Thor can destroy only moon sized planets at most. Something the size of the Earth is a no go.

How are they invalid?

Originally posted by h1a8
What? No you didn't understand. Destroying a planet isn't even an atom compared to sending shockwaves throughout the cosmos. I didn't claim Thor couldn't destroy a planet with Mjolnir. I'm saying that the feat with Masterson is invalid as for proof of Thor's hitting power.

Now BRB and Thor can destroy only moon sized planets at most. Something the size of the Earth is a no go.

No, I understood perfectly. In attempting to debunk the Masterson/Dargo feat, you suggested that the presence of two Mjolnir's completely discredits the power within a single Mjolnir. Except you still haven't shown a single feat of Superman's that surpasses a Mjolnir feat performed in isolation.

You're wrong. Read Stormbreaker - The Saga of Beta Ray Bill. And it still doesn't matter since you've not shown that Superman could do any better. So you're spewing rheteoric for no reason at all.

Originally posted by h1a8
I didn't claim Thor couldn't destroy a planet with Mjolnir.

Now BRB and Thor can destroy only moon sized planets at most. Something the size of the Earth is a no go.

sure you did, you even claimed repeatedly that thor couldn't even destroy a mountain even though the scan of him damaging mountain ranges and the planet shivering from indirect contact was right there....

how do you stay invisible to the mods?

Originally posted by psycho gundam
sure you did, you even claimed repeatedly that thor couldn't even destroy a mountain even though the scan of him damaging mountain ranges and the planet shivering from indirect contact was right there....

how do you stay invisible to the mods?

he's not invisible, and such comments are hardly constructive.

Originally posted by Starscream M
Which is more powerful?
Originally posted by Parmaniac
Batkick, even if it's not stated, it breaks through threadbarriers and wins the contest
Good post. 👆

You are now off "The List". 😛

Does Thor get a chance to spin up Mjolnir or is it just a "sledgehammer" shot?

I would say w/o any spinning, that Mjolnir and Thor's punch would be pretty close to Supes punch. With spinning, Mjolnir should be more powerful than both.

Originally posted by -Pr-
he's not invisible, and such comments are hardly constructive.
nono

Originally posted by h1a8
The bottom line is...

...that you don't know what you're talking about... :-/

Originally posted by h1a8
if Thor would have struck anything else non magical with the same force then nothing would have happened. Not even 1 billionth of what happened. Thus the feat is invalid.

See? Now you're using the same reasoning that you kept arguing against in the Mangog vs Superman thread. Double standards much?

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman's feat had no plot devices.

If you're talking about the reality rending punches feat, if you've been reading up, it is quite rife with plot devices. Yet another one of your double standards, it seems...

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Thor's Mjolnir Slam > Superman's Punch > Thor's Punch

this would be my guess, probably. either way, there's not going to be a whole lot of difference in the 3 of them imo...

i'd add superman's flying punch/tackle too, tbh, if for nothing else than the fact that he uses it so often...

Originally posted by -Pr-
this would be my guess, probably. either way, there's not going to be a whole lot of difference in the 3 of them imo...

i'd add superman's flying punch/tackle too, tbh, if for nothing else than the fact that he uses it so often...

that should count, superman flying into something with his fists out is kind of a punch. he has that feat where he flew into that planet 99% lightspeed.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
that should count, superman flying into something with his fists out is kind of a punch. he has that feat where he flew into that planet 99% lightspeed.

and when he fought gog. i think there's a darkseid one too. and a doomsday one. when he fought that guy that had been changed by gog too.

it's pretty common, so i agree, it should count.