HP Doomsday vs Thanos Fist fight

Originally posted by h1a8
SS, the being with FTL reflexes and super speed, couldn't even hit a floating still Thor in space without his hammer. That is the dumbest thing ever.

Thor would have won if thanos didn't cheat, thus Thor was stronger by your logic. By my logic, a brawl doesn't quite show who's the stronger. Thor's strength is dynamic and increases due to his distress. I assure you Thor fighting the celestials in the end seems far stronger than PG Thor.

And I agree 100% that if Thano's overpowers Gladiator or Thor then he is stronger. If you so gladly show this then the argument will be over. I'll except any wrestling feats, punching feats, lifting feats, etc.

How do you know Thor is stronger just because he fought the celestials? His strength doesn't increase like when he fought Thanos with the power gem he is strong enough to do that kind of damage normally but with the power gem he was an absolute monster.

Thanos overpowered the Hulk and the Thing. Done. Thor has been Hulk's equal until the Hulk gets really angry yet Thanos pwned both he and the Thing.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Iyo. They have fought before and even the Surfer admitted Thor's the more powerful of the two. Thor has been written better than blood and thunder although it was a very high showing for him imo.

How do you know Thor is stronger just because he fought the celestials? His strength doesn't increase like when he fought Thanos with the power gem he is strong enough to do that kind of damage normally but with the power gem he was an absolute monster.

Thanos overpowered the Hulk and the Thing. Done. Thor has been Hulk's equal until the Hulk gets really angry yet Thanos pwned both he and the Thing.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't care what SS said. He fought stupidly and thus the fight is invalid.
He seemed stronger, which is all that matters since these characters don't exist. Lifting the Odinsword and throwing it inside a celestial, taking some of the celestials blasts, etc. The power gem amped Thor an unknown amount (if any). So that fight can't be used as evidence to show Thanos being stronger than normal Thor.
Hulk cannot be used as evidence because his strength is variable. Hulk's strength can range from 100 tons to whatever. Thor could have fought a 10,000 ton Hulk and Thanos a 500 ton Hulk. So that kills that weak argument.

How can't it? He was fighting an amped Thor meaning he was stronger than he was at his normal base. If you want to prove he was holding back then please do so otherwise it's just a waste of time on your part. It's also moronic and it shows you didn't read the actual story you read over a few scans.

Your assessments again make no sense. Thanos took on an amped Thor while normal Thor has matched Hulk. Thanos has easily overpowered Hulk to boot. Your arguments aren't even arguments imo.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Iyo he fought stupidly. You cannot rule out any old fight you don't disagree with and Surfer agreed prior to this fight that Thor was more powerful. Comics>your ignorant assumptions and theories.

How can't it? He was fighting an amped Thor meaning he was stronger than he was at his normal base. If you want to prove he was holding back then please do so otherwise it's just a waste of time on your part. It's also moronic and it shows you didn't read the actual story you read over a few scans.

Your assessments again make no sense. Thanos took on an amped Thor while normal Thor has matched Hulk. Thanos has easily overpowered Hulk to boot. Your arguments aren't even arguments imo.

I'm not falling for your tricks dude. You ignore the argument and restate yours in different words as a way to seemingly defeat my argument. The facts are restated:

I don't care what SS said. He fought stupidly and thus the fight is invalid. Feats, powers, and showings> character words (although they both occur in comics).

He seemed stronger, which is all that matters since these characters don't exist. Lifting the Odinsword and throwing it inside a celestial, taking some of the celestials blasts, etc. The power gem amped Thor an unknown amount (if any). So that fight can't be used as evidence to show Thanos being stronger than normal Thor

Ok I give PG Thor 2 tons of extra strength. Prove me wrong.

Hulk cannot be used as evidence because his strength is variable. Hulk's strength can range from 100 tons to whatever. Thor could have fought a 10,000 ton Hulk and Thanos a 500 ton Hulk. So that kills that weak argument.

Thor matched a 1000ton Hulk and Thanos overpowered a 500 ton Hulk and since Thanos match a 2 ton stronger Thor (1002 tons) than means he is a 1002 tonner. Prove me wrong.

Originally posted by h1a8
I'm not falling for your tricks dude. You ignore the argument and restate yours in different words as a way to seemingly defeat my argument. The facts are restated:

[b]I don't care what SS said. He fought stupidly and thus the fight is invalid. Feats, powers, and showings> character words (although they both occur in comics).

He seemed stronger, which is all that matters since these characters don't exist. Lifting the Odinsword and throwing it inside a celestial, taking some of the celestials blasts, etc. The power gem amped Thor an unknown amount (if any). So that fight can't be used as evidence to show Thanos being stronger than normal Thor

Ok I give PG Thor 2 tons of extra strength. Prove me wrong.

Hulk cannot be used as evidence because his strength is variable. Hulk's strength can range from 100 tons to whatever. Thor could have fought a 10,000 ton Hulk and Thanos a 500 ton Hulk. So that kills that weak argument.

Thor matched a 1000ton Hulk and Thanos overpowered a 500 ton Hulk and since Thanos match a 2 ton stronger Thor (1002 tons) than means he is a 1002 tonner. Prove me wrong. [/B]

Originally posted by quanchi112
Iyo. They have fought before and even the Surfer admitted Thor's the more powerful of the two. Thor has been written better than blood and thunder although it was a very high showing for him imo.

How do you know Thor is stronger just because he fought the celestials? His strength doesn't increase like when he fought Thanos with the power gem he is strong enough to do that kind of damage normally but with the power gem he was an absolute monster.

Thanos overpowered the Hulk and the Thing. Done. Thor has been Hulk's equal until the Hulk gets really angry yet Thanos pwned both he and the Thing.

I cant believe this is still going on 🤨

I can't either HP wrecks Thanos in a fist fight especially if he can't amp.

Originally posted by h1a8
I'm not falling for your tricks dude. You ignore the argument and restate yours in different words as a way to seemingly defeat my argument. The facts are restated:

[b]I don't care what SS said. He fought stupidly and thus the fight is invalid. Feats, powers, and showings> character words (although they both occur in comics).

He seemed stronger, which is all that matters since these characters don't exist. Lifting the Odinsword and throwing it inside a celestial, taking some of the celestials blasts, etc. The power gem amped Thor an unknown amount (if any). So that fight can't be used as evidence to show Thanos being stronger than normal Thor

Ok I give PG Thor 2 tons of extra strength. Prove me wrong.

Hulk cannot be used as evidence because his strength is variable. Hulk's strength can range from 100 tons to whatever. Thor could have fought a 10,000 ton Hulk and Thanos a 500 ton Hulk. So that kills that weak argument.

Thor matched a 1000ton Hulk and Thanos overpowered a 500 ton Hulk and since Thanos match a 2 ton stronger Thor (1002 tons) than means he is a 1002 tonner. Prove me wrong. [/B]

Wait a minute, did you just say he seemed stronger? What the hell? That means just because he had a big sword in front of him to throw he was stronger because one wasn't present in the blood and thunder storyline? Hahahahahahahahahaha. Your logic isn't logic it's one insane statement to the next. You don't make any sense and really shouldn't post you should try to soak in all the info you can get.

Prove what wrong? I don't care to go around disproving your negative statement. He was stronger than he is normally and that includes his odinsword feat. LOL.

Hulk is a strong character no matter what and Thanos easily overpowered him and a partner. he also took on a stronger Thor. You don't make sense now nor did you five posts ago.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Surfer never said that Thor was more powerful than he...

Originally posted by iceman24567
I can't either HP wrecks Thanos in a fist fight especially if he can't amp.

Thanos wins this almost every time. Thanos is on a entirely different level.

Originally posted by carver9
Thanos wins this almost every time. Thanos is on a entirely different level.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Not in terms of pure h/h he isn't.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Not in terms of pure h/h he isn't.

I think that he is in terms of H2H. Doomsday is on Superman level of strength whereas Thanos CRUSH people that is on the same level of strength as Superman with physical might.

They are in two different leagues physically.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Not in terms of pure h/h he isn't.

Originally posted by iceman24567
👆 DD has this in the bag easily in h2h

Originally posted by carver9
I think that he is in terms of H2H. Doomsday is on Superman level of strength whereas Thanos CRUSH people that is on the same level of strength as Superman with physical might.

They are in two different leagues physically.

HP DD is beyond Superman in strength, as shown when he easily overpowered him. Thanos never physically crushed anyone on the same strength level as Superman. If he did then you would have a small point. But he didn't.

Originally posted by h1a8
HP DD is beyond Superman in strength, as shown when he easily overpowered him. Thanos never physically crushed anyone on the same strength level as Superman. If he did then you would have a small point. But he didn't.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That was a weaker, psychologically scared superman. That's a pathetic point and actually when you look at the context it isn't impressive by any means.

That Superman was weaker than current Superman but still far far stronger than DOS Superman. Also that Superman was far more durable than most (if not all) top tiers in Marvel today. Yet HP went through him like a water balloon.

Originally posted by h1a8
That Superman was weaker than current Superman but still far far stronger than DOS Superman. Also that Superman was far more durable than most (if not all) top tiers in Marvel today. Yet HP went through him like a water balloon.

Originally posted by h1a8
HP DD is beyond Superman in strength, as shown when he easily overpowered him. Thanos never physically crushed anyone on the same strength level as Superman. If he did then you would have a small point. But he didn't.