Originally posted by inimalist
dependsmost Islamic philosophers who speak of Pan-Arabism or Arab Nationalism, both of which are hugely popular in the Middle East, speak of an Arab right as the true Muslims.
Its complex, and even Qutb, the philosophical father of modern Jihad, didn't tie the race and religion to each other in an "arab=muslim" sense, though he did speak of the privilege of Muslims being Allah's chosen people to receive the revelations of Mohamed.
I don't think Pan Arabism is that popular with the actual populations. Sure there are people who will argue they're ''Arabs'' outside of Arabian Peninsula, but many of those who do speak Arabic would insist they're Lebanese or Syrian, or Egyptian, not ''Arab''...in my experience.
Those arguments, (again, in my experience) are mostly heard by Palestinians and actual Arabs fromArabian Peninsula.
I am yet to hear Iraqi or Syrian or Lebanese to call themselves Arabs.
Those who know their history would fiercely argue against any such claim of ''arabism''.
Although I do not doubt there are people who feel like such.
Not to mention that tying Islam to a race (ie ''Arab'' even though they're in race terms Caucasians, but never mind), excludes, Iranians, Indonesians (Indonesia being the largest Muslim country in the world), Turks, Kurds, Malaysians, Pakistanis, Somalis...etc.
I do not believe Islam can be tied to a race, just like Christianity cannot. And if we include Beta Israel, neither can Judaism.