Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
OK then, glad we agree.
On second thought, Tyson's documentary is a movie, ergo, the footage of his younger self (prime Tyson) steam-rolling through professional heavyweight after professional heavyweight would be valid screen feats in here.
So Tyson does win, over the Pikey.
Originally posted by RobtardToo bad this about the Tyson movie with Michael Jai White, innit? Too bad the Pikey would stomp that Tyson, eh? Hmm?
On second thought, Tyson's documentary is a movie, ergo, the footage of his younger self (prime Tyson) steam-rolling through professional heavyweight after professional heavyweight would be valid screen feats in here.So Tyson does win, over the Pikey.
Attaboy, documentary FTW haermm
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Too bad this about the Tyson movie with Michael Jai White, innit? Too bad the Pikey would stomp that Tyson, eh? Hmm?Attaboy, documentary FTW haermm
It's a movie about the very same character, Mike Tyson, so why wouldn't those feats count?
Kinda funny that you insisted the Riddick cartoon count, even though that Riddick character is completely different and extremely fantasized compared to his live-action counterpart.
Are we being a hypocrite again and picking-choosing when something counts and doesn't?
Originally posted by RobtardBecause, Rob, the thread starter is to declare which movie versions are applicable. I posted the link to the Tyson movie, so I thought it was obvious that was the Tyson we used. If I had wanted to include real life Tyson, I would have said so. But that would be breaking MVF rules, yes?
It's a movie about the very same character, Mike Tyson, so why wouldn't those feats count?Kinda funny that you insisted the Riddick cartoon count, even though that Riddick character is completely different and extremely fantasized compared to his live-action counterpart.
Are we being a hypocrite again and picking-choosing when something counts and doesn't?
The Riddick thread? I started that thread, so I included ALL movie versions of Riddick. My choice.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Because, Rob, the thread starter is to declare which movie versions are applicable. I posted the link to the Tyson movie, so I thought it was obvious that was the Tyson we used. If I had wanted to include real life Tyson, I would have said so. But that would be breaking MVF rules, yes?The Riddick thread? I started that thread, so I included ALL movie versions of Riddick. My choice.
Opening thread just states "Mike Tyson", that means any movie with Mike Tyson [the boxer] is applicable, under the same terms you tried to pull in the Riddick Vs Preston thread. If you want to backpedal now, so be it.
Didn't Dadudemon do the 'Riddick Vs Preston' thread? I think so, son, I think so.
Originally posted by RobtardRob.....I posted a link to the Tyson movie, that's the one we use, it's pretty cut and dry.
Opening thread just states "Mike Tyson", that means any movie with Mike Tyson [the boxer] is applicable, under the same terms you tried to pull in the Riddick Vs Preston thread. If you want to backpedal now, so be it.Didn't Dadudemon do the 'Riddick Vs Preston' thread? I think so, son, I think so.
Pretty sure I started it.
Edit, just checked, DDM did start it. But we had the debate whether to include Dark Fury Riddick, he approved, Impediment approved, so there you go.
Here's your opening post; there's no link, son. Only says "Mike Tyson".
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Two scenarios:Scenario one: Regulated boxing match, 10 rounds.
Scenario two: Bare knuckled boxing match, no set number of rounds, to the KO.
Also, state an opinion on an outcome using two versions of Tyson:
1: Younger Tyson, when Cus was still around.
2: Older, ear biting Tyson.
NOW....Before the masses vote Tyson in a curbstomp, please remember Mickey's screen feats.
Tyson wins, going my the various feats in the movies he was in. If you want to amend the thread to gimp Tyson so Mickey wins, go ahead, but it's a clear gimp for no other reason than to push the outcome you want.
Originally posted by RobtardNice twist, I see what you tried to do there. Same thing you did when I pwned the Hogwarts/501st thread, you bring in the gimp accusations.
Here's your opening post; there's no link, son. Only says "Mike Tyson".Tyson wins, going my the various feats in the movies he was in. If you want to amend the thread to gimp Tyson so Mickey wins, go ahead, but it's a clear gimp for no other reason than to push the outcome you want.
OP states a particular Tyson movie, deal with it.
Go by the MVF rules, Rob, come on, you can do it.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Nice twist, I see what you tried to do there. Same thing you did when I pwned the Hogwarts/501st thread, you bring in the gimp accusations.OP states a particular Tyson movie, deal with it.
Go by the MVF rules, Rob, come on, you can do it.
REPEAT: Your opening post just says "Mike Tyson", no where did you say 'this counts, but this doesn't'. I posted the OP above, go look.
There's no twisting on my part, you're trying to amend the thread now, after the initial post so the outcome is to your liking.
You never "pwned" in the Hogwarts/501st thread, you just kept gimping the 501st until they literally couldn't win under the conditions.
Originally posted by RobtardI coulda swore I did, but it's OK, here, fifth post on the opening page:
REPEAT: Your opening post just says "Mike Tyson", no where did you say 'this counts, but this doesn't'. I posted the OP above, go look.There's no twisting on my part, you're trying to amend the thread now, after the initial post so the outcome is to your liking.
You never "pwned" in the Hogwarts/501st thread, you just kept gimping the 501st until they literally couldn't win under the conditions.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
You guys see the movie Tyson? From what I remember, the actor didn't portray the real Tyson's speed. He was like the diet coke of Tyson, Tyson watered down.Also, Mickey KO's in one punch, just like Tyson. FFS he broke a guys neck with ONE punch. Has Tyson ever broken a guys neck with one punch?
He has a good jab, which Buster Douglas used to **** Tyson up. Not to mention that the Pikey can take a shitload of abuse. It's not as cut and dry as you guys think it is.
Also, this is the MVF, we use movie characters, anyone assuming I meant real life Tyson is an idiot. Also, the documentary is out the window, I never stated documentary Tyson, not sure if documentaries are even allowed here.
Yes, Rob, I buried every argument for the 501st. All I did was ask the thread starter to be more specific on the fight conditions. He did, then I pwned. By doing so, you and others were butthurt and say I gimped.
Michael Jai White was not in said documentary, he was in the FEATURE film Tyson. You know, the one I stated the thread was about. Stick to MVF rules, you can do it. I did it, it's easy.
No. I asked the thread starter "Are star destroyers included? Be more specific with the conditions." He did. I took the conditions he was more clear on and I pwned. How is that gimping? It was quite obvious that the 501st would pwn if they had star destroyers, man.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Michael Jai White was not in said documentary, he was in the FEATURE film Tyson. You know, the one I stated the thread was about. Stick to MVF rules, you can do it. I did it, it's easy.No. I asked the thread starter "Are star destroyers included? Be more specific with the conditions." He did. I took the conditions he was more clear on and I pwned. How is that gimping? It was quite obvious that the 501st would pwn if they had star destroyers, man.
Like I said, not in the opening post. You amended after the fact.
No, that's now how it went down at all. Star Destroyers weren't the issue.
Anyhow, I'm done here, if it's just MJW's feats, he loses. Tyson on the otherhand would stomp. I have silly SW faboys to slap-around in the Pinhead-Vader thread. They know no bounds in their nonsense.
Originally posted by RobtardMVF rules dictate we must cement the conditions in the first few opening posts. I did so.
Like I said, not in the opening post. You amended after the fact.No, that's now how it went down at all. Star Destroyers weren't the issue.
Anyhow, I'm done here, if it's just MJW's feats, he loses. Tyson on the otherhand would stomp. I have silly SW faboys to slap-around in the Pinhead-Vader thread. They know no bounds in their nonsense.
Yes, star destroyers were in the mix, there was also the question of where the clones were attacking from. All I did was ask dude to be more specific.
Agreed and agreed.
And I just agreed with you in the Pinhead thread.
Originally posted by Rogue JediYes, Rob, I buried every argument for the 501st.
ROFL, PMSL, ROFPSML and LMAO...!!!!!!
Pure comedy gold.
You buried your own arguments like a cat buries his turd in a child's sandpit, after beating them with leather, buckles and studs.
Tyson KOs, rapes and bites the ear off of Mickey and eats his children FTW
PS before saying anything that hilarious again, please give warning, as I nearly spat tea all over my monitor and keyboard when I read that.
Thanks again for the laughs...I havent been creased up like that since hearing Jim Jefferies' Amsterdam story.
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
PS before saying anything that hilarious again, please give warning, as I nearly spat tea all over my monitor and keyboard when I read that.
If you get a chance, watch his "I Swear To God" standup performance. It can be DL'd online.
Hmm....Watching Half Blood Prince as we speak. Death Eaters flying around, destroying bridges. Interesting. Death Eaters flying towards Hogwarts, trying to get in, bouncing off the shield charm.......VERY interesting.....Screen feats now dictate that no one, not even a highly trained Clone trooper, and nothing, not even a plasma blast, get's past a shield charm.
Hmm....Interesting.