John McClane versus Rambo...

Started by Robtard5 pages
Originally posted by dadudemon

Right, cause, all of a sudden, being in a building completely nulls all of Rambo's skills. He's completely useless, now. Can't do a thing. He just sits there on the floor, crying cause he's about to get pwned. 😬

No, that would be a stupid thing to think, as Rambo's a trained killer(and possible sodomite, must investigate further). But in the end, he'd just be another McVictim.

Seems to me Mac has military training. He knew what to do with the C4, didn't he put detonators in it?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Seems to me Mac has military training. He knew what to do with the C4, didn't he put detonators in it?

He did. But you don't need military training to figure that out. Regardless, he's awesome.

Originally posted by Robtard
He did. But you don't need military training to figure that out. Regardless, he's awesome.
I can't imagine an average cop knowing what to do with C4.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I can't imagine an average cop knowing what to do with C4.

He's a veteran detective and he's obviously not average by any means.

This is what I am saying, McClane is not average indeed.

Rambo takes out a chopper with explosive arrows, McClane uses a Ford Crown Victoria.

Hmmm........Better call Maaco.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Seems to me Mac has military training. He knew what to do with the C4, didn't he put detonators in it?

I know what to do with C4, so I guess that makes me a level 9 detective, right? awesome

Originally posted by Robtard
Rambo takes out a chopper with explosive arrows, McClane uses a Ford Crown Victoria.

Chopper was at the end of the tunnel. Rambo was doing it right out and in the open.

It's hard to say which one impressed me more...but I think the bow and arrow one was more impressive...that's just...absurd n'shit.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I know what to do with C4, so I guess that makes me a level 9 detective, right? awesome

Chopper was at the end of the tunnel. Rambo was doing it right out and in the open.

It's hard to say which one impressed me more...but I think the bow and arrow one was more impressive...that's just...absurd n'shit.

Sure you do, sure you do.

Both ways were effective, Mac's looked cooler.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi

Both ways were effective, Mac's looked cooler.

Not only cooler, showed extreme resourcefulness and quick thinking.

Originally posted by Robtard
Not only cooler, showed extreme resourcefulness and quick thinking.

He was outta bullets awesome

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Sure you do, sure you do.

Both ways were effective, Mac's looked cooler.

What's so hard to understand about a compound that detonates with a detonator cap...when said cap can be triggered by electricity arching?

Not only that, I would easily recognize a binary explosive...unmixed of course. The smell should give it away, if it is an ammonium nitrate based explosive.

I'm certainly no explosives expert, and no where near a veteran detective.

But, based on your comments about McClane, I would some sort of super detective...which is not true. Now, my comparison is anecdotal, but, you'd be hard pressed to find a dude in Oklahoma or Texas that didn't know what I know about plastique and binary explosives.

In fact, I don't think there's one person in this thread that didn't already know what I just posted in the first 2 "paragraphs."

Originally posted by dadudemon
What's so hard to understand about a compound that detonates with a detonator cap...when said cap can be triggered by electricity arching?

Not only that, I would easily recognize a binary explosive...unmixed of course. The smell should give it away, if it is an ammonium nitrate based explosive.

I'm certainly no explosives expert, and no where near a veteran detective.

But, based on your comments about McClane, I would some sort of super detective...which is not true. Now, my comparison is anecdotal, but, you'd be hard pressed to find a dude in Oklahoma or Texas that didn't know what I know about plastique and binary explosives.

In fact, I don't think there's one person in this thread that didn't already know what I just posted in the first 2 "paragraphs."

I know magical spells.

Well McClane definitely would know.

I watched Rambo 1 and 2 the other day.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Rambo. Cause he is more skilled, has better damage soak, and killed more people in all of his films.

Also, Rambo is a better shot, and a faster shot.

Also, Rambo was and is in better shape than John McClane ever was or is.

Rambo also is a better H2H fighter.

Rambo doesn't need luck. He makes his own luck by ripping Luck's head off, biting out it's Larynx and using the larynx as chewing tobacco, and shooting people through Luck's bowels, just to silence his shots.

I changed my mind.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I watched Rambo 1 and 2 the other day.

I changed my mind.

Watch DH 1-4.

Change your mind again, you whimsical little girl.

Hey Rob.

Re: John McClane versus Rambo...

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
First of all, NOT a spite thread.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi

I changed my mind.

Surprise surprise. 🙄

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I watched Rambo 1 and 2 the other day.

I changed my mind.

Awesome. 😄

Rambo is gewd.

I thought it was a bit absurd that somehow...this lucky cop was going to defeat a one-man-army.