Infinity Gauntlet Vs. Cosmic Armor

Started by xJLxKing91 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
What did it actually adapt to though?

Mandrakk 😉

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Mandrakk 😉
What abilities of Mandrakk?

Originally posted by quanchi112
What abilities of Mandrakk?

There was a panel where it states that as Mandrakk get stronger because he is feeding on the universes, Superman gets stronger to beat him thanks to...adapting 😉

Originally posted by xJLxKing
There was a panel where it states that as Mandrakk get stronger because he is feeding on the universes, Superman gets stronger to beat him thanks to...adapting 😉
So he got stronger. That's all that was stated. The power gem can will it's user to become stronger and physically unkoable. How do you know he can resist being frozen in time?

Originally posted by quanchi112
So he got stronger. That's all that was stated. The power gem can will it's user to become stronger and physically unkoable. How do you know he can resist being frozen in time?

The fact that it was stated.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
The fact that it was stated.
So when they call Odin omnipotent that's a fact as well?

Originally posted by quanchi112
So when they call Odin omnipotent that's a fact as well?

With proof, yes

Mandrakk was feeding on existence itself, and the presence was powerless to stop him.

that's not exactly weak...

Originally posted by -Pr-
Mandrakk was feeding on existence itself, and the presence was powerless to stop him.

that's not exactly weak...


✅ and the source, and Mxy or any other character you can think of

When did it state that God was powerless to stop it?

Originally posted by xJLxKing
With proof, yes
So you have no proof it can resist any of these tactic that I have been describing.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Mandrakk was feeding on existence itself, and the presence was powerless to stop him.

that's not exactly weak...

Not saying it is. I don't recall the presence being referenced though.

Originally posted by quanchi112
We don't get that whatsoever. Maelstrom left the scene and was later killed and then powered up moreso by Oblivion.

Then even at the height of his power he was still an equal to an avatar of Infinity in terms of pure power.

Thanos was above Eternity while at the height of Maelstrom's power he wasn't.

The writer makes a direct comparison while you are using a feat years later to justify something that is your interpretation only.

Doesn't change the fact that the IG had no effect on Maelstrom whatsoever.

Doesn't change the above fact whatsoever.

Neither does this.

No, just impressing on your mind that the UN has demonstrated far greater power than the IG has. Similar to your justification as to why you still consider the IG more powerful than Maelstrom. That's called a double-standard.

CA Everytime

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Doesn't change the fact that the IG had no effect on Maelstrom whatsoever.

Doesn't change the above fact whatsoever.

Neither does this.

No, just impressing on your mind that the UN has demonstrated far greater power than the IG has. Similar to your justification as to why you still consider the IG more powerful than Maelstrom. That's called a double-standard.

It blasted him. That was hardly what the ig was capable of and you know it. When Warlock blasted the abstracts and brought Eternity to his knees even he explained that would have had no effect on him if we was ready for battle and at his best. He isn't immune to the ig either.

The ig was greater than Oblivion which made Maelstrom's power greater than when he ran into the ig.

Ig lorded over the abstracts while at Maelstrom's height he was an equal to Infinity.

We have a writer comparing the ig to the un and we have a showing which never definitively states it actually remade the multiverse to my knowledge.

Originally posted by manx422
CA Everytime
How so?

Quanchi by the way, there is a large flaw in your argument, and I think ODG said it.
You claim that IG>UN in terms of "statement" which aren't correct but I wont get into that
However, UN>IG in terms of feats

Now if I say
CA>IG in terms of statement you wont take it because I don't have feats LFMAO 😂

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Quanchi by the way, there is a large flaw in your argument, and I think ODG said it.
You claim that IG>UN in terms of "statement" which aren't correct but I wont get into that
However, UN>IG in terms of feats

Now if I say
CA>IG in terms of statement you wont take it because I don't have feats LFMAO 😂

Ig defeated the un on panel. It was an incomplete ig as well as the reality gem was a fake. I bet you didn't know that.

So as it stands an ig set without the reality gem can completely shut down the un.

If the un can't even defeat an incomplete ig what chance does it have when you give it the real reality gem. None.

A later feat doesn't change how these two items matched up years later.

You don't read marvel so you wouldn't know.

the *real* reality gem wuz missin? *ouch* thats like THE most powerfull gem

imagine wut it could of done if it had that gem

I always thought the other gems seemed superfluous after a fashion when compared to the reality gem.

Originally posted by SoulDevourer
the *real* reality gem wuz missin? *ouch* thats like THE most powerfull gem

imagine wut it could of done if it had that gem

I know.

**** double post, delete plz