Originally posted by Omega VisionIt never demonstrated as much. Sypes got stronger and traded blows. Wow. Scary adaptive powers.
Its stated to be able to adapt to anything including the utlimate threat. It could adapt to anything the IG could throw at it.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0If it's obvious then why can't you prove it. A simple writer's interview of the word multiverse would help.
It isn't "spoon-fed." It's obvious. Try not to flip-flop your own positions to suit your arguments because you corner yourself into an inanity. Suggesting that the UN destroyed and recreated the Marvel Multiverse is my opinion only is pure comedy. This is absolutely false. And you contradict this falsity later on in the very same post.No, you don't get it. None of this has anything to do with whether a UN user can beat an IG user. I've said this no less than a dozen times. So have other people. Your endless attempts to straw-man me doesn't work. It's never worked. And it's painfully obvious because you've failed at it time and time again. None of this has anything to do with whether a UN user can beat an IG user for the umpteenth time. Repainting my argument into something more convenient to tackle because you can't confront my true argument is a straw-man and a logical fallacy.LT was never threatened by the IG. Ever. Snap of the fingers. On-panel. Representative of forces that dwarfed the IG's might. On-panel. Ignoring that doesn't remedy the huge gaping holes in your argument. It just highlights another unfailing weakness in your posts.Yes, the UN demonstrated greater power. It doesn't matter if the IG never attempted it. It never matched it. Don't try to use a negative proof fallacy on me. Just because I can't prove that the IG can never destroy, then recreate the multiverse in a blink because no IG user ever tried it does not upset the obvious factual comparison between what the UN and IG have actually done. Superman never tried to snap his fingers and kill half the universe. Nobody suggests that somehow throws Superman vs the IG into question. Another logical fallacy.
And here you literally contradicted your very own false statement from the beginning of your post. Don't even pretend like you've got a leg to stand on. "Real proof?" I have no idea what could possibly constitute "real proof" to someone who [b](i)
lies (and later contradicts that falsity in the very same post), (ii) repeatedly attempts to straw-man, (iii) conveniently ignores on-panel proof, (iv) uses negative proof fallacies, and (v) flip-flops his own positions in the very same thread when cornered. What could possibly constitute "real proof" to you? A handbook entry? A writer's interview? Holding your hand through multiple scanned panels? You can't even accept such explanatory posts by someone you formerly agreed with on this very issue. Your "simple" request presumes that you will respect logic over ignorance and a proffering of proof over the absence of proof. Your behavior in this thread literally makes this an acutely impossible request. [/B]
The ig never attempted said feat so you really don't have anything. The fact of the matter is the ig easily blinked out half the universe's population with a mere thought. So you don't see it being able to reset the universe?
Snap of his finger also undid his display of power which isn't anywhere near what an all out ig user was capable of. Eternity even commented that it wouldn't have brought him to his knees in a true battle.
The lt hesitated and it's common sense that to destroy an entire reality in the process of defeating someone is a threat to you.
Superman also doesn't have the complete mastery over the aspects the ig does. Your logic is almost pitiful. Comparing the ig and what it's been seen capable of to Superman let alone blanking out half the universe with a mere thought. Wow.
A simple statement on panel stating the multiverse or a writer stating as such. You need to calm down and either back up your case or realize not everyone takes your interpretations as facts.