KuRuPT Thanosi
Senior Member
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Seeing as the UN can and has destroyed and remade the entire multiverse (including the IG and many alternate IGs) I'd put it above the IG in terms of scale and power. The IG is much more precise and at least from a user standpoint more versatile. The IG's main advantage it seems is that any idiot can use it to become omnipotent whereas the UN requires a competent user like Reed Richards or Galactus to reach its full potential. It was clear that Quasar wasn't a competent user and the circumstances were against him. The way I see it the IG is like a accurate, fool-proof pistol while the UN is an unwieldy cannon that takes some skill to use and some time to fire but when it fires it is capable of things the IG cannot do: like Multiversal reordering.
I have ZERO issue with the UN having a greater scale of power than the IG. No problem there. I have zero issue with the UN having the greater ONE feat than the iG. No issue there. My issues are these...
1. It's PURE speculation that ANY other user would've made a lick of difference. That was neither stated in the comic or in subsequent interviews after. If Reed was using it you could go ooo well it was Reed who was using it. Fact are.. we have a battle the IG won and VERY VERY easily at that. What another UN user could've done is pure speculation. However, what is logically is they wouldn't have been able to do a damn thing different. Too much versatility in the IG
2. I've argued that the IG is at the very least multi universal if not multiversal. The Multi-universal is indisputable and I think there is enough evidence for Multiversal as well. However, that argument has been done and done.
3. I've also argued that ONE feat does not make one superior.. I've used example which prove my point...
a. Doom is IMO pretty equal to Reed in a variety of aspects including intelligence and Prep. I view them as peers. As a matter a fact many would argue Doom is better than Reed. Yet, Reed as ONE feat that is clearly far and away much better than anything Doom has ever done. Of course I'm referring to the multiversal mapping feat with the I.B. Now based on the logic that has come up in this thread.. That would make Reed indisputably superior. I don't agree with that train of thought. Another example is Wolverine and Sabertooth. In their many storied encounters sabertooth has won some and lost some but I believe won more than lost. Yet Wolverine clearly has the greater feats.. so by this train of thought he's superior. Yet, he's lost many one v one encounters. We can even use Superman or SS and go well they have incredible lifting/versatility feats that Thanos can't match. Thus, by this train of thought they are superior because they have the greater feats.. Yet, common sense and one v one encounters tells us Thanos is far far superior than SS and IMO Supes. So, this fallacy that one feat makes you superior I believe I shown to not really always if at all being true.
b. One can be much more versatile than the other which in turn makes one or something superior. For example, Supes is faster, stronger and a better h2h fighter than Surfer. So, he's superior is SOME areas, yet Surfer's versatility and superiority in such makes him the unquestioned favorite in a one v one encounter. The UN may be superior in scale and the remaking of the Multiverse.. cool. However, the IG makes you GOD of that universe with so so many more options.. You are a master of Time, Space, Reality, Soul, Mind etc etc. So so many more options that could make it superior and certainly gives it the advantage in a one v one situation. As I pointed out if I am being two objects a pistol or a rocket launcher… The guy says well the RL obviously does a lot of damage and is much more powerful than the pistol in terms of damage scale. However, the Pistol can control the RL or RL user and make it fire on oneself. Hmmmm the choice seems very easy to me.
Those are the points and the only points I'm arguing.