Infinity Gauntlet Vs. Cosmic Armor

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Omega you still you still haven't yet to address the point I made. You said beating infinity was no big deal cause he jobs to everybody. True he has some low showings no doubt. However, this was different in that Thanos completely replaced Eternity and its role. Despite Eternity Jobbing nobody just replaces Eternity and all that Eternity stands for ever. That is what made that so significant is that he did so in one move with the greatest of ease. It would be similiar to somebody replacing the Source in DC.. which to me is more impressive than somebody beating the source in a PIS filled story.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Tehn you aren't answering the question honestly. To debate the strengths of characters we do it on equal terms.

Holding back vs. holding back or all out vs. all out.

A stalker? 😂 If by stalk you mean respond to someone's comments on a public forum then aren't we all stalkers? you lied and I caught you. I didn't find it in your pm box I find it on the superman thread.

In marvel there are. In comic book universes real world physics take a back seat. and you act as if you are grown up and try talking real world stuff with comics in the same sentence.

Lt's more powerful than both the ig or eternity so him beating either proves what? The word all powerful had to do with this reality and only someone on Lt's power level that we saw on panel was more powerful.

Again, you fail to understand the simple concept writers can complete freedom to do whatever it is they want in a story so you attaching real world definitions/applications is hilarious.

Exactly. Omega doesn't read enough marvel comics though to understand this. Sad.

Eternity is greater than the Source.

Both you and Mr. Master have used the terms God and Omnipotent when neither of those things are true, even by comics standards. If the IG made Thanos truly omnipotent (IE Supreme Being, which is what beating the Cosmic Armor would likely take) then LT wouldn't have dwarfed its power and the HOTU wouldn't have been any different. Hence why Grant Morrison used a much less exact term: eternal power.
To sum up my argument: the IG gave Thanos power equal or greater to Eternity: the power of one universe while Mandrakk was drawing on the power of 52 universes. Superman in the CA beat Mandrakk. The IG has never and will most likely never even hang with a being with the power of 52 universes let alone defeat such a being.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
I did address it, perhaps you skipped over. Defeating Eternity and replacing Eternity is a universal feat, the LT didn't even care to interfere because it wasn't that big of a deal. It was only when Warlock got the Gauntlet and started really causing trouble that he stepped in.

You're making arguments from ignorance. Comics allows for imagination yes, but unless the point is to highlight and comment on such contradictions and inconsistencies as was the case in Morrison's Final Crisis then the writer should do his damnedest not to be lazy and call every ****ing cosmic being omnipotent or infinite.

Both you and Mr. Master have used the terms God and Omnipotent when neither of those things are true, even by comics standards. If the IG made Thanos truly omnipotent (IE Supreme Being, which is what beating the Cosmic Armor would likely take) then LT wouldn't have dwarfed its power and the HOTU wouldn't have been any different. Hence why Grant Morrison used a much less exact term: eternal power.
To sum up my argument: the IG gave Thanos power equal or greater to Eternity: the power of one universe while Mandrakk was drawing on the power of 52 universes. Superman in the CA beat Mandrakk. The IG has never and will most likely never even hang with a being with the power of 52 universes let alone defeat such a being.

Whether or not someone is attacking 52 universes, etc. this doesn't mean in combat your said being defeats an ig user.

Didn't Superman knock him off a cliff? LOL at a cliff even being involved in a scenario with the ig as it can be manipulated along with the ca or Mandrakk at the will of the ig user.

Ig's power with what we saw on panel is greater than the ca or Mandrakk.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Except when the writer means it. Just like the term infinite it can take on a somewhat different meaning in comics.

Whether or not someone is attacking 52 universes, etc. this doesn't mean in combat your said being defeats an ig user.

Didn't Superman knock him off a cliff? LOL at a cliff even being involved in a scenario with the ig as it can be manipulated along with the ca or Mandrakk at the will of the ig user.

Ig's power with what we saw on panel is greater than the ca or Mandrakk.

Remember that the multiverse was something that the PM noticed at some point.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
It was a cliff that was outside of the multiverse and it overlooked the truly infinite chasm that was the Primal Monitor/Overvoid. To them the multiverse was like an antfarm. The IG would be nano-technology to Mandrakk and the CA. To think the IG could manipulate something outside of its reality is laughable.

Remember that the multiverse was something that the PM noticed at some point.

Whether or not the ig's powers work here is moot as

In this forum battle the ig's powers work and with them it's a one sided stomp.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Size is irrelevant to the ig. Distance and what not holds no meaning for the ig so a cliff means nothing in the end.

Whether or not the ig's powers work here is moot as

In this forum battle the ig's powers work and with them it's a one sided stomp.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Then why bring it up? You seem to dislike Morrison's writing because you can't imagine that maybe the cliff wasn't a literal cliff at all and you can't handle the idea. You're unable to interpret beyond simple pictures and words, you must have been a real shitty English student.

LOL.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Because it was a cliff......just not your ordinary cliff. I do interpret things quite well and just today you admitted you were wrong to me about a dov related issue.

LOL.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
And by your twisted logic that invalidates everything I have said and will ever say? If anything it proves I'm a bigger person because you've never admitted to being wrong even though on average you're wrong ten times a day.

Give me one example where I have been wrong.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it proves you have taken a personal issue against me because you try to insult me yet you have admitted you were wrong to me. If I have a different opinion debate with me don't insult just because I don't see things from omega's perspective.

Give me one example where I have been wrong.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Just because I dislike a character I still have read many comics with him in it so going into another forum when board isn't stalking. I just so happened to find a quote to prove you lied to me.

You told me something you completely disagreed with on another section on here. you said Orion is stronger than said Superman is 3 times stronger at his best. 😂

Everyone changes their opinion from time to time but you just lied to me to pretend you aren't biased for Superman when you are.

You happened to find a quote and read as always just the part you wanted to. I wrote Superman 100, Orion 110. SO no lying, just you giving your best to impress me 😉.

I'm not nearly as biased to Superman as you are for Thanos. 😉 I admit when he is overpowered and don't ignore the feats of his opponents. And yeah, Orion is stronger, as durable and a better fighter, he should win against Superman, you will find my opinion on the vs Forum more often, even before this thread. That I believe that Supes is capable to be as powerful as SBP doesn't change this. You can try as hard as you want, but your attempts are just pathetic 😉.

Here btw a Quote from me before I "lied" to you.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
The Dog of War would win 6-7/10 against Superman.
This Supermanwannabe won't win more then 1 out of 10. Glads is a Jobber for Gods like Thor 😉.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpTXHhMa_YQ

^ do you really have that much hatred for thanos. I just noticed your sig and your avatar.

Originally posted by Power Cosmic II
^ do you really have that much hatred for thanos. I just noticed your sig and your avatar.

Originally posted by Power Cosmic II
^ do you really have that much hatred for thanos. I just noticed your sig and your avatar.

No, I find it funny to annoy Thanos fans who overrate him too much, there are some on those boards. 😮
It seems I'm quite successful 😉.

Thanos is quite cool, not one of my fav (by far not) but he is one of the better cosmic villains in the Marvel U.

i like Thanos. Not my favorite, as my sig attests, but i do like him. However, I do find your sig and avatar quite funny. Half of it because i just find it unbelievable that superman is the one. but whatever, i vaguely remember quanchi having a thanos sig with darkseid's head hanging like a medal of honor. that was pretty funny.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
When you said that Darkseid never used the Omega Effect/Force from his hands and when someone showed a scan you dodged it and pretended like you never had that view. That's one of many examples. The problem is you seem incapable of seeing your own faults even beyond what would normally be expected from a narcissist, a liar, and a troll.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
You happened to find a quote and read as always just the part you wanted to. I wrote Superman 100, Orion 110. SO no lying, just you giving your best to impress me 😉.

I'm not nearly as biased to Superman as you are for Thanos. 😉 I admit when he is overpowered and don't ignore the feats of his opponents. And yeah, Orion is stronger, as durable and a better fighter, he should win against Superman, you will find my opinion on the vs Forum more often, even before this thread. That I believe that Supes is capable to be as powerful as SBP doesn't change this. You can try as hard as you want, but your attempts are just pathetic 😉.

Here btw a Quote from me before I "lied" to you.

Originally posted by Power Cosmic II
i like Thanos. Not my favorite, as my sig attests, but i do like him. However, I do find your sig and avatar quite funny. Half of it because i just find it unbelievable that superman is the one. but whatever, i vaguely remember quanchi having a thanos sig with darkseid's head hanging like a medal of honor. that was pretty funny.

Originally posted by quanchi112

I also have a few old sigs I should put up. Batman Prime seems to have a problem with Thanos, but if I were him I would to as Thanos is a lot more powerful than his favorite character.

it's just the way certain characters are written. let people like who they like, let them dislike who they dislike. if the sig is funny, then all the better.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Terminology varies from writer to writer. The whole thing I was arguing was he can't erase you from blasts via his hands. The scan backed up my case. When I am wrong I admit it it's just you are rarely ever right.

Originally posted by Power Cosmic II
it's just the way certain characters are written. let people like who they like, let them dislike who they dislike. if the sig is funny, then all the better.

I have still I just found it a sig created by someone arguing against batman prime in an older thread. It isn't the superman sig I have up now either.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
You have poor memory it seems. Before that you claimed that he never called the handblasts the Omega Force/Effect and that they were completely different.
Point me to a case of me being wrong where I didn't later admit to a misconception and then point me to a case where you were wrong and owned up to it.

Superman wins!

Originally posted by WickedDynamite
Superman wins!