Originally posted by Burning thought
...you could not disregard Kain tossing planets and wiping out galaxies with his breath because "the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" right? 🙄
That's exactly what I'm saying.
The point is, you need proof for every claim; the "cans" and the "cannots". You cant just skip out on something because it doesn't make sense to you or it sounds like a fairytale.
Originally posted by LLLLLink
That's exactly what I'm saying.The point is, you need proof for every claim; the "cans" and the "cannots". You cant just skip out on something because it doesn't make sense to you or it sounds like a fairytale.
Ridiculous then. In your view everyone can spit out ridiculous feats for any character and because most of the time it cannot be disproved they would be able to keep that argument open indefinaltey. This argument I am using has the "cans" and "cannots" however so your point is moot. Link and the LoZ series as a whole seem to defy physics because of several points. The fiction itself never brings up physics and has cute little rainbows and toon feats...its obvious not to take it seriously as GoW, LoK or DMC.
Originally posted by Burning thought
Explain? you did just say that unless you can "disprove" me that I can even without evidence claim Kain can bust galaxies with his breath?
Hey now, that just means I can't disprove you, not that its true.
What I can say is that Kain would never use this claimed ability in combat since he never used it in his game, going by that same logic.
Kind of senseless, ain't it? This is why we need a standard of operations to go by, (aka KMC rules).
Originally posted by LLLLLink
Hey now, that just means I can't disprove you, not that its true.
What I can say is that Kain would never use this claimed ability in combat since he never used it in his game, going by that same logic.Kind of senseless, ain't it? This is why we need a standard of operations to go by, (aka KMC rules).
Thats what I meant, therefore my argument until you can disprove me is apprently open? which is what your saying about this argument over the plausability of this feat?
KMC rules do not cover how arguments should work.