Originally posted by quanchi112
Drax was designed to best him but the writer chose to do so in a fashion in which his back was turned and he wasn't fighting back so there was never anything pointing to Thanos being unable to stop him. Drax was simply in the right place in the right time under the right circumstances. Like I said had the writer chose to have Thanos trying his best to best him and been unable to you'd have a point but since he wasn't you have nothing. Context, it's everything. People like yourself don't care about the context because you're biased not like me.I never said Thanos would win in this tale my point was he was a huge game changed in this story which you cannot ever take away. I mean you aren't even intelligent enough to keep up with my point and want to switch this into a vs. argument. You lost a ways back.
You can't change the fact T and A were sent by Thanos so you can't say what would have happened and be a hypocrite in your very own post as Thanos will always send them after that cosmic loser Galactus. I mean isn 't herc just slapping G around like nothing. The guy loses with so much power I question his intelligence because he always finds ways to lose. I will use your own points against you with your own logic but at the en dof the day my point still stands Thanos is a game changer like always.
This is incredibly comical, I'm unhappy that work has kept me away for so long as I missed out on this comedy. Yes you are using my own points against me...points which have dismantled your position and have nothing to do with my own
I never said Thanos would win in this tale my point was he was a huge game changed in this story which you cannot ever take away. I mean you aren't even intelligent enough to keep up with my point and want to switch this into a vs. argument. You lost a ways back.
LOL. How many times did I tell you not to drag this down to a vs. argument, yet you regurgitate what I've been instructing you to do when it has no relevance to my point. Yes, imitation is the best form of flattery but you need to learn some tact, which you lack as you've been blundering and stumbling in this discussion so far; I will have to redouble my efforts to rehabilitate your logic. It flops like a woman's tampon in the toilet at the moment. Intelligence, my son, is clearly lacking in someone's capacity but never let it be known that you lost so long ago that you have nothing to resort to but claiming someone lacks the intelligence to agree with your inane and incompetent conclusions. I mean your whole post had nothing of substance except for attacking me LOL. Keep telling yourself you've won. At this point we both know you're keeping this up just to save face and so you don't shatter the false security and confidence you have in yourself.
...T&A were "sent" by Thanos? Did you even read Annihilation? Thanos was shit out of luck when he discovered the Beyonder was dead except he JUST so happened to run into T&A in the same jail facility, who JUST so happened to have a vendetta against Galactus, and who were ALREADY seeking Galactus even before Thanos ran into them. That, my meek disciple, is the definition of "the right place at the right time with the right people." Drax had already the intent to kill Thanos and was rushing to him the entire issue. He breached Thanos shields and Schmidt, whose word carries more volume than yours ever will, stated that the whole scene was designed to show Drax as being able to adapt and take down Thanos with unrelenting, unstoppable fashion (hence the silver bullet). The fact that Drax ripped through his shields, shields which helped him survive Odin and required Galactus to 2nd guess how much energy he'd actually have to expend, where breached in seconds by Drax's bare hands and finger-nails, serves testament to Schmidt's remark that Drax was essentially the plot device to take Thanos down by issue's end. Context matters in a versus debate, but your street-level view still ignores the fact that Schmidt and Giffen never, ever, ever, stated that Thanos would die by being "at the wrong place at the wrong time." They stated that Drax was engineered to kill him and that Drax would not fail. That is the plot and story, which dominate the circumstances. This is like you trying to argue that if Superman had sun-dipped in preparation for Doomsday, then Doomsday would have been defeated. No! Doomsday will ALWAYS kill Superman because the entire story was building up to that point. Now go ahead and regurgitate that I'm trying to bring this down to a vs. forum level. Go ahead. You'll make as much sense at the brown logic which still litters this thread, all excreted by you.