Originally posted by -Pr-
how would you know?
Easily. I pretty much explained it to you in my last post to you. Also when im debating with you you can clearly see you haven't read as much as I have. Its like me sometimes trying to debate Superman with you.
Originally posted by -Pr-
and this really isn't the thread for this.
True actually.
Originally posted by Deadline
Easily. I pretty much explained it to you in my last post to you. Also when im debating with you you can clearly see you haven't read as much as I have. Its like me sometimes trying to debate Superman with you.True actually.
just because i haven't read as much as you doesn't mean i haven't read a substantial amount.
and yet, you've tried that.
Originally posted by -Pr-
just because i haven't read as much as you doesn't mean i haven't read a substantial amount.
..and as I explained to you that wasn't enough. As I pointed out to you most of your perception of what Punisher can do probably comes from the Mike Baron era which blatantly shows you have an incomplete idea of what hes capable of.
Originally posted by -Pr-
and yet, you've tried that.
Not sure what you mean, but I think I agreed in the end I had to read more which is why I get into a debate with you I try not to make sweeping generlisations.
Ok I shouldn't have started this but I don't like double standards. I don't like seeing you ***** about people calling Superman feats PIS and then doing the exact same thing to Punisher. facepalm
Originally posted by Deadline
..and as I explained to you that wasn't enough. As I pointed out to you most of your perception of what Punisher can do probably comes from the Mike Baron era which blatantly shows you have an incomplete idea of what hes capable of.Not sure what you mean, but I think I agreed in the end I had to read more which is why I get into a debate with you I try not to make sweeping generlisations.
Ok I shouldn't have started this but I don't like double standards. I don't like seeing you ***** about people calling Superman feats PIS and then doing the exact same thing to Punisher. facepalm
Supes doesnt have PIS in his comics, you should know that.
Originally posted by Placidityhttp://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=474929&highlight=myth+forumid%3A95
Sometimes for whatever reason, perhaps mostly repetition by fanboys, some characters overtime are accepted as being able to take on people they should lose to, or vice versa.What are the top 3 myths regarding characters power levels that you'd want to fix in the Comics Vs section?
Lately, I've seen Wonder Woman being championed as a very close contender against Superman (I believe in the past, not many people would've supported this view). That would be one example of what this thread is about (I'm not saying I agree with it or not).
Or maybe, you don't think Green Lantern is as close as a match/ or is way more powerful than the Silver Surfer etc.
Sometimes these things really frustrate me, and I'm sure people want to set a few things straight too. While I know that after this thread passes nothing is really gonna change, its still good to get your opinion out there.
What do you guys think?
Ok my first little rant:
One thing I really dislike is the notion is that Spider-man always loses to Martial Artists - even peak human ones. The guy takes regular blows from class 10-ton+ enemies. A peak human blow isn't going to affect him in a [b]PIS-less battle
, unless possibly if it was a nerve strike. Also MA was developed for humans, it really wouldn't take advantage of Spider-mans other abilities, so Spider-man's style is not "bad" at all, its just the most effective way of fighting for his powerset. [/B]
Edit: Just read the posts. Too many people starting on other posters. That's why threads like this will get closed in the Vs Forum.
And Deadline, starting up with a mod who wasn't even posting to you...not the smartest move. Every character has PIS. I've seen you go at Wolverine fans tooth and nail over the same ideals that you're backing regarding a certain character. sneer
biscuits