Thanos vs. Quasar

Started by KK the Great14 pages
Originally posted by quanchi112
Well, if you read the ig storyline you'd realize he was against all of the regular heroes. He didn't feat defeat by any stretch of the word until Surfer almost grabbed his glove. At that moment and that moment alone did he really get serious.

And once again, you're going to need more than "he was just funnin', brah" to form a compelling argument that he altered the composition of his physical body to make himself less durable.

The notion that Thanos made himself less durable or weaker than normal in Infinity Gauntlet is just asinine.

The only think he did was remove his omniscience.

Originally posted by KK the Great
And once again, you're going to need more than "he was just funnin', brah" to form a compelling argument that he altered the composition of his physical body to make himself less durable.
It's you who is clinging once again to his own beliefs while I am using the argument backed up by his state of mind with the gems.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's you who is clinging once again to his own beliefs while I am using the argument backed up by his state of mind with the gems.

That he altered his body to be less durable is backed up by ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

Originally posted by Naija boy
If SS cannot come close to putting thanos down with his poweroutput quasar is no way in hell doing it regardless of his supposed brutality or whatever ur talking about.........this thread is just full of fail

Since Power A doesn't equal power B then what you say is full of fail.

For example, Some beings have more power output than some magic users. Yet Superman can possibly be more damaged from the magic users output (even though it is less).

Another examples are:

Sue vs. Exitar
Drax vs. Thanos
Magic/TP vs. Juggernaut

Since Thanos has some control of the power cosmic himself (along with other things) then it stands to reason that it wouldn't affect him as much as something of a different source. Thanos can absorb and store cosmic energy through his being like nothing. This is why SS's blasts have almost no effect on him. Let SS amp up and strike him physically (especially with the board) and we will get a different story indeed.

Originally posted by KK the Great
That he altered his body to be less durable is backed up by ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
Quasar wasn't a serious threat and it makes perfect sense. Do you favor quasar against Thanos in a fight provided he uses the technique used in the comic?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Speaking of ignorance regarding Thanos it only seems fitting you show up to attach yourself to whatever argument takes a shot at him. You didn't read the story obviously so really you are just jumping on the hater bandwagon.

Relax, I actually don't have a problem with Thanos just the shitty stories writers have attached to him. And it's pretty damn obvious I didn't read the issue, I made it clear in my first post. Secondly, I rarely debate or talk about Thanos, you just happen to be in every Thanos thread.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Who cares whether you liked it or not. It's a lot more memorable and popular than fc so leave your opinion out of it and stick to the issue at hand.

I have freedom of speech, don't I? And what does FC have to do with the weak story in IG?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos was obviously fooling around and this is why it makes perfect sense. Any being with logic involved could shoot energy blasts at someone's eyes and defeat them that way but for one it will have to be a direct hit and for two fights in comics don't happen that way. It's about as ridiculous as saying someone puts a blackhole in your ear.

It's actually not that ridiculous, if someone's outershell is too tuff to breach, direct your attacks at his insides.

Originally posted by h1a8
Since Power A doesn't equal power B then what you say is full of fail.

For example, Some beings have more power output than some magic users. Yet Superman can possibly be more damaged from the magic users output (even though it is less).

Another examples are:

Sue vs. Exitar
Drax vs. Thanos
Magic/TP vs. Juggernaut

Since Thanos has some control of the power cosmic himself (along with other things) then it stands to reason that it wouldn't affect him as much as something of a different source. Thanos can absorb and store cosmic energy through his being like nothing. This is why SS's blasts have almost no effect on him. Let SS amp up and strike him physically (especially with the board) and we will get a different story indeed.

What in Gods name? The only reason SS blasts dont affect thanos is because he can control the power cosmic and hence the blasts SS uses against? U are a moron. I dare u to show me one time where SS was blasting thanos in which it was showed or mentioned that the reason he wasnt being affected was because he was absorbing and controlling SS attacks. Honestly i have no idea how u can have virtually no knowledge of the characters being discussed (or anything comic related for that matter), and then make nonsensical claims and attempt to pass them off as fact. Im sure ive told u this before (and im sure many others have as well) but once again............Something is clearly wrong with u.

Ur analogies are completely irrelevant here because thanos does not have some special resistance or counter to SS attacks as u have tried to claim. In this case the source of the power make no difference and all we are concerned with is the offensive output.
I realy shouldnt even be replying to ur foolishness anyways.....

Originally posted by Allankles
It's actually not that ridiculous, if someone's outershell is too tuff to breach, direct your attacks at his insides.

see thor vs mangog . . .

regardless--thanos wins this everytime.

Thanos 10/10.About the 2 arguments yes thanos did lower is durability and I think quasar did aim the blasts at either side of his head and not inside.

Originally posted by leonidas
see thor vs mangog . . .

regardless--thanos wins this everytime.

I've seen that one.

Yes Thanos wins 10/10, unless he toys with Quasar again.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Quasar wasn't a serious threat and it makes perfect sense.

It makes no sense at all, on top of being absolutely, utterly, entirely unsupported by the comic in any way whatsoever.

Originally posted by Allankles
Relax, I actually don't have a problem with Thanos just the shitty stories writers have attached to him. And it's pretty damn obvious I didn't read the issue, I made it clear in my first post. Secondly, I rarely debate or talk about Thanos, you just happen to be in every Thanos thread.

I have freedom of speech, don't I? And what does FC have to do with the weak story in IG?

It's actually not that ridiculous, if someone's outershell is too tuff to breach, direct your attacks at his insides.

We aren't discussing which Thanos stories we like or don't like so give it a rest. We are discussing the events in a Quasar issue and the events in ig and we already know you hate ig which is your loss.

Fc was a much weaker story no one even cared about in the first place.

Thanos won't be toying around with Quasar without the ig and humoring him.

Originally posted by KK the Great
It makes no sense at all, on top of being absolutely, utterly, entirely unsupported by the comic in any way whatsoever.
So Quasar was a serious threat to Thanos there? 😂 😂 Oh kk every once in a while I take you seriously and then I get a good laugh at your expense. Well done.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So Quasar was a serious threat to Thanos there?

What does that have to do with whether or not Thanos secretly lowered the durability of his body without the comic bothering to so much as imply that he was doing so?

For once I agree with quan.When compared to quasar thanos wins 8/10 minimum.

Originally posted by KK the Great
What does that have to do with whether or not Thanos secretly lowered the durability of his body without the comic bothering to so much as imply that he was doing so?
So you won't answer my question huh? Maybe because it would lead to Thanos having some fun with him which he was otherwise he could obliterate him with a thought.
Originally posted by Black bolt z
For once I agree with quan.When compared to quasar thanos wins 8/10 minimum.
Thanos doesn't lose a single matchup. Not one.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you won't answer my question huh?

Your question is as irrelevant as any point you've ever tried to make.

Thanos had the Infinity Gauntlet. OF COURSE he could have used the Infinity Gauntlet to beat Quasar instantly in any number of ways. OF COURSE Quasar posed no real threat to an Infinity Gauntlet wielder.

None of that has any bearing on the point you seem to have forgotten you were trying to make.

Originally posted by KK the Great
Your question is as irrelevant as any point you've ever tried to make.

Thanos had the Infinity Gauntlet. OF COURSE he could have used the Infinity Gauntlet to beat Quasar instantly in any number of ways. OF COURSE Quasar posed no real threat to an Infinity Gauntlet wielder.

None of that has any bearing on the point you seem to have forgotten you were trying to make.

Yes, it does. The fact Thanos was toying with pretty much every hero since he possessed the ig from his initial meeting with Drax and the Surfer. You have nothing.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, it does. The fact Thanos was toying with pretty much every hero since he possessed the ig from his initial meeting with Drax and the Surfer. You have nothing.

Why do you keep making the absurdly enormous leap from "he was toying with them" to "he was altering the composition of his body to make himself less naturally durable," and how could you possibly think that I would go for something so stupid?

Originally posted by KK the Great
Why do you keep making the absurdly enormous leap from "he was toying with them" to "he was altering the composition of his body to make himself less naturally durable," and how could you possibly think that I would go for something so stupid?
So you feel Quasar can destroy Thanos' head anytime he wants to? Seriously?